Sahara Reviews

Sahara_Poster.jpgOver the last couple of years I’ve started to become a Matthew McConaughey fan. The guy has a killer on screen charm to go with loads of talent that I think we’re all just starting to see. So it should come as no surprise that I’m looking forward to seeing Sahara.

The reviews for the film are starting to filter in now… and not surprisingly the review are like the trailer, mixed but leaning towards positive. Here’s what some of the critics have to say:

“As Hollywood actioners go these days, this one’s quite tolerable in its guilty-pleasure way. Feel free to saddle up.”
Peter Canavese, GROUCHO REVIEWS

” Breck Eisner’s youthful, fresh grasp of the high-adventure genre. This should have been his audition reel for helming 007/21. ”
Victoria Alexander, FILMSINREVIEW.COM

Overall it’s sounding like a fun summer brainless flick. I’m in. Add on top of that the fact that it also has Delroy Lindo and William H. Macy and it’s a solid cast overall… now if they could just edit out Penelope Cruz.

Comment with Facebook

9 thoughts on “Sahara Reviews

  1. Vilmer, hu,hu,hu
    I hated McConaughey first time I saw Contact, he gave me the same feeling Brad Pit did Pre Seven – Talentless Prettyboy.

    Hes really funny in The texas chainsaw massacre the next generation.

    Sahara looks shit!
    Flight of the Phoenix, Sahara, Hidalgo – are these people sharing scripts & planning to make themed movies or what?

  2. “Overall it’s sounding like a fun summer brainless flick. I’m in.”

    The same reasons why I am seeing the film too. *smiles* McConaughey was great in “A Time to Kill.”

  3. I will always remember him as Boonhauer in Dazed & Confused. Though I liked him a lot in Reign of Fire.
    Sahara looks tedius but I like to think a bit during my mindless entertainment.

  4. It’s a bit rubbish, actually. No, make that really quite rubbish. Too dumb to actually care about, but it nonetheless takes itself so seriously that it never manages to be a proper romp. And yes, Cruz just pouts confusedly all the way through.

    Also, it has the worst movie science since The Core. Not just because it’s ludicrously nonsensical, which isn’t such a problem, but because it’s a key plot device that they were too lazy to even bother trying to make it believable.

Leave a Reply