Comments on: First Look at Radcliffe in The Woman in Black

By: tee

tee — Tue, 23 Nov 2010 17:29:35 +0000

a good stage show so hopefully it translate well on the bug screen
ww1 film is called ‘My boy Jack’

By: vargas

vargas — Sun, 14 Nov 2010 06:23:33 +0000

From what I’ve heard he did well in the play Equus a few years back.

By: Ty

Ty — Thu, 11 Nov 2010 17:58:59 +0000

I’m excited to see this. I think he’ll be able to shed the typecast pretty easily.

By: Mee

Mee — Thu, 11 Nov 2010 15:26:56 +0000

I like spooky movies of atmosphere and quality. Some of these include The Innocents (Deborah Kerr), The Haunting (1963?), and The Changeling (w/George C. Scott). These kinds of movies are hard to find these days. A few years ago, I picked up (it was either BBC or Granada Television) The Woman in Black. I really wanted to enjoy it, but I did not. I think it might have had to do with the limited budget, as the book is a good read. I hope the new version, given its star-power, will be much better. BTW, Radcliffe did a WW1 drama that was quite good. I think he played the son of Rudyard Kipling or some other author.

By: Art

Art — Thu, 11 Nov 2010 07:59:44 +0000

I think Harry can easily shed the Harry Potter typecast. As can Emma Watson. Rupert Grint, however, I have seen him in other movies and all I see is Ron Weasley. I think he’ll have a harder time being seen as anything other than Ron.

By: 420BAND

420BAND — Wed, 10 Nov 2010 20:46:48 +0000

Keep the flying broom locked in the closet, and you’ll do fine kid.

By: Bryan

Bryan — Wed, 10 Nov 2010 18:32:42 +0000

To separate himself visually from Harry Potter, all he really needs to do is remove the glasses and the scar. That’s the iconic image. Hopefully he can avoid typecasting. He’s a fine actor and deserves the opportunity to show it.