<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: First Look at Megan Fox as an Angel in Passion Play	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.themovieblog.com/2010/09/first-look-at-megan-fox-as-an-angel-in-passion-play/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2010/09/first-look-at-megan-fox-as-an-angel-in-passion-play/</link>
	<description>The Correct Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 21:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Rodney		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2010/09/first-look-at-megan-fox-as-an-angel-in-passion-play/#comment-261345</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodney]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 21:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=32595#comment-261345</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.themovieblog.com/2010/09/first-look-at-megan-fox-as-an-angel-in-passion-play/#comment-261343&quot;&gt;Anti-Septic&lt;/a&gt;.

We didn&#039;t hear about Murrays social clashes with Lui until after the film was out.  Furthermore, Murray was already of the mind that he wouldn&#039;t do sequels long before Angels.

Fox is fine if all she needs to be is eyecandy.  Like I said above.  I hope she doesn&#039;t have to talk much.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.themovieblog.com/2010/09/first-look-at-megan-fox-as-an-angel-in-passion-play/#comment-261343">Anti-Septic</a>.</p>
<p>We didn&#8217;t hear about Murrays social clashes with Lui until after the film was out.  Furthermore, Murray was already of the mind that he wouldn&#8217;t do sequels long before Angels.</p>
<p>Fox is fine if all she needs to be is eyecandy.  Like I said above.  I hope she doesn&#8217;t have to talk much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anti-Septic		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2010/09/first-look-at-megan-fox-as-an-angel-in-passion-play/#comment-261343</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anti-Septic]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 21:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=32595#comment-261343</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well Megan Fox cant be as bad as Lucy Lui cause he wont act with anyone who is annoying and talentless.  That is why Bill Murray wasnt in the Charlie&#039;s Angels sequel cause he called Lucy a talentless hack or something along those lines. lol

There was a huge fight on set between them and etc.  At least that is what I read, so far Bill Murray hasnt said a word about Megan.  I&#039;ll see this as a home rental, I save my theater money for the big ticket movies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Megan Fox cant be as bad as Lucy Lui cause he wont act with anyone who is annoying and talentless.  That is why Bill Murray wasnt in the Charlie&#8217;s Angels sequel cause he called Lucy a talentless hack or something along those lines. lol</p>
<p>There was a huge fight on set between them and etc.  At least that is what I read, so far Bill Murray hasnt said a word about Megan.  I&#8217;ll see this as a home rental, I save my theater money for the big ticket movies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Roman		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2010/09/first-look-at-megan-fox-as-an-angel-in-passion-play/#comment-261339</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 18:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=32595#comment-261339</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Im strangely interested in this. That scene was so awkward i believed it and that is what sells me.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im strangely interested in this. That scene was so awkward i believed it and that is what sells me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: 420BAND		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2010/09/first-look-at-megan-fox-as-an-angel-in-passion-play/#comment-261251</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[420BAND]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 23:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=32595#comment-261251</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.themovieblog.com/2010/09/first-look-at-megan-fox-as-an-angel-in-passion-play/#comment-261248&quot;&gt;Bigsampson&lt;/a&gt;.

CANDY?......................OH! it rymes with Hunt Right?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.themovieblog.com/2010/09/first-look-at-megan-fox-as-an-angel-in-passion-play/#comment-261248">Bigsampson</a>.</p>
<p>CANDY?&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.OH! it rymes with Hunt Right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bigsampson		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2010/09/first-look-at-megan-fox-as-an-angel-in-passion-play/#comment-261248</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bigsampson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 21:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=32595#comment-261248</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[hmmm IDK just looking at her makes me think of the C word.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm IDK just looking at her makes me think of the C word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
