Comments on: Two New Matrix Films coming in 3D?

By: Jason Youngman

Jason Youngman — Sun, 12 Jan 2014 15:47:11 +0000

i carnt beleive every1 is dissin the matrix i wud lv to c them make another matrix i think it wud be a big hit just like the last sequal

By: marian

marian — Mon, 26 Sep 2011 12:48:08 +0000

He starts the new matrix

By: Mikey1993

Mikey1993 — Wed, 27 Jul 2011 05:04:54 +0000

What..? You guys are all crazy. The matrix is the best movie series ever. I pray t
hat they make two more!

By: vargas

vargas — Thu, 10 Feb 2011 04:06:15 +0000

The only one that matters in my mind is the first one.

By: TheSwede

TheSwede — Mon, 31 Jan 2011 09:24:48 +0000

I think the problem with the sequels was that the 1st one ended, although with a semi-open endning. But still… it had a end that closed the deal.

What they should have done with the sequels was to cut Smith and kept the story a bit lighter. I thought that the whole thing with “god” or whatever was just to pretentious. Also I never bought in to all the problems Neo faced during fights and stuff after tearing UP smith in the end at the 1st.

By: Edvin

Edvin — Thu, 27 Jan 2011 11:03:12 +0000

Two was everything I wanted from a sequel, three… ugh, to much Zion not enough Matrix. I loved the Agent Smith Neo stuff, but everything else was just wtf?

By: Kevin C

Kevin C — Tue, 25 Jan 2011 23:07:44 +0000

Its being reported that this was a hoax…yet oddly, I hope its not.

By: Matt S.

Matt S. — Tue, 25 Jan 2011 21:17:30 +0000

In reply to Slushie Man. Yea I never really understood the reason for such hatred for the sequels. I liked all three and I say bring 2 more on, as long as they make non-3D versions in the theater, so us cheap people don't miss out.

By: Bruce

Bruce — Tue, 25 Jan 2011 20:44:46 +0000

In reply to yigal. Unfortunately for them, Daniel Day-Lewis already drank it all up.

By: Andy

Andy — Tue, 25 Jan 2011 18:16:15 +0000

I wouldn’t mind a 4th and a 5th as it would give them a chance to make up for the mess which was the 2nd and 3rd movie. But if all they do is knock out some overly twisted and incomprehensible storyline just as a vehicle to bring the action in 3D then I wouldn’t bother.

By: fritzilla

fritzilla — Tue, 25 Jan 2011 08:43:42 +0000

In reply to cloud720.

cloud720,

I agree. When I watched the first one I was impressed with the potential. I liked the movie but was dying to see more of the “real” world, the devastated Earth, the robots, and some real action.

Then I saw the second one and was like, “wait a minute, this is written pretty well.” It got much deeper than I expected it to. By the end with the Architect I was really intrigued by the possibilities it could go philosophically. A bunch of friends of mine all talked about it at length.

Then the third one came out and now I wanted to see some answers and really unique high level philosophy. However, what I got was a lot more action than I wanted. All of the sudden I got a movie a lot more like what I wanted to see after part 1 but not anymore. It was a weird set of experiences.

However, I loved them all and really cherish the trilogy. I wouldn’t mind seeing a new set of sequels as long as they have a good reason to bring back Neo. Three really summed it up but two more could ruin the epic feeling left by the original trilogy. (wow did I just invoke “original trilogy” for something other than Star Wars?).

By: fritzilla

fritzilla — Tue, 25 Jan 2011 08:32:25 +0000

In reply to Slushie Man. I absolutely agree. I liked the second one the most due to the additional layers of philosophy they created. While I don't think 3 went the direction I hoped (too much action and less wrapping up the questions posed by the second one) I still liked it and the whole trilogy. I know Matrix-hat'n is the hip thing but I would say bring on two more with Neo and I am in!