<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Hugh Jackman Piles on Pounds for The Wolverine	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/</link>
	<description>The Correct Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 04:24:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: clambake		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/#comment-274201</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[clambake]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Feb 2011 04:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=36798#comment-274201</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I really don&#039;t think Jackman needs to bulk up any more for this movie.  He looked just fine in the other X-Men films and so what if he does look like Clint Eastwood.  He&#039;s a star and has a fan base that will see the film and enjoy it even if he doesn&#039;t look exactly like the comic book character.  In fact, I think a lot of his fans will not like the super beefed up look and will be longing for his more lean, muscled look as in previous films.  It is not healthy for these actors to yo-you with their weight, it can cause permanent health problems for them in the future.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t think Jackman needs to bulk up any more for this movie.  He looked just fine in the other X-Men films and so what if he does look like Clint Eastwood.  He&#8217;s a star and has a fan base that will see the film and enjoy it even if he doesn&#8217;t look exactly like the comic book character.  In fact, I think a lot of his fans will not like the super beefed up look and will be longing for his more lean, muscled look as in previous films.  It is not healthy for these actors to yo-you with their weight, it can cause permanent health problems for them in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: B A T M A N		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/#comment-273858</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[B A T M A N]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 18:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=36798#comment-273858</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s when you know an actor is truly dedicated to his craft.  Just like Christian Bale in The Machinist and Fighter.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s when you know an actor is truly dedicated to his craft.  Just like Christian Bale in The Machinist and Fighter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DAVE		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/#comment-273853</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DAVE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 17:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=36798#comment-273853</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/#comment-273731&quot;&gt;knossis&lt;/a&gt;.

I tend to agree (though I don’t know why we’re talking about Superman in this post).  The not-always-stellar-but-still-pretty-awesome television show Lois and Clark definitely characterized Clark/Superman in this way.  Clark was the primary character and Superman was his alter ego.  Now was Dean Cain the best actor to pull on the tights?  No.  But I found the portrayal of character in this series to be the most relatable and downright likable version of the Man of Steel to date.
Also, I’ve always liked the concept that Lois Lane was in love with Superman from the get-go, but Clark wanted her to love the mortal version of him.

Oh yeah, and I should probably comment on the actual post…uh, yeah, stocky Wolverine would be cool.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/#comment-273731">knossis</a>.</p>
<p>I tend to agree (though I don’t know why we’re talking about Superman in this post).  The not-always-stellar-but-still-pretty-awesome television show Lois and Clark definitely characterized Clark/Superman in this way.  Clark was the primary character and Superman was his alter ego.  Now was Dean Cain the best actor to pull on the tights?  No.  But I found the portrayal of character in this series to be the most relatable and downright likable version of the Man of Steel to date.<br />
Also, I’ve always liked the concept that Lois Lane was in love with Superman from the get-go, but Clark wanted her to love the mortal version of him.</p>
<p>Oh yeah, and I should probably comment on the actual post…uh, yeah, stocky Wolverine would be cool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: knossis		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/#comment-273832</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[knossis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 15:50:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=36798#comment-273832</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/#comment-273807&quot;&gt;TheSwede&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m not sure but I think it has something to do with his time spent in Japan learing the ways of the Samurai. The Hand might be in it as well. Rodney would know for sure though. I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a direct sequel to Origins. They may jump forward in time, change the style and tone of the new film so that we&#039;ll all, in time, forget Origins as screen cannon.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/#comment-273807">TheSwede</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not sure but I think it has something to do with his time spent in Japan learing the ways of the Samurai. The Hand might be in it as well. Rodney would know for sure though. I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a direct sequel to Origins. They may jump forward in time, change the style and tone of the new film so that we&#8217;ll all, in time, forget Origins as screen cannon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anti-Septic		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/#comment-273824</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anti-Septic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 15:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=36798#comment-273824</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/#comment-273769&quot;&gt;Rodney&lt;/a&gt;.

I was ok with Jackman as is also, dont see the need to pack on the pounds after so many films.  He has already established the character, just need a better script this time I think.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/#comment-273769">Rodney</a>.</p>
<p>I was ok with Jackman as is also, dont see the need to pack on the pounds after so many films.  He has already established the character, just need a better script this time I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: TheSwede		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/#comment-273807</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TheSwede]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 15:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=36798#comment-273807</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Quick question: Do we have any idea what the story is? Is it a direct followup on origin or has Aronofsky a new idea in mind? 

I agree with Jackman being the obvious choice to go with here, After reading all the above posts I realized that the only good thing in Origins is Jackman and I hope that&#039;s the only thing they take with them in the next one (Liev was good but I don&#039;t think they need Sabretooth again)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quick question: Do we have any idea what the story is? Is it a direct followup on origin or has Aronofsky a new idea in mind? </p>
<p>I agree with Jackman being the obvious choice to go with here, After reading all the above posts I realized that the only good thing in Origins is Jackman and I hope that&#8217;s the only thing they take with them in the next one (Liev was good but I don&#8217;t think they need Sabretooth again)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Knossis		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/#comment-273791</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Knossis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 11:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=36798#comment-273791</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/#comment-273769&quot;&gt;Rodney&lt;/a&gt;.

I agree. Jackman&#039;s height became a none issue because he got the essence of the character right. Are we going to switch to a shorter actor just so someone can call him runt in the next movie? Things are fine with Jackman as wolverine.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/#comment-273769">Rodney</a>.</p>
<p>I agree. Jackman&#8217;s height became a none issue because he got the essence of the character right. Are we going to switch to a shorter actor just so someone can call him runt in the next movie? Things are fine with Jackman as wolverine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Darren		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/#comment-273776</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 05:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=36798#comment-273776</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/#comment-273746&quot;&gt;420BAND&lt;/a&gt;.

Ah-hah!! Now I know what folks hated so much about The Last Stand! There was NO Dr. Pepper in it!!! Hahaha!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/#comment-273746">420BAND</a>.</p>
<p>Ah-hah!! Now I know what folks hated so much about The Last Stand! There was NO Dr. Pepper in it!!! Hahaha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ian Fay		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/#comment-273772</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ian Fay]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 03:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=36798#comment-273772</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/#comment-273746&quot;&gt;420BAND&lt;/a&gt;.

Haha I understand Rodney, its natural advertisment and all, but it was a bottle he was drinking, so it doesn&#039;t matter how you hold it, yano? I just remember him shuffling it blatantly to show the logo, just felt unatural and breaks my concentration every time.

Also, gotta get me some of that delicious Budweiser. No idea why its stuck in my head like....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/#comment-273746">420BAND</a>.</p>
<p>Haha I understand Rodney, its natural advertisment and all, but it was a bottle he was drinking, so it doesn&#8217;t matter how you hold it, yano? I just remember him shuffling it blatantly to show the logo, just felt unatural and breaks my concentration every time.</p>
<p>Also, gotta get me some of that delicious Budweiser. No idea why its stuck in my head like&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rodney		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/#comment-273769</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 03:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=36798#comment-273769</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/#comment-273744&quot;&gt;Mister Mortamobachman&lt;/a&gt;.

Wolverine&#039;s height in the comics vs Jackman&#039;s height never took away from the character - in fact that he does the character so well that his height doesn&#039;t matter at all. 

And after 4 films of Jackman playing Wolverine, I dont want to see them switch just because he is too tall.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/#comment-273744">Mister Mortamobachman</a>.</p>
<p>Wolverine&#8217;s height in the comics vs Jackman&#8217;s height never took away from the character &#8211; in fact that he does the character so well that his height doesn&#8217;t matter at all. </p>
<p>And after 4 films of Jackman playing Wolverine, I dont want to see them switch just because he is too tall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rodney		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/#comment-273768</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 03:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=36798#comment-273768</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/#comment-273746&quot;&gt;420BAND&lt;/a&gt;.

Side note about product placement.  Can labels are designed so that the drinking hole is aiming towards the &quot;back&quot; label of the can.  You have to rotate the can so that you can drink from it.

That product placement is not only for the film, but its planned marketing that anyone in a movie, bar or backyard picnic will be sporting the can with the brand name logo out. 

Just sayin.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/#comment-273746">420BAND</a>.</p>
<p>Side note about product placement.  Can labels are designed so that the drinking hole is aiming towards the &#8220;back&#8221; label of the can.  You have to rotate the can so that you can drink from it.</p>
<p>That product placement is not only for the film, but its planned marketing that anyone in a movie, bar or backyard picnic will be sporting the can with the brand name logo out. </p>
<p>Just sayin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: 420BAND		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/#comment-273749</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[420BAND]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Feb 2011 00:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=36798#comment-273749</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/#comment-273746&quot;&gt;420BAND&lt;/a&gt;.

Yeah, Leiv was the only quality performance next to Hugh&#039;s in that silly little ditty, Dont get me started on the HACK job they did on Deadpool/weapon xyz or whatever that fiasco was. and Ryan Reynolds is TOO partially responsible IMO.
But what were they thinking with Will I AM (not an actor).
shit lost all kinds of cred with that move. Would love to see Gambit come back though-and the actor did a good job IMO]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.themovieblog.com/2011/02/hugh-jackman-piles-on-pounds-for-the-wolverine/#comment-273746">420BAND</a>.</p>
<p>Yeah, Leiv was the only quality performance next to Hugh&#8217;s in that silly little ditty, Dont get me started on the HACK job they did on Deadpool/weapon xyz or whatever that fiasco was. and Ryan Reynolds is TOO partially responsible IMO.<br />
But what were they thinking with Will I AM (not an actor).<br />
shit lost all kinds of cred with that move. Would love to see Gambit come back though-and the actor did a good job IMO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
