Review: The Hangover 2

The Hangover Part 2

Thanks for checking out our “The Hangover 2” review.

Genre: Comedy
Directed by: Todd Phillips
Starring: Bradley Cooper, Ed Helms, Zach Galifianakis
Released: May 26th, 2011


Two years after their escapade in Las Vegas, Stu (Ed Helms), Phil (Bradley Cooper), Doug (Justin Bartha), and Alan (Zach Galifianakis) are traveling to Thailand to celebrate Stu’s wedding to his fiancée, Lauren (Jamie Chung). Much to Alan’s dismay, they are joined by Lauren’s younger brother, Teddy (Mason Lee), a prodigy and pre-medical student at Stanford University. At the wedding reception, Lauren’s father shows his disapproval of Stu by comparing him to rice porridge on his toast. At the end of the night, Stu hesitantly joins Phil, Doug, Alan and Teddy for a beer. Sitting at a campfire and roasting marshmallows, the group toast to Stu and Lauren’s future happiness.
The following morning, Phil, Stu and Alan, along with gangster Leslie Chow (Ken Jeong – whom Alan befriended after Las Vegas) and a chain-smoking capuchin monkey, awaken in a dirty hotel room in Bangkok. Stu has a face tattoo, and Alan’s head is completely shaven. However, they cannot find Teddy, only discovering his severed finger.


The Wolfpack is Back and this movie is “bigger” in scope than the original. The premise of a “wild night in Vegas” is somewhat pre-established in North American pop culture, but a wild night in “Bangkok” differentiates it and establishes a bit of mystery.

This movie ditches the idea that every sequel needs to abandon what was appreciated about the preceding movie and instead gives us a sequel of “more”. The comedic exploits of Helms, Cooper, and Galifianakis are as fun as ever in this film. Galifianakis brings a lot more of his brand of humor to this movie. He is what he is, and love him or hate him he adds his brand of “funny” to this movie too, mostly, appreciable success.


They seemingly fast-tracked through the premise of Stu’s wedding in order to fast forward to the ‘wake up’ scene in which they try to piece together the details of the previous night’s escapades. While it is true that the “meat” of the movie is the events that occur after their night of partying, it doesn’t help establish the importance of Stu’s relationship with his bride-to-be and lessens the audience’s investment of the importance of getting to this wedding on time.

It’s difficult to find something unique about this movie. The action, humor, timing, and some of the jokes are all retreads of themes and ideas that were popular in the original. If you’ve seen the original then you’ll have a hard time finding unique “laugh out loud” moments to enjoy as the adventure closely follows the chain of events of the first movie with few differences that also lack the shock value of the original since they are retreading previously used jokes.

Ken Jeong. His character received just a bit too much exposure in this movie with his character being elevated to borderline “main” character status. He seemed to be very unrestrained in this movie as if the director just asked him to get “balls out” and he did. A lot. And it was very distracting.


I walked into this movie hoping to be polarized in the same way that the preceding movie surprised the hell out of me with its humor and shock value. This movie didn’t have that effect. Instead, I wound up watching this movie almost “expecting” things to happen at certain moments and they almost always did happen exactly when I expected. It’s not that the movie isn’t funny it’s just that the movie is very familiar and will really be appreciated by those who watch this without seeing the original.

I give The Hangover 2 a 6 out of 10

Comment with Facebook
The Hangover Part 2 Review
  • Acting - 0/10
  • Cinematography/Visual Effects - 0/10
  • Plot/Screenplay - 0/10
  • Setting/Theme - 0/10
  • Watchability - 0/10
  • Rewatchability - 0/10
User Review
0 (0 votes)

About Anthony Whyte

Content Manager | Senior Editor | Daydreamer | Keep your head on a swivel and don't blink

5 thoughts on “Review: The Hangover 2

  1. As a stand alone movie, Hangover 2 is pretty good. The problem is that there was a Hangover 1. I left my viewing of Hangover 2 feeling as if I had seen it all done before, and done better.

  2. Yeah, this movie was nothing compared to its predecessor. I tend to agree with Bitterness’ assessment – if this film was released on its own, with no relation to the original Hangover film (better yet, the original Hangover film never existed) then this might be better received. As it stands, this film is a shadow of its former glory.

  3. I agree with this review. For me, it wasn’t “fasttracking” through the importance of Stu’s wedding that took away the tension and urgency – we didn’t even get to know Justin Bartha’s wife in the beginning in the first film – but that Stu was still around, and the lack of relationship I felt with Teddy, caused me to be pretty blase about the whole scenario.

    A third Hangover film is on the way, and it sounds like the writers are hearing the complaints (despite the large box office) and thinking of heading in the direction of a funeral idea or something. Also, in Amsterdam. Just speculation, but it’d be interesting if the film took a turn towards the Hostel route and combined the silliness of the film’s premise with the serious tone of a horror film. So, pretty much a black comedy. I guess we just have to wait and see.

  4. I agree with this review to a point. If you compare this movie to the original, it is slightly worse. It lacks the freshness and original humour that the first one brought.

    However, the movie is still very funny. Ed Helmes, Zach Galifinakis and Bradley Cooper have great chemistry and comedic timing. This movie is still better than most comedies released. I think that the only way it suffers is through comparison to the first one.

    I would have like to see these three actors in a completely new movie, but with a similar character dynamic. Something similar to Chris Farley and David Spade in Tommy Boy and Black Sheep.

Leave a Reply