Comments on: Pandorum Review

By: Man of Sin

Man of Sin — Sun, 14 Feb 2016 10:44:00 +0000

They weren’t the crew, but their descendants. This was shown in the film and stated by the filmmakers.

This pretty much got a low rating for no reason.

By: Man_of_Sin

Man_of_Sin — Fri, 10 Oct 2014 12:31:00 +0000

You misunderstood the basic plot and overlooked details of the film, John.

They were not transformed passengers but their evolved descedants as nearly thousands of years went by. The filmmakers even mention this on the DVD. What happened was that their ancestors went insane with Pandorum and their unstable minds were manipulated by Gallo to play cannibalistic games. The creatures were continuing said game as part of a generations long tradition.

Read all about it here.
http://commentaryandcritiquing.blogspot.com/2013/07/pandorum-loveletter-to-hp-lovecraft.html

By: Johnny Failed

Johnny Failed — Thu, 06 Mar 2014 00:45:39 +0000

The film makers also said they were descendants of the crew on the DVD/Blue-ray, not the crew itself. Pretentious and shallow review.

By: Johnny Failed

Johnny Failed — Thu, 06 Mar 2014 00:44:53 +0000

The film makers also said their were descendants of the crew, not the crew itself. Pretentious and shallow review.

By: Grammar Nazi

Grammar Nazi — Wed, 05 Feb 2014 20:25:47 +0000

The poster below has a point, but his grammar is bad.

By: Seriously John

Seriously John — Sat, 01 Feb 2014 16:47:16 +0000

Someone recently mentioned this review on IMBD. Why would you think they former crew members? They had to over 900 years old for that to be true. The film didn’t fail as mystery, you failed at putting any critical thought when watching this movie!

By: Khalil

Khalil — Sun, 03 Nov 2013 00:50:19 +0000

Here is the link.

h t t p ://anarchyreviews.blogspot. com/2013/07/pandorum-loveletter-to-hp-lovecraft. html

By: Khalil

Khalil — Sun, 03 Nov 2013 00:47:07 +0000

In reply to Deborah Kelley Moore. Here is the deep meaning this guy didn't notice. h t t p ://anarchyreviews.blogspot. com/2013/07/pandorum-loveletter-to-hp-lovecraft. html

By: Khalil

Khalil — Sun, 03 Nov 2013 00:45:56 +0000

Reposted due to grammar: I know this is an old review but John clearly does not know what kung fu is. Also here is a rebuttal for this review which I found to be eye rolling. Former crew? That would make make thing over 900 years old. You clearly missed the entire point of the film.

http://anarchyreviews.blogspot.com/2013/07/pandorum-loveletter-to-hp-lovecraft.html

By: Khalil

Khalil — Sun, 03 Nov 2013 00:44:14 +0000

I know this is an old review but clearly does not kung fu is. Also here is a rebuttal for this review which I found to be eye rolling. Former crew? That would make make thing over 900 years old. You clearly missed the entire point of the film.

By: Mystic

Mystic — Fri, 01 Nov 2013 15:46:08 +0000

They were not former crew members they evolved from them. Talk about lack of insight. Here is a rebuttal.

http://anarchyreviews.blogspot.com/2013/07/pandorum-loveletter-to-hp-lovecraft.html

By: DevilMayhem666

DevilMayhem666 — Sat, 24 Dec 2011 18:50:34 +0000

Yeah, John I think you seriously missed the entire point of the monsters. If they were the passengers than that would mean that they are centuries years old. The twist revealed that they were sleep for 800+ years. They were the descendants of the crew that went crazy and became cannibals. They evolved slower over generations and generations to adapt to which a life style.

The film was exploring aspects of the phase “Survival of The Fittest”which is about evolution, competition, adaption, and cooperation. All of that was in the film.