Comments on: Liam Neeson Replaces Mel Gibson’s Cameo in Hangover 2

By: Rodney

Rodney — Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:57:52 +0000

In reply to J Cribbs. So a an admitted racist and sexist alcoholic is "too good" for the hottest comedy sensation of last year? I am thinking you might be in a minority there.

By: J Cribbs

J Cribbs — Wed, 27 Oct 2010 14:43:17 +0000

Mel Gibson is too good for a generic comedy like The Hangover.

By: Geno

Geno — Wed, 27 Oct 2010 04:23:16 +0000

In reply to Rodney. I think I would be more afraid of Tyson over Mel. Especially recently Tyson has gotten into good shape again.. Try calling him a rapist without getting your face punched in.. So if Iron Mike wants to be a film, please be my guest. I am a fan of Mel Gibson and it sucks that his personal life is geting the best of him. But it should be a reason to oust him especially in a comedy. Maybe his cameo would be funny and possible poking fun at himself? Hey if you can't laugh at yourself right? I wonder what type of cameo Liam would do? Maybe look like Qui Gon? Or act like Aslan with a lion mask or something? Or maybe go to Bradley Coopers character and say "I worked with a guy who looked like you".

By: Chad

Chad — Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:27:26 +0000

Let me see if I’ve got this straight, in a poll I saw not too long ago, a majority said they hoped Tiger Woods managed to recover from his uhh, own scandal, & make a comeback with his Golfing. But Mel gets set up by a broad pushing his buttons & exploiting his issues with substance abuse so we’re just gonna crucify him?! Seriously? I’ve had married friends get into arguments that make what Mel spouted off sound like Mr. Rogers singing ‘Jesus loves me’. The only reason this is as much of a ‘scandal’ as it is is because we’re talking about Mel Gibson. And this calculating ‘broad’ I’m sure did absolutely nothing to incite his outburst & then just conveniently had a recording device handy when ol’ Mel pops his cork? Puh-leeze! Personally, if it comes down to see which recovers first from their own respective scandal, either Tiger or Mel? Put it this way; I could give a rats a$$ less about Tiger.

By: HDpunk

HDpunk — Tue, 26 Oct 2010 00:32:11 +0000

i remember reading somewhere else that tiger woods was going to do “the cameo” for the hangover 2 & to me that sounds like a better idea than mel or Liam Neeson

By: Rodney

Rodney — Mon, 25 Oct 2010 23:16:04 +0000

In reply to Dirk S.. Tyson did his time and suffered his punishment. I see nothing wrong with giving someone a second chance who did his time. Polanski is still a rapist. He never did his time and I would protest being involved with anything he did.

By: Dirk S.

Dirk S. — Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:48:14 +0000

Just because somebody’s made a few entertaining movies in their day, doesn’t excuse them from acts of bigotry; i don’t think it’s unreasonable for Zach or any other actors in the cast from objecting to working with him.

As for the supposed hypocrisy of working with Mike Tyson, and not Mel: Zach et al weren’t really in a position career wise to object to casting decisions before the first movie came out. Now, things have changed, and they feel like exercising their newfound influence. Seems perfectly reasonable to me.

I wouldn’t want to work with an anti-semite hack like Gibson either.

By: MADMAX_007

MADMAX_007 — Mon, 25 Oct 2010 20:38:22 +0000

That’s because it’s okay to rape in Hollywood (Look up Victor Salva and Roman Polanski). But a couple of Jew hatin remarks will get you castrated in that town.

By: Kevin

Kevin — Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:12:02 +0000

Word on the mike Tyson comment that is some hypocritical shit. I mean just cuz Gibson been havin some problems don’t mean anything everybody goes through rough patches. I mean who the hell does Zachary galifinskas think he is a fat bearded guy that’s been kinda funny in like three movies. Meanwhile Mel Gibson is a goddamn legend in Hollywood regardless of personal problems going on right now. I mean that’s riggs,mad max, braveheart etc. So when Zach becomes a Hollywood legend(which he won’t) than he can talk shit or complain till than keep you mouth shut.

By: 420BAND

420BAND — Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:27:58 +0000

In reply to 420BAND. And this stuff sounds like jibber jabber between 2 of them (a-holes)

By: 420BAND

420BAND — Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:20:33 +0000

In reply to DirkPower.

One of the main draws, yeah BUT who decides if a 5 minute cameo by Mel (not gonna defend the guy)gets o.k.’d or not. the director, producer, or the Flash in the Pan token “Fat Guy” who’s taken up all the slack that Cris Farley left behind and Kevin James cant live up to. Grant it, his comedy is different and deadpan and seems fresh in todays comedy climate and I dont dislike the guy. But in a sequel to last years most overrated comedy the last thing that needs to be heard are quarrells on-set by Zack not “approving” of a pretty much meaningless cameo in a comedy.(if it’s true that this alledgedly happened) Thats all. nothin’ more nothin’ less dude.

Opinions are like assholes : everyone’s got one : everybody knows one

By: DirkPower

DirkPower — Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:59:25 +0000

He thinks he’s a film star (he is) and that he’s one of the main draws of the film. I think his opinions are a little more valid then yours. And so many people dislike mel gibson right now, especially after those vile phonecalls, its too fresh in peoples minds.