<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Top Gun 2 will be about Maverick	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.themovieblog.com/2010/10/top-gun-2-will-be-about-maverick/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2010/10/top-gun-2-will-be-about-maverick/</link>
	<description>The Correct Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 00:27:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: knossis		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2010/10/top-gun-2-will-be-about-maverick/#comment-264748</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[knossis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 00:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=34062#comment-264748</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t think it would be feasible to have a Top Gun 2 without Maverick or Cruise in the leading Role. No one wants to see a seguel to Top Gun with a bunch of people we don&#039;t give a crap about starring in it. You might as well call it Iron Eagle or something. So hat&#039;s off to the decision makers on this one, good job.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t think it would be feasible to have a Top Gun 2 without Maverick or Cruise in the leading Role. No one wants to see a seguel to Top Gun with a bunch of people we don&#8217;t give a crap about starring in it. You might as well call it Iron Eagle or something. So hat&#8217;s off to the decision makers on this one, good job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2010/10/top-gun-2-will-be-about-maverick/#comment-264694</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 01:00:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=34062#comment-264694</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.themovieblog.com/2010/10/top-gun-2-will-be-about-maverick/#comment-264608&quot;&gt;Martin&lt;/a&gt;.

wow]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.themovieblog.com/2010/10/top-gun-2-will-be-about-maverick/#comment-264608">Martin</a>.</p>
<p>wow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Wormboy		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2010/10/top-gun-2-will-be-about-maverick/#comment-264682</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wormboy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 21:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=34062#comment-264682</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.themovieblog.com/2010/10/top-gun-2-will-be-about-maverick/#comment-264654&quot;&gt;420BAND&lt;/a&gt;.

I&#039;m pretty sure John McCain and Sarah Palin have ruined the word &#039;maverick&#039; for everyone. Its not a political thing, its just that the word got thrown around so many times since 2008 that its lost all meaning. I get a little queasy just typing it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.themovieblog.com/2010/10/top-gun-2-will-be-about-maverick/#comment-264654">420BAND</a>.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m pretty sure John McCain and Sarah Palin have ruined the word &#8216;maverick&#8217; for everyone. Its not a political thing, its just that the word got thrown around so many times since 2008 that its lost all meaning. I get a little queasy just typing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: 420BAND		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2010/10/top-gun-2-will-be-about-maverick/#comment-264654</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[420BAND]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 17:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=34062#comment-264654</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[does anyone still CARE about Top Gun?
just askin&#039;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>does anyone still CARE about Top Gun?<br />
just askin&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Martin		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2010/10/top-gun-2-will-be-about-maverick/#comment-264608</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=34062#comment-264608</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Isn&#039;t it obvious:

Maverick is old-skool and he thinks the new recruits are a bunch of punks. They have a bunch of confrontations, and Maverick tries to prove that a pilot needs to be &#039;in the plane&#039; to &#039;understand the plane&#039;.

But the Bureaucrats have their way and the remote planes offer a cheaper and a less risky alternative to manned combat missions, and Maverick is forced to submit to flying remote planes.

Then there&#039;s an accident, one of the remote planes strikes an innocent civilian target. Its an accident that could have been avoided by a cockpit pilot.

Maverick freaks out. He storms out of his supervisor&#039;s office, jumps into his personal plane and flies off to blow off some steam.

Then a bogey interceptor encounters Maverick. Maverick is shot down behind enemy lines.

All the punk recruits gang together and go on a rescue mission.

The Punks learn the value of being in the real combat situation and discover how hard it is to take another person&#039;s life when its not on a computer screen. Maverick learns to be more cool-headed, and that the new recruits are good people too.

Ten quid that&#039;s the movie, in a nutshell.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it obvious:</p>
<p>Maverick is old-skool and he thinks the new recruits are a bunch of punks. They have a bunch of confrontations, and Maverick tries to prove that a pilot needs to be &#8216;in the plane&#8217; to &#8216;understand the plane&#8217;.</p>
<p>But the Bureaucrats have their way and the remote planes offer a cheaper and a less risky alternative to manned combat missions, and Maverick is forced to submit to flying remote planes.</p>
<p>Then there&#8217;s an accident, one of the remote planes strikes an innocent civilian target. Its an accident that could have been avoided by a cockpit pilot.</p>
<p>Maverick freaks out. He storms out of his supervisor&#8217;s office, jumps into his personal plane and flies off to blow off some steam.</p>
<p>Then a bogey interceptor encounters Maverick. Maverick is shot down behind enemy lines.</p>
<p>All the punk recruits gang together and go on a rescue mission.</p>
<p>The Punks learn the value of being in the real combat situation and discover how hard it is to take another person&#8217;s life when its not on a computer screen. Maverick learns to be more cool-headed, and that the new recruits are good people too.</p>
<p>Ten quid that&#8217;s the movie, in a nutshell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
