<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Second Dinner for Schmucks Trailer Online	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.themovieblog.com/2010/06/second-dinner-for-schmucks-trailer-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2010/06/second-dinner-for-schmucks-trailer-online/</link>
	<description>The Correct Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 22:47:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: 420BAND		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2010/06/second-dinner-for-schmucks-trailer-online/#comment-252931</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[420BAND]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 22:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=28083#comment-252931</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oh how I miss 40 yr old virgin.

that was good, this looks blah.

but, trailers could be decieving from time to time and could go either way.

well see. 

Carell is wearing thin on me, Rudd is always fun though]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh how I miss 40 yr old virgin.</p>
<p>that was good, this looks blah.</p>
<p>but, trailers could be decieving from time to time and could go either way.</p>
<p>well see. </p>
<p>Carell is wearing thin on me, Rudd is always fun though</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: cloud720		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2010/06/second-dinner-for-schmucks-trailer-online/#comment-252870</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cloud720]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=28083#comment-252870</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I didn&#039;t laugh much at either.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t laugh much at either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Andrew James		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2010/06/second-dinner-for-schmucks-trailer-online/#comment-252861</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 15:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=28083#comment-252861</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ok, just watched this trailer.  Looks retarded.  a couple laughs, but mostly bullshit.

But there was some Bruce Greenwood in there! - might be enough to get me to head out and see this.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, just watched this trailer.  Looks retarded.  a couple laughs, but mostly bullshit.</p>
<p>But there was some Bruce Greenwood in there! &#8211; might be enough to get me to head out and see this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Andrew James		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2010/06/second-dinner-for-schmucks-trailer-online/#comment-252854</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 15:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=28083#comment-252854</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;ll be interesting to see what they do with these.  The cast alone should carry the film.  I remember thinking the original was a good idea, but if memory serves (its been years since I&#039;ve seen it) I thought the humor was a little too dry and didn&#039;t work all that well.

If the humor here stays relatively deadpan and dry, but with these actors, I think it will be fun.  If it gets all ridiculous and off the rails (in an &quot;Anchorman&quot; sort of way), it&#039;ll probably be pretty unfunny, obvious and ultimately forgettable.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;ll be interesting to see what they do with these.  The cast alone should carry the film.  I remember thinking the original was a good idea, but if memory serves (its been years since I&#8217;ve seen it) I thought the humor was a little too dry and didn&#8217;t work all that well.</p>
<p>If the humor here stays relatively deadpan and dry, but with these actors, I think it will be fun.  If it gets all ridiculous and off the rails (in an &#8220;Anchorman&#8221; sort of way), it&#8217;ll probably be pretty unfunny, obvious and ultimately forgettable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
