<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Review: Jack the Giant Slayer	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.themovieblog.com/2013/03/review-jack-the-giant-slayer/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2013/03/review-jack-the-giant-slayer/</link>
	<description>The Correct Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 17:47:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: JamesM		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2013/03/review-jack-the-giant-slayer/#comment-318793</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JamesM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 17:47:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=745179#comment-318793</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good review - spot on.
I got exactly what I was expecting - a decent film, entertaining enough, but not an Avengers or Lord of the Rings. Funny thing about the budget - I kept noticing the armor - very cheap looking. Definitely not where the budget went!
Not a &quot;family&quot;movie for sure. Not a great flick - but not a waste of time either.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good review &#8211; spot on.<br />
I got exactly what I was expecting &#8211; a decent film, entertaining enough, but not an Avengers or Lord of the Rings. Funny thing about the budget &#8211; I kept noticing the armor &#8211; very cheap looking. Definitely not where the budget went!<br />
Not a &#8220;family&#8221;movie for sure. Not a great flick &#8211; but not a waste of time either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
