Comments on: New Bond in 2012

By: Ryan Squiggly

Ryan Squiggly — Thu, 18 Nov 2010 01:58:27 +0000

I don’t think that Daniel Craig did a good job in either movie. To me bond just isn’t the same since Brosnan. The character of James Bond has always been a tough, and strong yet sophisticated and smart. The latter qualities have not been displayed in Craig’s performances. I think that it is time for a new bond, one the likes of Sean Connery and Pierce Brosnan. Bring back the gadgets, cars and women that made this series great.

By: Hills

Hills — Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:05:58 +0000

I think a new Bond film with Daniel Craig would be just the ticket if it happens. Who else springs to mind for the next Bond? There was even talk of Robbie Williams at one point but more of a joke I’m sure..

By: Paul

Paul — Mon, 08 Nov 2010 13:09:46 +0000

Thank goodness I love the bond films, Daniel craig needs to be bond to finish off the trilogy, the last 2 are leading up to the next film which, should show the criminal organization to be S.P.E.C.T.A. Yes they are back, I cant wait..

By: darren j seeley

darren j seeley — Sun, 07 Nov 2010 23:48:30 +0000

Big surprise.

We knew they would focus on the two franchiss in which the masses are most interested in. Hobbit, of course, is a shared production. The announcement of 2012 isn’t too far off base either- assuming the script and director remain intact from the development stages almost a year ago.

While Quantum was a slight disappointment, it wasn’t horrible by any means. Not to mention if you play it back to back with Royale, it doesn’t so bad.

The only real questions at this time are:

*The releases of Red Dawn and Cabin In The Woods.

*What films they could pick up for limited distrubution.

By: Rodney

Rodney — Sun, 07 Nov 2010 21:32:51 +0000

In reply to fullmetal_medji. Spent more money than they made. Couldn't pay the bills. My guess.

By: fullmetal_medji

fullmetal_medji — Sun, 07 Nov 2010 21:22:30 +0000

Can anyone tell me how MGM got into some much debt?

By: Dirk Anger

Dirk Anger — Sat, 06 Nov 2010 15:48:07 +0000

At this point I just don’t want to even consider anybody else besides Daniel Craig for the role. The dude just owns it. Quantum of Solace wasn’t great but it sure as hell wasn’t his fault. The guy’s a beast in the tux.

By: Scott

Scott — Sat, 06 Nov 2010 12:36:35 +0000

For a second I feared “re-cast” when I read the 2012 thing, thinking Daniel Craig may not be up to it then realised its not that far away. Just hope they get back to the standard they set with Royale as Solace was just an add-on of Casino Royale.

Just wonder if they will go for a re-working of any old Bonds or go for a completely new story, which is great but as we seen with Solace they just never captured the feel of Bond that well. Is there any Fleming stuff not yet touched on for Bond or have they exhausted that root?

By: obi-wan Kubrick

obi-wan Kubrick — Sat, 06 Nov 2010 03:59:31 +0000

Craig has a contact for 3 movies with an option for a fourth. So how could they lose Craig? I thought Casino Royale was amazing and maybe the best bond film dare I say. At east in the top 5. But Quantum of Solace was a huge disappointment, it had great action but a lame plot and i think the whole story was told poorly. Why do they bother getting artsy directors for bond films?

By: Shane

Shane — Sat, 06 Nov 2010 01:19:50 +0000

Hey Rodney, what did you think of the last Bond film?

By: Shane

Shane — Sat, 06 Nov 2010 01:19:07 +0000

They better keep Craig. Easily one of the best (if not the best) Bond.

By: joe c

joe c — Fri, 05 Nov 2010 21:27:15 +0000

me to i really like him as bond