Comments on: Blade Runner Back On Rep-Detect Duty https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/03/blade-runner-back-on-repdetect-duty/ The Correct Opinion Sat, 05 Mar 2011 01:26:19 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: 420BAND https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/03/blade-runner-back-on-repdetect-duty/#comment-276962 Sat, 05 Mar 2011 01:26:19 +0000 http://themovieblog.com/?p=37946#comment-276962 In reply to 420BAND.

strange bird among sci-fi films released in that era.

]]> By: 420BAND https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/03/blade-runner-back-on-repdetect-duty/#comment-276961 Sat, 05 Mar 2011 01:25:27 +0000 http://themovieblog.com/?p=37946#comment-276961 Dont know what to think on this one.
One one hand I’d want this story/universe untouched by new outsiders (decades later).
On the other hand we can take Tron as an example(to some degree) and recieve it with skeptical open arms.

Blade Runner was always a strange bird among Sci-Fi.

IDK

]]> By: Terry Letourneau https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/03/blade-runner-back-on-repdetect-duty/#comment-276814 Thu, 03 Mar 2011 22:32:38 +0000 http://themovieblog.com/?p=37946#comment-276814 It would be great to go back to the world of Blade Runner, bur it will probably be 2019 by the time we see it lol. Like Pman-67 said, have it focus on another Blade Runner.

]]> By: Pman-67 https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/03/blade-runner-back-on-repdetect-duty/#comment-276764 Thu, 03 Mar 2011 17:45:10 +0000 http://themovieblog.com/?p=37946#comment-276764 I’m all for revisting the Blade Runner world, but I hope they leave Deckard alone. We don’t need an prequel for for Deckard and a sequel could possibly ruin the “was he or wasn’t he’ question/debate. I don’t think that question should be answered. Leave Deckard alone a focus on another Blade Runner.

]]> By: Mattman https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/03/blade-runner-back-on-repdetect-duty/#comment-276735 Thu, 03 Mar 2011 15:26:53 +0000 http://themovieblog.com/?p=37946#comment-276735 Wow. Scary stuff. I’m all for extending a franchise, if done well, but the downside potential here if done poorly is huge.

]]>