Comments on: Norton Says No Cameo In Iron Man 2

By: sean

sean — Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:09:50 +0000

i really wish this were true. im more concerned with the possibility that we may not see hulk in any other marvel films. that would just be a bad decision!

By: Billy Hunt

Billy Hunt — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 21:30:44 +0000

I wish it were true, but I wish the Hulk would make a cameo in every movie.

Imagine Milk with a Hulk cameo.

Or if The Time Traveler’s Wife’s Husband was The Hulk.

The Hulk could make any movie amazingly better, well, except for Gummo, nothing would help that train wreck.

By: Ty

Ty — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 19:04:37 +0000

In reply to krazie835. He said the cameo was after the credits in IRON MAN not The Incredible Hulk.

By: krazie835

krazie835 — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:09:29 +0000

Just a little correction, the cameo happened at the end of The Incredible Hulk, not after the credits rolled.

By: SlashBeast

SlashBeast — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:06:27 +0000

The cameos are usually just thrown in there and seem out of place anyway. It was completely random in The Incredible Hulk and it only worked in Iron Man because it was after the credits.

I don’t know if Norton is on the best of terms with Marvel, but I hope any Hulk film in the future doesn’t waste him like the last film did.

By: Andy

Andy — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:46:06 +0000

It doesn’t bother me if he doesn’t make a cameo. We know the plans are for various crossovers and just by slapping in a short cameo towards the end of a movie will start to become too predictable. If they want to keep teasing us or establishing various crossovers they will need to expand on how they do it rather than just doing the same thing.

By: Darren J Seeley

Darren J Seeley — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:26:35 +0000

Any one of the characters from Incredible Hulk could get a snapshot and/or a mention (such as General Ross/Will Hurt), I’ll give Iron Man II that.

There also *could be* a brief cameo by the Hulk, (sans Norton)…

But that’s as far as I’d go.

By: RaX

RaX — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:19:42 +0000

They may not have him in it but maybe the hulk itself…. so maybe hes not lying.

To build up anticipation of the avengers there gonna have to start spinning the cross-overs and cameos + it makes the film that extra bit more interesting !

I will definatly be sitting there alone in the pictures once everyones left just too see the ending.

By: Dragonslayer

Dragonslayer — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:32:15 +0000

THROW MONEY AT HIM UNTIL HE DOES IT!

By: Andrew

Andrew — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:28:26 +0000

It doesn’t really bother me. Unless the cameo is essential to the plot, they never really add much to the story. So I can live without this one.

By: Ricci

Ricci — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:49:05 +0000

I’d rather he didn’t, maybe they could reference to him, like a call for stark setting up a meeting, but somthing sutle.

we know there crossing over, so cameo’s don’t really add anything, it should either be a full scene or just references.

By: War-Journalist

War-Journalist — Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:52:08 +0000

I hadn’t heard any real solid news that Norton had made up with Marvel in the first place. But providing that I missed something, I wish it were true. Maybe not a ‘climactic’ ending cameo (repetitive much), but maybe just a half nod or something.
But hey, Ty brought up the point. Maybe he IS lying.