<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Saw VI Teaser Trailer Online	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/09/saw-vi-teaser-trailer-online-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/09/saw-vi-teaser-trailer-online-2/</link>
	<description>The Correct Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 06:40:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ty		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/09/saw-vi-teaser-trailer-online-2/#comment-222430</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 06:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=21733#comment-222430</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/09/saw-vi-teaser-trailer-online-2/#comment-222365&quot;&gt;prahanormal&lt;/a&gt;.

I think the carousel is what makes it disturbing. Personally, when I think of it, I think of when I was younger..when I&#039;d play games on it (and fall off, haha).

What makes the carousel so disturbing, IMO, is that they can take something that you associate with children and/or childhood and turn it into a deathtrap. Personally, I think that&#039;s more effective than have each arm and leg attached to a car driving in an opposite direction.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/09/saw-vi-teaser-trailer-online-2/#comment-222365">prahanormal</a>.</p>
<p>I think the carousel is what makes it disturbing. Personally, when I think of it, I think of when I was younger..when I&#8217;d play games on it (and fall off, haha).</p>
<p>What makes the carousel so disturbing, IMO, is that they can take something that you associate with children and/or childhood and turn it into a deathtrap. Personally, I think that&#8217;s more effective than have each arm and leg attached to a car driving in an opposite direction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: prahanormal		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/09/saw-vi-teaser-trailer-online-2/#comment-222365</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[prahanormal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 23:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=21733#comment-222365</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was almost interested, than I saw the carousal.

Pssst, Saw writers. Billy is only the face of saw, you don&#039;t have to go with the clown gimmick.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was almost interested, than I saw the carousal.</p>
<p>Pssst, Saw writers. Billy is only the face of saw, you don&#8217;t have to go with the clown gimmick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Matt		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/09/saw-vi-teaser-trailer-online-2/#comment-222235</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 12:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=21733#comment-222235</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The thing about the Saw franchise is that they have a niche of moviewatchers and enough loyal fans (like me) who allow the film to earn 20+ million or so the first weekend, do reasonably well a couple weeks after that, and then tank, but still make a decent profit because the films are so low budget. Sort of like guaranteed &quot;money in the bank&quot; for Lionsgate.

I was not a huge fan of Saw V, but will certainly be going to see the sixth just because I&#039;m hoping the writers can pull off a nice twist like in the earlier movies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing about the Saw franchise is that they have a niche of moviewatchers and enough loyal fans (like me) who allow the film to earn 20+ million or so the first weekend, do reasonably well a couple weeks after that, and then tank, but still make a decent profit because the films are so low budget. Sort of like guaranteed &#8220;money in the bank&#8221; for Lionsgate.</p>
<p>I was not a huge fan of Saw V, but will certainly be going to see the sixth just because I&#8217;m hoping the writers can pull off a nice twist like in the earlier movies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jay		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/09/saw-vi-teaser-trailer-online-2/#comment-222150</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 01:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=21733#comment-222150</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This has been up for ages now. Surprised you just got it.

Saw 1 Ace
Saw 2 Ace
Saw 3 Good
Saw 4 Ace
Saw 5 Poor]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has been up for ages now. Surprised you just got it.</p>
<p>Saw 1 Ace<br />
Saw 2 Ace<br />
Saw 3 Good<br />
Saw 4 Ace<br />
Saw 5 Poor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Grave		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/09/saw-vi-teaser-trailer-online-2/#comment-222144</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 23:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=21733#comment-222144</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I loved and still have the first film. The second one was ok but overall disappointing. I always told myself that I keep watching if the endings were intresting enough to want to see the next film. Well SAW 5 was the failure. The ending was so week and you can see it coming a mile away. SAW 6.. not intrested.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved and still have the first film. The second one was ok but overall disappointing. I always told myself that I keep watching if the endings were intresting enough to want to see the next film. Well SAW 5 was the failure. The ending was so week and you can see it coming a mile away. SAW 6.. not intrested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: NoName		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/09/saw-vi-teaser-trailer-online-2/#comment-222118</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NoName]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 19:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=21733#comment-222118</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Saw getting old.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Saw getting old.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ty		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/09/saw-vi-teaser-trailer-online-2/#comment-222105</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=21733#comment-222105</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/09/saw-vi-teaser-trailer-online-2/#comment-222041&quot;&gt;obi-wan kubrick&lt;/a&gt;.

Yeah, this is old. They DID have the carousel clip, but Lionsgate&#039;s (the last time I checked) was taking those down.

..Probably because fans were hardcore analyzing it and figuring stuff out before the film was released. It&#039;s refreshing to not know everything.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/09/saw-vi-teaser-trailer-online-2/#comment-222041">obi-wan kubrick</a>.</p>
<p>Yeah, this is old. They DID have the carousel clip, but Lionsgate&#8217;s (the last time I checked) was taking those down.</p>
<p>..Probably because fans were hardcore analyzing it and figuring stuff out before the film was released. It&#8217;s refreshing to not know everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: BeautifulMess		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/09/saw-vi-teaser-trailer-online-2/#comment-222068</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BeautifulMess]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=21733#comment-222068</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Has anyone else noticed that that classic &quot;saw music&quot; that accompanies all the movies has been showing up in previews for other movies? Valkerie used it and now that The Box movie that is coming out with Cameron Diaz and James Marsden has it. It bugs me. I guess it doesn&#039;t BELONG to the saw franchise but I sure associate the two.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone else noticed that that classic &#8220;saw music&#8221; that accompanies all the movies has been showing up in previews for other movies? Valkerie used it and now that The Box movie that is coming out with Cameron Diaz and James Marsden has it. It bugs me. I guess it doesn&#8217;t BELONG to the saw franchise but I sure associate the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: David Lopan		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/09/saw-vi-teaser-trailer-online-2/#comment-222066</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Lopan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=21733#comment-222066</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Stopped supporting this franchise years ago]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stopped supporting this franchise years ago</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ty		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/09/saw-vi-teaser-trailer-online-2/#comment-222057</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=21733#comment-222057</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/09/saw-vi-teaser-trailer-online-2/#comment-222022&quot;&gt;AB&lt;/a&gt;.

I think five was a pure &#039;filler&#039; for the SAW franchise. I agree that 5 was definitely a &quot;wtf&quot; movie, with the choosing of the random group of people...and it MIGHT explain their real purpose of being in the movie (there&#039;s a screenshot of Jill pinning up pictures of the victims, along with their tapes, on a wall).

But I guess they&#039;re there because of the scandal they all revolved around involving the fire that was fixed.

..that&#039;s all I got.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/09/saw-vi-teaser-trailer-online-2/#comment-222022">AB</a>.</p>
<p>I think five was a pure &#8216;filler&#8217; for the SAW franchise. I agree that 5 was definitely a &#8220;wtf&#8221; movie, with the choosing of the random group of people&#8230;and it MIGHT explain their real purpose of being in the movie (there&#8217;s a screenshot of Jill pinning up pictures of the victims, along with their tapes, on a wall).</p>
<p>But I guess they&#8217;re there because of the scandal they all revolved around involving the fire that was fixed.</p>
<p>..that&#8217;s all I got.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ty		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/09/saw-vi-teaser-trailer-online-2/#comment-222055</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ty]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 15:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=21733#comment-222055</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m a HUGE fan of the series, and I always defended it from the hordes of pessimists whom had, to me, made it their mission to convince me how low the SAW franchise has gone in recent years.

Now, I still love SAW, and will probably continue to watch the series until it ends...but I can&#039;t help but be bummed out and disappointed that Lionsgate would want at least two (maybe three) more sequels of a series that was planned to finally end at 7. I know it&#039;s like &quot;oh, well they shouldve ended it at like...the first one&quot;, but if you paid attention to interviews and such, they were already planning on making seven SAWs, for whatever reason....now nine?!?!?? That&#039;s where they lost me.

However, the SAW train is inevitable, so at this point there&#039;s nothing we can do but sit through the next three years of everybody in the film dying, maybe even the antagonist, but somehow finding a way to ressurect the bad guy. Cheers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a HUGE fan of the series, and I always defended it from the hordes of pessimists whom had, to me, made it their mission to convince me how low the SAW franchise has gone in recent years.</p>
<p>Now, I still love SAW, and will probably continue to watch the series until it ends&#8230;but I can&#8217;t help but be bummed out and disappointed that Lionsgate would want at least two (maybe three) more sequels of a series that was planned to finally end at 7. I know it&#8217;s like &#8220;oh, well they shouldve ended it at like&#8230;the first one&#8221;, but if you paid attention to interviews and such, they were already planning on making seven SAWs, for whatever reason&#8230;.now nine?!?!?? That&#8217;s where they lost me.</p>
<p>However, the SAW train is inevitable, so at this point there&#8217;s nothing we can do but sit through the next three years of everybody in the film dying, maybe even the antagonist, but somehow finding a way to ressurect the bad guy. Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Hector Garza		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/09/saw-vi-teaser-trailer-online-2/#comment-222049</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hector Garza]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 14:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=21733#comment-222049</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Agreed.
The first one was really good, original and inventive.
Number two was ok. All after that are boring.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.<br />
The first one was really good, original and inventive.<br />
Number two was ok. All after that are boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
