The Dark Knight Review
Thanks for checking out our “The Dark Knight” review. You can also check out our video version of The Dark Knight review at the bottom of this post.
**UPDATE - YOU CAN HEAR A FULL 35 MINUTE SPECIAL PODCAST WHERE DOUG NAGY AND I TALK ABOUT THE MOVIE. WARNING… THE PODCAST ASSUMES YOU’VE SEEN THE MOVIE ALREADY AND IS FILLED WITH SPOILERS. YOU CAN HEAR THE PODCAST HERE**
Batman Begins was easily the very best DC comic based film ever made. Yes, better than the Keaton Batman, yes better than the Reeve Superman. It was gritty, intense and fun all at the same time. The success of the film made it a virtual no brainer that there would be a follow up movie at some point… and the fact that Gordon shows Batman the Joker card made it even more obvious. But could another Batman flick live up to the expectations generated by the first? Would the film actually end up being as good as the fans WANT it to be? Would Heath Ledger’s performance as The Joker be as good as everyone is going to say it is regardless if he was great or horrible since there is an unwritten rule that everyone is SUPPOSED to say how great he is in it no matter what?
Well… off I went to see The Dark Knight this evening at the IMAX here in Los Angeles along with my buddy Robert from IESB, and I can tell you the film is not perfect… but it is one impressive movie nonetheless.
THE GENERAL IDEA
The synopsis for The Dark Knight looks like this: “In The Dark Knight, Batman raises the stakes in his war on crime. With the help of Lieutenant Jim Gordon and District Attorney Harvey Dent, Batman sets out to dismantle the remaining criminal organizations that plague the city streets. The partnership proves to be effective, but they soon find themselves prey to a reign of chaos unleashed by a rising criminal mastermind known to the terrified citizens of Gotham as The Joker.”
THE GOOD
One of the things I was preparing myself for was how over hyped the performance of Heath Ledger was going to be. Since he passed away, I knew he’d be getting rave reviews out the ying yang no matter what and I’d be frowned upon if I said any different. But holy mother suck puss face… HEATH LEDGER DESERVES AN OSCAR NOMINATION FOR HIS PERFORMANCE AS THE JOKER… no… I’m not even kidding in the least. I was totally, 100% blown away like nothing I’ve ever seen in a comic based movie before. He is at all times completely believable, at all time relentlessly disturbing, at all times nightmarishly frightening and at all times THE JOKER. This is a slightly different vision of The Joker than we’ve ever seen before… but it hits the mark so purely that even Batman himself is made to feel like a secondary character. It really was the performance of a lifetime for Ledger in all its poetic tragedy. I can not stress this enough… Ledger really was that good in this flick, and if he gets an Oscar nomination (which he really should), it won’t be out of sympathy or sentimentality… it will be because it was a performance worth of the honor. Absolute best performance in a comic book movie I’ve ever seen. Yes, he was THAT good.
The script was fantastic. The story moved forward at all times, the dialog was crisp, at times profound and always in character relative to the scenario. The way all the key characters are used in vital ways in the plot… all interconnecting in a very naturally feeling way… never forced… was something to see.
The action in The Dark Knight was vastly superior to Batman Begins in every way, shape and form. And we’re not just talking about fight scenes either. There are a couple of scenes that are more like heist movies than comic book ones and they totally work. The camera work is also much better for the fight and action in this movie than they were in the original which was quite a relief since that was one of my few complains about Begins.
Speaking of cinematography… it was INSANELY good. Visually speaking, the camera did as much work in The Dark Knight communicating elements to the audience as the dialog did. It was never over the top or gimmicky either. Each shot felt purposefully selected to aide in communication the underlaying emotion and experiences of the characters on screen… while at the same time giving us a sense of vastness to the scope of the shots. I could just sit and watch this movie on mute again and I’d probably still like it just as much.
Maggie Gyllenhaal (who took over for Katie Holmes) actually made Rachel Dawes a GOOD character instead of the eye gougingly annoying one that Holmes managed to make her out to be. The Dawes character is an important one… but the way Holmes portrayed her made us all wish she was never there in the first place… Gyllenhaal made her work, and work well.
What can I say? All the cast were solid. Christain Bale, Caine, Gary Oldman (who was especially good with a much bigger and more important role this time around), Eric Roberts… the list goes on and on. When an entire cast does such a good job, you have to look at the director. Christopher Nolan sir…. we salute you!
Holy crap did Two Face look WICKED!!!
THE BAD
My biggest complaint about The Dark Knight is one that no one will agree with at first… but if you think about it after a while I think you’ll change your mind… at over 2.5 hours the movie was too long. Sorry, it just was. At about the 2 hour mark I was ready to call The Dark Knight the best film of the year so far… and maybe one of the top 5 movies of the last 3 or 4 years. Yeah… THAT GOOD. Now, I have to be careful here to not give any spoilers away… so if some of this doesn’t make sense to you… it will after you see the flick. After about the 2 hour mark, a major component of the story gets finished… and it was the PERFECT time to stop the movie and be wide open to the next film. PERFECT. But instead Nolan felt the need to tell ANOTHER part to the story in this same movie… that was a big mistake in my opinion. All that energy, perfect pacing and focus that the movie had for the first 120 minutes got lost. Don’t get me wrong, it’s not that the last 30-40 minutes were bad… they just weren’t right for this movie. Something significant happens near the end (I can’t say what) that I believe was a total waste, and ultimately made the last 30 minutes a waste of time.
Scarecrow was WASTED… and I don’t mean he was on drugs. He’s on screen for about 30 seconds, then gone. Wheee… thanks for coming out. This may sound like a little bit of a spoiler, but it’s so irrelevant to the movie that it really doesn’t matter. Scarecrow isn’t even taken down like a true super villain. No no no… he gets taken down during a routine bust really. There was no need for Scarecrow to be used in that capacity… you could have had the same scene and had it be just another thug and it would have been exactly the same. Such a waste
OVERALL
This is a fantastic movie! Yes it’s too long, yes one or two of the characters are wasted… but aside from that it is a wonderfully told, MAGNIFICENTLY acted and beautifully shot comic book movie that ranks amongst one of the best films (not just comic book films) of the year so far. Not just a great comic movie… it is a great movie period. Overall, I give The Dark Knight an 8.5 out of 10.
CHECK OUT OUR VIDEO VERSION OF THE DARK KNIGHT REVIEW BELOW

306 Comments, Comment or Ping
Ginger
Hey John, good review…Just wondering, do you think it is totally necessary to see the movie in Imax? I want to, but I’m just hoping that the scenes filmed normally won’t llook distorted or out of place when viewed with the scenes filmed in Imax, and vice versa…any issues with it?
Jun 27th, 2008
Robert(wolf)
Fantastic review. I cannot wait, holy cow fuck, I need the phone booth now to travel in time to the future.
Jun 27th, 2008
John
Hey Ginger,
No, it’s not absolutely necessary to see it in IMAX. I saw no issues at all with it…. but hot damn did it ever look great on IMAX.
Jun 27th, 2008
A
Well damn… Can’t wait til the 25th when its out in Sweden.
Jun 27th, 2008
Steve L.
Excellent review. Holy timesink batman, that runtime is crazy for a comic book movie. Glad to hear that Heath Ledgers last performance will not disappoint. Now to wait 2 weeks…
Jun 27th, 2008
leaner
You already saw this you lucky bastard
Jun 27th, 2008
leaner
2 questions. You probably can’t answer this one.
#1. Is there another popular villian introduced in this movie? I heard there was. I don’t want to know who though.
#2. I hear The Heat being brought into discussion a lot, and that this movie inspired Nolan with some of his heist scenes. Do you get that feeling watching it?
Jun 27th, 2008
Eric
Hey John,
You said that TDK would have been one of the best movies in the past 3-4 years and you also said that it’s one of the best movies (not just comic book movies) this year yet you only gave it 8.5/10. In fact, you gave Iron Man 8.5/10 and surely you don’t think that Iron Man is one of the “best overall films” this year?
Jun 27th, 2008
John
Hey there Eric,
Yes, I said that FOR THE FIRST TWO HOURS of the film… then the film went too long (about a full 30 minutes too long), which reduced my enjoyment a touch.
But dude… how can you say “ONLY” an 8.5? That’s a great score!
Jun 27th, 2008
tom.
Awesome. Can’t wait.
Jun 27th, 2008
Eric
Hi John,
Thanks for the reply.
I dunno, it just seems like your review is slightly incongruous with your score especially because Iron Man got an 8.5 from you as well. Oh and 85% is an A- so it’s not that great :)
Jun 27th, 2008
John
Hey Eric,
Yeah… but Iron Man wasn’t 2.5 hours long… 30 minutes of which were really unnecessary.
Jun 27th, 2008
Nicolaas
ok, so IronMan wasn’t 2.5 hours long… but the action was indeed 5 minutes long, I really enjoyed it, but really… only 2 action scenes… is there a better balance in TDK?
Jun 27th, 2008
Sound Designer Dan
So you thought that Ledger’s perf was better than Downey in Iron Man?
Jun 27th, 2008
TreMayne
Hey man, my only question I hope you answer is do you think is-aight it’s a 2 parter-
a) is it better than Batman Begins?
b) best comic book film ever?
Thanks
Jun 27th, 2008
davide
(Type your comment here. Make sure you’ve read the commenting rules before doing so)
my dear jhon…it can’t be possible that Wanted is a better film than THIS Batman movie..you talk about Batman fantastically..but why..WHY?? 9 out 10 to Wanted an “only” 8.5 out 10 to batman…?? WHY?? ’cause the last bad 30-40 minutes are not a very good explanation..
your blog is my second bible..
bye davide..
Jun 27th, 2008
melbye
It seems the one thing i was worried about actually happens. But as long as the the rest of the movie is great it’s okay
Jun 27th, 2008
Kevin
No, it wasn’t better than Superman (1978). It was very good, but it lacked the epic scope, wit, and excitement of Superman.
I don’t want to knock Batman Begins, but I have to defend Superman. It’s a classic.
Jun 27th, 2008
TKT
HI JOHN!
Thanks a lot for the review.
9 FOR WANTED 8,5 FOR DARK KNIGHT??
WELL ITS YOUR OPINION ANIWAY
Why the lenght would have so much weight in the ”MOVIEBLOG”movie score,after all looks like its a hell of a movie.
30/7 IN NAGOYA … TAKING A DAY OFF…IM THERE,FIRST SESSION!!!
If you care to anwer me this:
THE NEW “BOBBAFETT”BATSUIT AND THE “SLIMER” BALE.
How they looked in the scream?
Its something you can note while seeing the movie?
Jun 27th, 2008
Ross Miller
John,
who gave a better performance as a villain; Heath Ledger as The Joker or Javier Bardem as Anton Chigurh?
Jun 27th, 2008
Logan
Hey John, One of the things I loved about Batman Begins is that “explains” a lot of things. Do they do that in this film?
Jun 27th, 2008
Jason
I gotta say that I was also surprised to see your score after reading the review - I expected to see a 9 or 9.5.
Been reading this blog for a long time and I hardly ever comment - just thought this deserved it.
Love the site - love the podcasts - keep up the good work, guys!
Jun 27th, 2008
Lando
I can’t believe Wanted would get a better score than this.
Jun 27th, 2008
Jeff H
i understand you didnt like the last 30 or 40 minutes of the film. or thought it was unnecessary, but you gave wanted a 9. you gave it a 9 after you said there were some scenes that were laughably unbelievable.
Just a little thrown, potential oscar performance, one of the best youve seen in the last 3 or 4 years and it gets an 8.5? it is your opinion, but shouldnt you have some sort of scale with which you grade things? a measure of standard?
Love the blog, honestly i do. checked it everyday when i was in afghanistan. THanks brother.
Jun 27th, 2008
Rob Forest
THE BAD
My biggest complaint about “The Dark Knight Review” is one that no one will agree with at first… but if you think about it after a while I think you’ll change your mind… at over 7min. 50sec. the review was too long. Sorry, it just was. At about the 5min. 20sec. mark I was ready to call “The Dark Knight Review” the best film review of the year so far… and maybe one of the top 5 movie reviews of the last 3 or 4 years. Yeah… THAT GOOD. Now, I have to be careful here to not give any spoilers away… so if some of this doesn’t make sense to you… it will after you see the review. After about the 5min. 20sec. mark, the major components of the movie review gets finished… and it was the PERFECT time to stop the movie review and move on to the next film review. PERFECT. But instead John felt the need to blabber on and on about how bad the last 30-40min. of the movie was… that was a big mistake in my opinion. All that energy, perfect pacing and focus that the movie review had for the first 5min. 20sec. got lost. Don’t get me wrong, it’s not that the last 2min. 23sec. were bad… they just were very redundant for this movie review. Something significant happens near the end (I can’t say what) that I believe was a total waste, and ultimately made the last 2min. 23sec. seem like an overstated and redundant waste of time.
Johns words were WASTED… and I don’t mean he was on drugs. He’s on screen for about 8min. After the first 5min. and 20 sec. he just starts to yammer on and on with no seemingly apparent rhyme or reason of where he is trying to go. Wheee… thanks for putting that out there. This may sound like a little bit of a spoiler, but it’s so redundant in the movie review that it really doesn’t matter. John can’t even end the review like a true super film reviewer. No no no… he gets too caught up in his own blah, blah, blah and yimmer-yammer really. There was no need for John’s words to be used in that capacity… you could have had the same review and had it be just about 2min. 23sec. shorter and it would have been exactly the same. Such a waste
Sorry John. No disrespect. Just feeling the need to point out the redundant nature of the end of your review.
Jun 27th, 2008
calviin
So numerically, Dark Knight is just as good as Iron Man, and not as good as Wanted.
Jun 27th, 2008
Paul
Hey john great review…got me soo pumped..but i just one small questions..which is a greater movie overall Ironman or TDK, since you did rate both of them the same. and Wanted is better than both?!?!..
Jun 27th, 2008
Grave
I dont care what John scored the film. Numbers and Letters are so unreliable when reviewing diffrent media. I like just to know what was good about the film and what was not good about the film. Im happy overall that the troubles with BB were fixed in this film. However John forgot to mention about the fighting in this Batman. He talk alot about how he didnt like most of the fighting in BB so i like to know if its much better in this film. So when your fist date with Ling?
Jun 27th, 2008
Paul Bliss
great review.. though i havent seen the film, i have to say that i like the idea of Scarecrow being brought down easily….it kinda makes it seem more realistic—not every criminal gets taken down it a dramatic scenario….take real life serial killers–sometimes cops just get lucky and there it is. I am hoping that it makes the film seem more realistic……like i said i havent seen it yet but thanks for the review and getting me geeked for the next three weeks to pass.
Jun 27th, 2008
Rob Forest
Sorry. I actually do have a question of interest for you. In your opinion, John, how does the new batsuit come accross in action and movement on the screen in TDK?
I have always had a problem with the way the fashion designers feel the need to “outdo” the last batsuit. For me the batsuit that the makers of “BATMAN: DEAD END” use is the best batsuit that can possibly be made. If you don’t know what I’m talking about here is a link to it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUdG0VFFNSU . I just don’t get why they always have to make it so fancy. It’s a simply costume design. It’s a classic costume design. That’s just me. So, yeah… What do you think about the outfit and how it comes accross on the screen.
NOT THAT THE WAY THE SUIT LOOKS IS GOING TO RUIN THE MOVIE FOR ME, IT IS JUST A MATTER OF PERSONAL TASTE AFTER ALL.
Jun 27th, 2008
John
Hey Guys,
Man… sorry, but I can’t help but giggle a little bit when people say “How can you give it a lower score than Wanted?” When they haven’t even seen Dark Knight yet.
Yes, I gave Wanted a 0.5 higher score than The Dark Knight… because… I enjoyed it 0.5 more. What can I say… the last 30 minutes really sucked a little steam out of my enjoyment.
NOW REMEMBER… I’m NOT saying the last 30 minutes were “bad”… there’s some good stuff in there… but it was unnecessary and made the movie start to drag after the first two hours. Some will disagree, but that’s my opinion and I’m not afraid to say regardless.
Still… AWESOME movie, Loved it, and I think you will too.
Jun 27th, 2008
Cinexcellence
I’m going to avoid this until I see it. :)
Jun 27th, 2008
TKT
FROM Rob Forest
Sorry. I actually do have a question of interest for you. In your opinion, John, how does the new batsuit come accross in action and movement on the screen in TDK?
FROM ME
THE NEW “BOBBAFETT”BATSUIT AND THE “SLIMER” BALE.
How they looked in the scream?
Its something you can note while seeing the movie?
Can you give us your opinion ?
it worked well?
Jun 27th, 2008
goodbar1979
John you lucky bastard :)
words cant explain how much i want to see this….21 days and counting…
Jun 27th, 2008
John
Ok, to answer some questions:
1) Did the new Bat suit work?
Yes. Actually the new design of the suit is a part of the story and is worked in well.
2) Is it better than Batman Begins?
In my opinion yes.
3) Was Ledger better than Downey Jr. was in Iron Man
In my opinion yes.
4) Is there another Super Villain introduced besides Two Face and The Joker?
No. Not that I noticed.
5) Was Ledgers performance better than Anton in No Country?
In my opinion… yes… just slightly.
Jun 27th, 2008
Meli
John - Thanks for the review and I’m stoked that you enjoyed the film so much.
I’m anxious for July 18th….I tell you the days are getting longer as my anticipation grows.
Jun 27th, 2008
krazie835
I can’t believe that they killed off the Scarecrow. That fucking sucks. =(
Jun 27th, 2008
Rob Forest
John answers the question:
1) Did the new Bat suit work?
Yes. Actually the new design of the suit is a part of the story and is worked in well.
…Hmmm. It’s interesting that they chose to make the new design an actual part of the story. I am actually happier about it now. Look forward to it and thanks for your response.
Jun 27th, 2008
Grant Berghoff
John,
About how long do you fully see Two Face on screen?
Jun 27th, 2008
Jeff
Hey John,
First off, great review. I enjoy not only hearing positive reviews but CRITICAL reviews, so this was really refreshing. However, you said that the movie went on for about 30 minutes “too long” after Joker’s story had been wrapped. I have a good guess as to what that additional 30 mins is about, and though I haven’t seen the film yet, Nolan has been quoted saying that TDK is Harvey Dent’s story, and that the Joker just cuts through the film like the shark in Jaws. While I’m not a critic and my opinion may/may not change after I watch the film, don’t you think you might have been just a little harsh on that assessment?
Jun 27th, 2008
Steven C.
Great review John, July 18th can’t come soon enough. It looks like The Dark Knight will make up for how much Indy 4 sucked.
Jun 27th, 2008
Darren J Seeley
“Was Ledger better than Downey Jr. was in Iron Man
In my opinion yes”
An apple to an orange. It would be a better comparison if Downey was a bad guy. A better comparison is “Heath better than Jack”. I should note that when you say “the mark so purely that even Batman himself is made to feel like a secondary character” it does ring a slight alarm bell with me because that was one of the main criticisms (not mine) of the 1989 Tim Burton film, in that the Nicolson Joker made the Keaton Batman look like a secondary character.
As for Scarecrow, if that’s the screen time, shit. I would rather like him to be in a jail cell next to Joker or one of Joker’s crew at least. Then again, Dawes took the dude out with a stun gun…
…the IMAX comment is a good one. Indeed, perhaps when ‘Dark Knight’ comes to a regular screening, let’s see if your opinion is changed any.
…and that’s where I have to stop. Because I cannot disagree or agree with you on the film at this time. As with most of the masses, I haven’t seen the film yet. But I *will* say this:
Whether or not I wind up agreeing with you, it is an excellent review. Hardly any spoilers, you focus on the actors, cinematography, script, second unit action (stunts), and the only spoiler you do give away indirectly (I’m not pointing it out if anyone missed it) is something that most of us had already suspected.
As for the rumors of “the third villain”. I always thought it was a nod to Scarecrow or a character like BB’s Zasz, or Gator is a codename for Croc, or something like that. But since there was discussion a few months ago about Deathstroke, I could have sworn I seen the character….
…in an ad for The Gotham Knight.
Jun 27th, 2008
HAZMAT
this suit looks amazing- waaay beter then any other batman suit ever used in a movie.
i wonder if theyll be bringing in a robin in the next one?
hey..
why not?
some of your responses to that question might be “batman forever”
but i think that it wouldnt be such a bad idea.
as long as they stay away from mr freeze and the ridler this time
Jun 27th, 2008
Steven C.
Hey John, did you hear another early review of TDK compared it to the Godfather 2 and Heat?
What do you think of that comparison?
Jun 27th, 2008
Kalpesh
Hello John,
Im new here, just have one question for you:
When is The Dark Knight releasing in INDIA ??
I tried to find out but there’s no information about its release….
I would love to watch this this movie first day after reading your REVIEW.
Thanks a lot,really appreciate your work & opinions.
Jun 27th, 2008
Grant Berghoff
Hey John,
Did Christian Bale’s physical size take away anything or did it not matter?
Jun 27th, 2008
JeFF
Stop giving the reviewer here a hard timem about DK’s 8.5 and Wanted’s 9.0..didn’t you guys know this website is “the official home of correct movie opinions”. He must be right.
In reality, his review was as awkward as his websites tagline. Half the review was about how we was afraid of the backlash he was going to get if he didn’t say he liked Ledger. Reminds me of a Harry Knowles review in which Hary spends half the review describing his wheelchair ride to the theater.
It’s a review, review the movie in confidence. If you are aware a review is just an opinion why worry about any backlash and why feel the need to address it.
Jun 27th, 2008
Zeus
I read a little of the review but I want to keep myself pumped for it and not read it all and get spoiled going into it, though I did notice the 8.5 rating out of 10. And hey I can live with it, I certainly stand by your rating as I have many other ratings you have for other flicks in the past.
I cannot wait though to see this myself :)
Jun 27th, 2008
parker
Im glad scarecrow goes down easy, he was a pussy, without that gas he was just a weak pathetic psychiatrist.
Jun 27th, 2008
Nixon
the dumbest review ever, you all should be shame for not giving 10 !!!!
Jun 27th, 2008
John
Hey Jeff,
I don’t think you understand what a “blog” is. Also, I don’t write academic reviews… I’m a film fan… and so I like to give context when I give my opinion on something.
Jun 27th, 2008
John
Hey Nixon,
Thank you for proving my point.
Jun 27th, 2008
AndyS
The Dark Knight could be 6hrs long and still not long enough for me, if the last 30mins is simply Bruce sitting in a chair dreaming about the Joker I would be fine with that. Just give me Dark Knight!!!
Someone said 85% is an A- well where I’m from that’s a B+ at best.
Jun 27th, 2008
Ty
Great review john, cant wait to see it, one thing thought, is there anyway u could tell us about the look of Two-Face without going into any spoilers, i simply must know, and an 8.5 is a great score and should be enough for anyone to go see the movie
Jun 27th, 2008
Phil Gee
Oh thank Crom, that’s all i have to say.
My only concern was that the fight scenes would not have moved on from ’shake ‘n confuso-vision’ that was in the first film but it looks like they have so i’m over the moon. That’s a shame about Scarecrow but i loved the character so much in Begins and what Cillian Murphy did with it, and was hungry for more of him by the end that i’ll probably just be happy to see him on screen again in this one, wasted or not; we’ll see.
@krazie835
John didn’t say Scarecrow got killed off. It might happen but John didn’t say that. He said ‘taken down’, he might just get arrested.
Jun 27th, 2008
Logan
Were there any cheesy parts? And was the story as well explained as Begins?
Thanks
Jun 27th, 2008
krazie835
I hope he is just arrested because I really liked the Scarecrow. I don’t want to see him get killed off.
Jun 27th, 2008
Cole
Maybe I missed it, but did John even mention Christian Bale once in his video review?
I think the more film savvy people out here knew the edgier, psychotic Joker that Ledger would play was going to be brilliant. But Bale was fantastic as Batman in the first movie so his lack of praise makes me feel like he got overshadowed.
Jun 27th, 2008
Joecool411
(The past decade has been this Movie Addicted 37 year old Comic Book Geek’s idea of Heaven on Earth!! And hell, as a kid I had SuperMan 2!!! 1 was cool but #2 set the bar at that time. “Kneel before ZOD!!” We all know how that worked out for him…
Fast Forward several years………. Burton’s BatMan blew my mind by treating my beloved Comics and in particular the most interesting and complicated hero (well actually he’s more of an angry as hell, revenge filled, psychotic vigillante that enjoys brutalizing Bad Guy’s) with a measure of respect and Jack was Jack, and that’s always fun! My expectations were raised far too high as I walked out of the theatre at 3 a.m. opening KNIGHT!! Sadly, Bat Nipples were what were on the way instead of the Bad Guys getting a share of the Darkest Dread. It was Comic Book fans who got that instead, thanks HollyWood!! It’s the thought that counts, right? Actually… Then from out of the shadows of cult obscurity “Somebody” actually put some darn “Thought” into a crazy idea for a Comic Book/G.Nov based movie and what can only be described as “Divine Intervention” for casting the main character came together and what resulted is; in my oppinion “THE” reason Comic Book fans have been having a blast since 2002. And though “THE CROW” has remained relevant all these years just becase they did it right in every possible way, Brandon Lee defined the entire experience. He Rocked and “Martial Arts” had nothing to do with it!! Since Heath’s passing I have “To a lesser degree” been feeling the return of that “Glorious, Excited, Hollow feeling Sorrow” I felt for some time before & after “The Crows” much delayed release and having my suspicions that Brandon Lee was very special and left us just after giving a “Legendary” performance verified with undeniable talent and a passion that I just knew was going to be matched by Heath Ledger before he passed away, then the irony. Why did we have to lose them so sudenly, tragically? I guess there job here was done maybe. They played the role they were born to play with perfection. Stunning you said, Stunning! I believe you! So, to John I say Thank You for your earlier than expected review and your honesty and what sounded like fairness! Now it’s Dejavu man!!For the second time that I can remember the anticipation of a film fills me with (At this moment) such excitement, anticipation, sorrow and sense of loss!! Brandon Lee’s “Eric Draven” haunts me “IN A GOOD WAY” even still, it appears that Heath Ledgers “Joker” is going to haunt us all now. Brilliantly!!! My point to all this? If Brandon& Heath and any like minded fans out there can “Feel Me” right now; I say “ROCK and ROLL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!” Let’s go to the movies, I’ll buy the PopCorn cuz it’s gonna be a Dark Knight!!)
Jun 27th, 2008
Paul
Hey, John! Love the review! Had a question. Is it too disturbing to take kids to see it? I remember when Batman Begins came out, some parents complained that it was too disturbing.
Jun 27th, 2008
John
Hey Paul,
YES! I would certainly say this movie is too disturbing for most children. I wouldn’t recommend taking your kids to it
Jun 27th, 2008
Wrenn
John, could you help me out here? I’ve been reading on multiple sites from multiple people who have seen the movie that a certain baddie bites it at the end. You’ve seemingly confirmed it in your review. What I want– nay, NEED– to know is, is the death concrete, or is it left open? Like, do we see a corpse? Or do the characters just THINK he’s dead? Great review, btw.
Jun 27th, 2008
John
Hey Wrenn,
Sorry man, I can’t confirm nor deny the death of any character in the movie… that would be a spoiler.
Jun 27th, 2008
Moe
Hey John…
Great review - can’t wait to see it.
One question: you and Doug often talk about movies running too long or how once they reach a certain point (either in time or in plot), that the movie should end.
How to you determine that? I’m certain there isn’t a scientific formula, but is there something that you notice or feel in films that tell you that it’s time to wrap it up?
One last question - you said that the last 30-40 minutes weren’t needed. But (without giving spoilers) do you feel that they built something in that last segment to start the third film from? Or better yet, do you think that there will even be a third film?
Thanks again. Love the Movie Blog.
Cheers.
Jun 27th, 2008
Wrenn
Aw, weak.
Jun 27th, 2008
Paul
So far, the reviews stack up as follows:
Movieblog 8.5/10
Rolling Stone 3.5/4
Jun 27th, 2008
Paul
Thanks for the response, John. I guess i’ll have to leave the kids at home for this one, and take my wife to see it. I have to say, this site is the best movie site out there, in my opinion. You guys are damn entertaining, and you guys are also extremely accessible. LOVE IT! Also, will we get Doug’s reaction to this movie as well???
Jun 27th, 2008
John
Hey Moe,
Every film is different as to when they should end… but I’ll say this…
Yes, the last 30 minutes do kinda set up for the next batman film… BUT…
If they ended the movie 30 minutes sooner, it would have been set up for the next film even BETTER.
Jun 27th, 2008
Jay E
John,
Overall the numbers don’t really matter since they are arbitrary assigned in relation to your opinion, and we are all going to see the movie anyways, but…
Would you say you gave “Wanted” a 9 because it was a fresh surprise and you didn’t expect it? And TDK an 8.5 because you had high expectations and it just barely didn’t hit the same mark as you wished?
I find that when I see movies I know nothing about and are blown away by them I give them higher “scores” (ex. The Matrix, Fifth Element). But when I see a movie that I have been anticipating for a long time I am much harder score-wise since it failed to fully meet my (absurd) expectations, even if it is a “better” movie than those that surprised me.
Hype and expectations are the bane of score-base opinions.
Jun 27th, 2008
Marla Singer
excellent review John!! you had all the references posted that i hoped you would mention. I’m very surprised to hear that character Daws is actually important. however, i’ve been peeing my pants with every whisper of this movie and when i get to see it i dont ever want it to end so i’m not so sure the extra half hour is going to lower my enjoyment so i give your review an 8.5 out of 10. LoL! looking forward to dougs reveiew too!
Jun 27th, 2008
John
Hey Jay E.
I understand what you’re saying… but…
No. I gave Wanted a 9 and The Dark Knight an 8.5 (both are excellent movies) because I just slightly enjoyed Wanted more. It’s a fantastic movie. My expectations or lack thereof had nothing to do with it.
On that point… I wasn’t expecting either movie to be as good as they turned out to be. I knew they’d both be “good”… but I didn’t think THIS good.
Jun 27th, 2008
George
One thing Nolan has said is that he wanted to make The Dark Knight as complete of a film as possible. Thus I think that is why the last 30 minutes were included in the film and not saved for a sequel.
Jun 27th, 2008
Vladimir Soto
Better than Donner’s Superman movie? You’ve got to be kidding me. Granted Batman Begins is brilliant and from what you’ve told us the same can be said about The Dark Knight. BUT I wouldn’t go so far and say it’s better than Donner’s masterpiece. I think the hype is clouding your judgement, not that I would blame you - it’s happened to me. But when things die down, watch Donner’s Superman film and remember.
Great review - keep up the good work!
Jun 27th, 2008
John
Hey George,
I see what you’re saying… but why not then make Dark Knight 4 hours long instead of just 2.5? Longer doesn’t mean “more complete”.
The movie (once you see it, you’ll know what I mean) was very complete after 2 hours.
Once again, it’s not that the last 30-40 minutes were bad… not at all… they were just unneeded excess that didn’t add to the film, and thus made it feel stretched out.
Jun 27th, 2008
JeffG
Hey John,
Nice review, I like a honst review even is there is negitive aspects towards the film (last half hour).
My question for you is: Was it THAT good? I mean was it a very dark movie? Also I am a fan of crime films, so I know that TDK is a superhero movie, but the crime aspect of the film, how does it stack up against others? And one more thing, how was Erron Eckheart, thats the one character I’m sceptical of. I just want to know if his performance is good and did two face seem kind of forced? I mean I want to see two face be givin a decent comic to film translation.
Again thank you for your review and help.
Jun 27th, 2008
Joey
John
great review. i just was curious what you thought of Anthony Michael Hall’s perfomance in the movie. I don’t want you to give anything away about the character or anything, just curious about your opinion of their performance.
Jun 27th, 2008
John
Hey Joey,
AMH is an actor I’d love to see make a major resurgence, so I was pretty pumped about him being in the flick. Unfortunately he just there. Nothing good nor bad to say about him… he was just there. Small role, nothing significant.
Jun 27th, 2008
Rob Forest
Joey…
Judge Anthony Michael Hall for yourself:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t1hc5iFPpSQ
Jun 27th, 2008
chef
John,
I dont think u understand the last 30min. this movie isnt about the joker(villain wise yes its about batman but) its about the rise and downfall of Harvey Dent. his transformation into two face in the final 30(not exactly just the final 30) is def needed in this movie. i understand that u think it should stop after the transformation and lead into the 3rd with that but it imp. that it goes on and show the things it did.
like the scene with gordon and two face, which is a powerful scene. i respect ur opinion but maybe u should watch the movie again and try to understand y nolan(a genius) put it in this movie….or maybe when u see the 3rd movie u’ll reconsider the last 30
Jun 27th, 2008
Roupen
Hey John, I don’t Believe you’ve actually watched this movie.
Tell Me Something to prove me wrong!
Jun 27th, 2008
Brian
I can’t wait to see what you give Wall-E a true classic.
Jun 27th, 2008
Dinobot77
Hey John,
I know you harped on the length of the movie. Yet, without giving any spoilers away, could it be construed that the movie was extended to bridge the gap between this and the next movie, due to Ledger’s death? We all know that Nolan wanted to use Ledger in the third movie. Unfortunately, those ideas were shattered due to Heath’s untimely death. Now obviously I have not seen the movie yet; but the extra 30 minutes could have been added to give the studio the new direction they needed. Nolan has repeatedly gone on record saying that they were looking for a way to bridge the gap and fill the void. If that were the case, then the first two hours could be considered pre-Ledger and the last 30-40 minutes could be considered post-Ledger.
This is all speculation on my part obviously, since I have not seen the movie yet. Yet, one has to wonder if the last part of the movie was not added in response to his death.
Jun 27th, 2008
790
Hmmm I had a pretty good source confirm the Riddler would be at the end ???
Jun 27th, 2008
Andy
John, just a quick administrative question. I do reviews for the Herald Journal in Logan, Utah, about 90 miles north of Salt Lake City. When I go to screenings, they specifically tell us not to publish our reviews until the day of release. I’m not seeing this until July 16th. Doesn’t the studio get huffy when you do the review a few weeks early, or do they give you permission. Just wondering.
BTW, I totally agree with your “Wanted” review. I’m excited to see “The Dark Knight” now too.
Jun 27th, 2008
Sir Jig-A-Lot
I knew Nolan was gonna botch it on the runtime of the film. I felt the same way about the MOST of the last 20 minutes of Begins. He can’t help himself. It’s why Insomnia sucked elephant balls.
Thanks for confirming this,Campea. Iron Man is still at the top of the mountain. Only Hellboy II might still match or outdo it this year.
Jun 27th, 2008
John
Hey Andy,
When a studio asks you in advance not to print a review until a certain date, that’s called an “embargo” and you should honor that.
Jun 27th, 2008
Darren J Seeley - that's with a "J" and a "Y"
@Paul
Interesting you brought up Rolling Stone. If nothing else, Peter Travers also thinks Ledger should be in the running for a posthumous Oscar.
Now, I just got back from ‘Wanted’. It was better than I thought it would be…and, to each his own I guess, but if ‘Wanted’ is more satisfying than ‘Dark Knight’, we are royally fucked.
Jun 27th, 2008
DarthMuppet
Hey John,
I’m not really sure if anyone else here has addressed this yet, and I’m really in a pinch for time and can’t scroll through all 87 comments to make sure so…
Anyway, I’ve always thought that the score for BB was vastly underrated… I thought that it fit the tone of that movie perfectly. Being somewhat of a lover of movie scores, what I’m curious about is what you thought of the score for TDK. Was it about the same as BB, was it better, or was it not as good?
Thanks.
Jun 27th, 2008
Billy
Hey, I saw what you said about Anthony Micheal Hall earlier, but do you think that he was good enough in the film to stand out at all. I’m a big “The Dead Zone” fan and with a little bit of talk about a possible movie to wrap up the series correctly I was hoping that he could get some notice in this film and like you said have a major resurgence.
Jun 27th, 2008
James
Would you rate Heath’s performance better than Jack’s or not. I’ve always thought Jack was good, but he didn’t make Joker that scary, just awkward and kind of weird. Heath seems to have that, but also the violence and creepiness.
Jun 27th, 2008
Linus
(Type your comment here. Make sure you’ve read the commenting rules before doing so)
Thanks for the review John! Keep up the good (great!) work! Can’t wait for this movie to come out in Sweden …
Jun 27th, 2008
Zach
John your one lucky son of a bitch for seeing this so soon…I’ve already pre-ordered my imax tickets and am absolutley dying to see this thing mainly for Heath Ledger’s preformance.. great review by the way
Jun 27th, 2008
Raddy
Hey John,
I enjoyed youre review and do agree with you that when certain movies run too long it does kill there potential, example: pirates movies. loved those movies (yes even the third one) but obviously they were too long, but my question to you is, i agree that some people definitely jumped on the “heath ledger is awesome” bandwagon after he passed away, but why go into the movie not expecting him to do a good of a job as everyone thought?
Jun 27th, 2008
Alexis Lopez From Argentina
John,
You just made the “I hate People that saw TDK before me” list.
Jun 27th, 2008
Andee23
Great review John, can’t wait until this film comes out I’ve already purchased my tickets and am counting down the days.
July 18th get here soon.
Jun 27th, 2008
Ty
Hey John
I was wonderin if the transformation from Harvey Dent to Two-Face worked at all in the movie, if u can try to explain without spoilers, and was the look of Two-Face even more gruesome than you thought.
Jun 27th, 2008
790
If this thread is any indication on how TDK will do opening weekend I’d say its about to break the 100 mil mark / post mark.
So John are you flat out saying that the Riddler is NOT in the film?
(Hope you expected all these questions). ;-)
Also, there were stories of Heath delivering an Oscar worthy performance before he died, so yeah I think he will get nominated and I think he’s going to win. He will also prob win The Peoples Choice, Mtv award and possibly a Golden Globe. Just a vibe.
I remember when the first Batman came out it was the same thing. Nicolson stole the film and made more of an impression than Keaton.
Jun 27th, 2008
Atlas Cerise
I don’t see how the movie can be *over* 2.5 hours long since IMAX reels are limited to 2.5 hours worth of film. How much over are you talking?
Jun 27th, 2008
TJ
hey John I haven’t heard much about Two-Face and you didn’t even mention him in the review. I’m assuming he becomes two-face in those last 30 minutes your talking about. So I get u can’t talk about that. But i’d like to know how well the Dent character plays out.
Because if I remember Nolan stated that “The Joker wasn’t really the main villian just a force of nature that occurs throughout the film”. If you could elaborate a bit it would be great, without revealing any spoilers of course.
Jun 27th, 2008
Larry
I just saw it.
I’m older than most of you so my perspective is no doubt different. Bottom line: I hated it. If you’re expecting Batman Begins, you’re in for a completely different experience.
Agreed; it’s too long. Should have been 1/2 hour shorter.
Story is ok, but way too many tangents and characters which simply disappear. This contributes to the bloated extra 30 minutes.
Ledger gives a fine performance, but this character is so heartless that you just lose empathy for him.
The violence was over the top. For me, this was a “just because you can doesn’t mean you should” scenario. The movie didn’t feel like a comic book brought to the screen; rather, an action/drama with characters in wild costumes.
No chemistry at all between Bale/Gyllenhall/Eckhart.
Most of you will think I’m out of my mind for hating it. I hope you have a wonderful time with it. If you’ve already decided you’re going to love it, then you’ll pick it as your number one film of the summer. For the rest of us….yawn.
One last thing. Not a spoiler, but…you’ll LOVE the origin of the Batcycle!
Enjoy the popcorn
L
Jun 27th, 2008
Sahil
Nixon
“the dumbest review ever, you all should be shame for not giving 10 !!!!”
I dont have any questions but I do have to say that Nixon is a fucking twat.
How do you figure that this movie gets a 10? All you have seen is about 5 mins of a movie that is 2 hrs and 30 mins long.
Jun 28th, 2008
Sahil
John
I did think of a question…..
Would this be a movie that you would watch more than once in theaters?….that is if you had to pay for your tickets.
I have a bet going with a few friends for $700 that Indy4 will make more money than The Dark Knight. When I made that bet back in April I was 100% confident that I was right but now I am not so confident and after reading some of the early reviews I feel like Batman actually has a shot. So what do you think John? Was I stupid for making that bet?
Jun 28th, 2008
Perrry Rampant
This movie is so awesome ive seen it
Jun 28th, 2008
Kalpesh
Hello John,
Im new here, just have one question for you:
When is The Dark Knight releasing in INDIA ??
Jun 28th, 2008
790
First, thanks Larry for that perspective. I can relate to your pov. I’ll still see it, but interesting POV non the less. (Btw, I hope your wrong). ;-)
sahil, Nixon has an opinion, why don’t you go suck your thumb bra?
Jun 28th, 2008
Dragonslayer
Where’s the Wall-E review? That movie was awesome!
Jun 28th, 2008
FredMillerTurdMonkey
yes Wall-E was amazing…give it a 10 already.
Jun 28th, 2008
Sahil
790
Nixon has a opinion about a movie thats not even out yet and on top of that he is judging John for his opinion.
Jun 28th, 2008
jumpman
(Type your comment here. Make sure you’ve read the commenting rules before doing so)
Jun 28th, 2008
jono
(i cant belive u think wanted is better than the dark knight and yes ive seen bothType your comment here. Make sure you’ve read the commenting rules before doing so)
Jun 28th, 2008
790
F_ck_ng tw_at is pretty harsh man. That’s all.
Jun 28th, 2008
jumpman
I was wondering how was Christian Bale’s performance, does he make the batman role his own, or was he better in begins.
Since this movie is being compared to HEAT in some ways, do we get to see 2 great performances from bale and ledger( like pacino and de niro) or is it all about the joker.
Jun 28th, 2008
Raddy
Hey John,
I enjoyed your review and do agree with you that when certain movies run too long it does kill there potential, example: pirates movies. loved those movies (yes even the third one) but obviously they were too long, but my question to you is, i agree that some people definitely jumped on the “heath ledger is awesome” bandwagon after he passed away, but why go into the movie not expecting him to do a good of a job as everyone thought?
Jun 28th, 2008
John
Hey Raddy,
I never said I expected him NOT to do a good job.
Jun 28th, 2008
_ram-jaane'
So you’ve addressed 2 of my concerns with TDK:
- a) over-hype of Ledger
- b) duration
I have one more that perhaps you could shed some light on:
- c) Batman being over-shadowed performance-wise, hence making Batman ‘less’ cool than he was in Batman Begins.
Jun 28th, 2008
Zach
Hey John,
I’m curious to know what rating you would of given this movie if it didn’t have the 30-40 minutues of which you felt were unneeded.
Cheers.
Jun 28th, 2008
FredMillerTurdMonkey
So Joker is killed and we are left with 30-40 minutes of Two-Face development so we can have a full out war with him on the next film. Sounds alright with me.
Jun 28th, 2008
pigeon
Hey John
You think any Batman sidekick will ever appear in THIS Batman franchise?
Jun 28th, 2008
joseph
all i need to know is twoface good and not a waste of time
Jun 28th, 2008
Rob Forest
This from MovieWeb.com …
“While conducting interviews with the cast of The Dark Knight this afternoon, I got a chance to chat with director Christopher Nolan and Gary Oldman about the proposed third segment of their supposed Batman trilogy… When asked if he thought they should recast Ledger for the third film, or just not include the character, Gary thought it was a good idea…
Oldman then took a moment to think about it some more, “Maybe we don’t need the Joker. Because we’ll have The Riddler.” Yes, Oldman alluded to the fact that The Riddler may in fact be the next on-screen Batman villain.”
I personally got this information from WE ARE MOVIE GEEKS.com and you can view the full post with a cool “fan made” poster for the film HERE!
Jun 29th, 2008
Paul
Whay are you supposed to feel empathy for the joker??? He’s a maniac!
Jun 29th, 2008
Raddy
Oh. Sorry if i was mistaken, but that’s what I got from your review.
Jun 29th, 2008
Mark-Anthony Cardenas
John How was it in Imax with the 6 scenes shot with the Imax Camera
and John Is The Dark Knight In 3-D?
Thank Mark
P.S Great Review John you rule.
Jun 29th, 2008
Lauren
Hey John,
I assuming we are supposed to get chills from Heath’s performance? I’ve seen a couple of clips from the movie and, though they definitely weren’t enough to say anything about the acting cause they were so short, they certainly gave me some goose pimples.
And I have a question that goes along with Paul’s question from a couple of days ago. What under what age would you recommend not taking a child? I’m just a little concerned for my 10 year old sister, who, obviously, hasn’t built up a tolerance for disturbing images, though she did do OK with the hallucination scenes of Begins.
Thanks,
Lauren
Jun 29th, 2008
John
Defiantly, no question about it. I’m going to see it. 3 and a half stars!!!!! I can’t believe it!!!!!! Gotta see it!
Jun 30th, 2008
goodbar1979
heres 2 more positive reviews that showed up on Rotten tomatoes this weekend
http://movies.ign.com/articles/884/884876p1.html
http://emanuellevy.com/article.php?articleID=10176
Damn they both loved it…July 18th can’t come soon enough
I’m thinking 100-110 million opening weekend :)
Jun 30th, 2008
FredMillerTurdMonkey
IF it is as good as I hope and expect….see it multiple times to bump up the revenue for it! Make this the biggest grossing movie ever! Shitty Spidey 3
Jun 30th, 2008
Joshua Hayes
The review seems to take an objective approach with both the first two hours followed by the final thirty minutes with a subjective preference as to where it should have ended, which I respect. As much as Ang Lee’s HULK was a bad movie and certainly doesn’t merit comparison, I felt it could have stood as an average psychological portrait- then they brought the “father” back in for a final battle scene and the movie went from, IMO, a 5/10 to a 2/10 due to how unnecessary the ending scenes were.
In this case, the reviewer knocks it 0.5 but still rewards an excellent score. Whether some choose to see it in the same subjective way as John does is up to them, but at the very least he justifies his position and explains. No matter the circumstance though:
This reaffirms my unhealthy anticipation (almost nervous anticipation) for “The Dark Knight!” Can’t wait!
Jun 30th, 2008
George
how is i possible that you saw the movie before all of us?
I believe what you are saying is correct (about how it is too long) but how can i fully believe your review if it could just be made up as it hasn’t been released yet?
How and where did you see TDK?
By now your probably guessing that i am very jealous that you have seen it. Its so close yet so far. =[
Jul 1st, 2008
Travis
I think The Scarecrow would be necessary because he was left on the run at the end of Batman Begins and people will wonder what happened to him. And obviously making him a main villain wouldn’t work.
Jul 1st, 2008
rob H
What part does gambol play in the film? the black gangster
Jul 2nd, 2008
Giovanni
Hello John, GREAT reviews. I am now hungrier for Batman than ever.
Please riddle me this: I am a musician so it is one of my favorite things to collect soundtracks from movies i love. Why haven’t you talked about the great job Newton Howard and Hans Zimmer have done for for this franchise.
The score man, why didn’t you mention it?
Jul 2nd, 2008
Philippines
We are very excited for this movie here in our country. By the way are there any hints of AMH becomming The Riddler? I think Riddler would work very well in Nolan’s World. He can be played like the Zodiac killer.
Jul 3rd, 2008
Kevski
Here’s the confusion I think many of the visitor’s to your site are having with your rating of TDK and Wanted… it just doesn’t seem to have any order. Meaning, if Heath Ledger’s performance is Oscar worthy and TDK transcends its genre… how is it that “Wanted” gets a higher score or even the same rating as TDK? Wanted was neither transcendent for its genre nor were any of the performances even near Oscar worthy. These two films are not even on the same planet artistically… so the order of things would have you believe that TDK would be rated higher. You simply confused the order… that’s all.
Jul 3rd, 2008
movie.guy.clerk
the dark knight well be a great movie to watch i think the batman movie are all great and im looking forward to see heath ledger in this movie………………………………………………….
Jul 3rd, 2008
Javier
Personally I think theres to much hype for this movie,and we expect to be delivered with the greatest movie to come out in a long time.As a result of that we analyze and critique all of the aspects of the movie according with how we felt (obviously).Im not saying that John’s review was bad,but thats his opinion(freaking 8.5 out of 10 my a@#…).Go into the movie with an open mind,and dont worry about the half hour gone wrong…is CHRIS NOLAN,there must be a reason.
10/10!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Ledger rest in peace.
Jul 3rd, 2008
Rod
I don’t know what the fuss about movie length is, I really don’t. Does a movie have to have a limit on length? Like a song has to be 4min long? Some of my favorite songs are over 10min long. Among my favorite films of all time are Munich (over 3hrs) and Apocalypse Now Redux (about 4hrs or more!)
It’s not the length of your movie, it’s how you use it! I’ll be my own judge come July 18th… 14 days and counting. I gotta find some long movies to help kill the time in between…
Jul 3rd, 2008
Double A
I’m sorry John but I too got to see a special screening of “TDK” and I have to disagree with you about ‘being to long’. The last 30 mins was perfect for this movie. The Rise and Fall of a great person becoming this horrible monster (Two-Face) is great for the movie. I have to say with strong feelings, you’re wrong John.
Jul 4th, 2008
Mel Hastings
I haven’t seen ‘TDK’ yet, though at this point I believe John’s score rating to be a little off. I haven’t even seen ‘Wanted’ (rated higher than ‘TDK’), though, to be honest, I’m not over excited to see it at all. ‘TDK’ is going to be a great movie and will no doubt be better than ‘Batman Begins’ (even though I love this movie). I just wish that Katie Holmes reprised her role for this film, as it would give ‘TDK’ the continuity that the ‘Spider-man’ movies have (especially if they complete the trilogy that has been suggested)…Nevermind. For the rest of the cast, Heath looks great as The Joker and it will be interesting to see if he does get the Oscar that he apparently deserves. Bale will not disapoint, as he did a good job in ‘BB’ and everyone else will no doubt be impressive (Caine, Oldman etc). My only concern is that Nolan should finnish what he’s started. I’m dreading someone else taking over the frachise and screwing it all up. If Nolan passes on the next one they may give it to a less passionate director and spoil the series. Whoops Goyer co-wrote ‘BB’ and ‘TDK’…If he takes over then we’ve had it (Blade Trinity). Will someone, who has Christopher Nolan connections, please encourage him to direct one more Bat-flick, just so we have the trilogy every Bat-fan has been waiting for since they left the cinemas after watching ‘Batman Returns’?
Jul 5th, 2008
Josh Lamb
I got my ticket and am pumped for the midnight showing opening night! I hope I haven’t set my standards too high but will find out in a week and a half.
Jul 5th, 2008
Hector
You honestly think Wanted is a better movie than The Dark Knight. I AM OUTRAGED!!! Wanted had so many holes it was disgusting. I also thought the pacing for the movie was terrible and it did not effectively build to any climatic scenes. Also a magic loom?!?!?!?! Change The Dark Knight’s score to 9.2 and Wanted to a 7.1. OMG!
Jul 6th, 2008
aaron
hey john, i agree with your review, i’m seeing it on opening day and cannot wait, but i’m gonna ask a question, and i asked this on movie blog. who do you really think is the main character here, i know it’s a batman film. but who is REALLY the main character?
Jul 7th, 2008
aaron
larry, i don’t mean this in a bad way, but there is no “the rest of us” we all want to see this film so bad we’d pay $30 for it. you said you were alot older, so maybe it’s for a younger crowd (again, i mean that in a good way). i think the target audience is for teens, and most people seeing it will be teens.
Jul 7th, 2008
John
Hey Aarron,
ummm… yes there is a “rest of us”. Unless Dark Knight makes $2 billion at the box office, then there are other people out there who think like Larry do.
Jul 7th, 2008
aaron
you have a good point
Jul 7th, 2008
aaron
so john who do you thnik is the mian character in this one? joker or batman
Jul 7th, 2008
Billy
CAN SOMEONE JUST PLEASE CLEAR UP WHETHER THE SCARECROW DIES OR IS JUST ARRESTED????
Jul 7th, 2008
aaron
wow i think im gonna love this film so much
Jul 7th, 2008
Kate
I heard that Regal Cinemas is going to show the Dark Knight all night long starting Thursday at midnight, almost like a Star Wars.
Guess they are as hyped about it as the rest of us.
Can’t wait to see it. Watched the first 5 minutes on the web and I’m hooked from there. Even if the last 30 are irrelevant, I’m still game. Marking the 18th on the calendar!
Jul 8th, 2008
aaron
i agree with you kate, yeah i watched the first 5 too and they couldn’t have started it better! but they left us hanging, if only they gave us the movie now…..
Jul 8th, 2008
Billy
John, can you please clarify what exactly happens to Scarecrow, I must know!!! He’s my favorite villain!!!
Jul 8th, 2008
Joseph
This is the best review i’ve read of it. I liked the video review, too. I hope the last 30-40 minutes don’t make me leave feeling unfufilled.
Jul 8th, 2008
DAVID
Hi John,
Good review. We in Hong Kong cannot wait for the Dark Knight to show on the 17th. Many of my friends will see it since we are fans of the first movie. I guess most of us are really anticipating to see Heath Ledgers performance and one that hopefully will be unforgettable. I did watch “Wanted” but really didn’t enjoy it that much so I guess each person has there individual opinions so I am not all that concerned that “Wanted” got a 9.0. However I did enjoy RDJr’s performance in Iron Man. I am thinking that “TDK” will hit over 100 million in its first 3 days of screening.
Jul 8th, 2008
Paul
Sorry, but Wanted is nothing but a pop flick with flashy effects and large breasts… I have no idea how anyone could give it a 9 and then give TDK an 8.5 … Wanted is a 7 at best!
Jul 9th, 2008
Mike Sandy
Hello, Loved the review, good job. The one thing I must ask, is what you believe led to so much speculation to having about 4 villains in this movie. I’m not telling you to give it staright out to me, otherwise i’ll have no hype when i go see, but i just need to have some idea as to why their was a such a huge villain group created over the net, when theirs only 2, along with a 3rd cameo.
Write back please
Jul 11th, 2008
aaron
i’m sorry john but i can’t see wanted being better, but thats just my opinion. i know i haven’t seen this, yet. i agree wnated was friggin awesome, and the effects were breath taking! but i just think TDK will be better
Jul 12th, 2008
Whoawhatwasthat?
yup, cinco mas dias till the man of bat comes to your cavernous hideout called a theater. My question to John is, do they have a special dedication to Heath Ledger at the end of the movie, like an “In Memory of..” kind of thing? Oh yeah check out the masks they have of the clown dudes from the movie. They’re like $15 online at some Halloween site. Definitely something I’m looking at purchasing, like all 7 of em. Sweet. R.I.P Heath Ledger.