Little Fockers Trailer

The original Meet the Parents (2000) was really funny. The sequel, Meet the Fockers (2004), was so-so. This christmas, were getting a #3 with Little Fockers. De Niro and Stiller return for one more family reunion of sorts, but this time around it’s centered around Christmas.

Here’s the film’s synopsis and the trailer. Enjoy!

The test of wills between Jack Byrnes (Robert De Niro) and Greg Focker (Ben Stiller) escalates to new heights of comedy in the third installment of the blockbuster series—Little Fockers. Laura Dern, Jessica Alba and Harvey Keitel join the returning all-star cast for a new chapter of the worldwide hit franchise.

It has taken 10 years, two little Fockers with wife Pam (Polo) and countless hurdles for Greg to finally get “in” with his tightly wound father-in-law, Jack. After the cash-strapped dad takes a job moonlighting for a drug company, however, Jack’s suspicions about his favorite male nurse come roaring back.

When Greg and Pam’s entire clan—including Pam’s lovelorn ex, Kevin (Owen Wilson)—descends for the twins’ birthday party, Greg must prove to the skeptical Jack that he’s fully capable as the man of the house. But with all the misunderstandings, spying and covert missions, will Greg pass Jack’s final test and become the family’s next patriarch…or will the circle of trust be broken for good?

Meet the Parents = 166 million domestic/330 million worldwide
Meet the Fockers = 279 million domestic/516 million worldwide
Little Fockers = ???

How much money will Little Fockers do? The trailer doesn’t get me that excited. I mean, it looks like the same old jokes and gags recycled. I love Stiller and De Niro, but they kinda look tired; it’s like they are going through the motions simply for the paycheck. I’ll probably see it, but I know it won’t be that good. Hopefully a second trailer can change my mind later on…

What do you guys think?

Comment with Facebook

8 thoughts on “Little Fockers Trailer

  1. Geeze all these opinions are making me feel bad I laughed at the trailer. Damn I must be some soulless cynical person… oh wait no that’s most of you guys who are too cool for everyone else.

  2. Wow, I was turned off even by the name of the movie. Then I watched the trailer and realized I should have trusted my instincts and stay away. Unfortunately, the general population won’t have the same feeling and will (undoubtedly) laugh hysterically at this and beg for “Meet the Fockin’ Grandkids”

    1. So by the trailer you realize that the movie itself is as bad as you already jumped to the conclusion that it was?

      You haven’t seen the movie but already decided that something you havent seen is bad.

      Anticipation is one thing, but you cant say a movie is bad that you have not seen.

      1. Sure I can, did you watch the trailer? Would you say that the 2002 movie “Clockstoppers” had a chance after watching the trailer?

        All I’m saying was that I already had my mind made up at 0:01 of the trailer.

        You knew you were going to get 3 things:
        1) Robert De Niro pretending to be tough to his son-in-law “Im watch’n youz”
        2) Ben Stiller playing the same character he’s played for a decade.
        3) Recycled material which appears to be left over jokes from the first 2 movies.

        The trailer is supposed to entice!! I’m more enticed by Mentos gum!

      2. Again, you have the right to anticipate, but you cannot say that this IS a bad movie when you haven’t seen it. Maybe they are marketing things after what charmed people to go see the first two movies?

        Maybe your fragile sensitivities over what you consider an offensive title have you channeling this personal offense into focusing on the negative.

        People clearly liked the tough De Niro role, and Stiller’s Stiller role. It was that chemistry that made the first two very popular, and its that very same chemistry that they are working with here.

        McDonalds hasn’t changed the ingredients on the Big Mac for 50 years. And despite every negative thing people say about the product, people still buy it. All this franchise is doing is offering up more of something people clearly want to buy. I see no fault in that.

        Don’t want it? Don’t buy it.

  3. Wasn’t too impressed until the whole dick shot. Reminded me of the zipper scene in Something About Mary. That, and it gives a whole new meaning to the phrase “needle dick.”

  4. There was sneak peak of this in New Jersey, and someone blogged about it. Not gonna promote another movie website here, but you can google the review. I will be seeing this, although I don’t think it will hold a candle to the first one.

Leave a Reply