i agree with you……this doesnt look scary at all i saw the first one pshhhhh you call that a horror film dont think so>>>>but itll be interesting to see how this movie plays out….and the whole new additon with the chairs might be a little better

it’s not like Up looked worse in 3D, but it wasn’t really necessary.

I agree it’s interesting. I’m not sure where I fall on the 3D stuff, sometimes I think it should remain a gimmick and be used only a few times a year. Other times I think there’s potential for them to do something really interesting with it. It might be interesting to see an art film that makes a different type of use of 3D. Cuz I agree, the type of use shown in the G-Force preview seemed unbearably dumb

Tomi
So youre saying you didnt like it because it didnt have stuff flying at your face, the usuall 3D

And im saying that i liked it because it didnt, but i watched it in regular theaters.

Thats interesting.

So now I wonder if a movie could be made that pleases both. Has great action scenes or scary- with stuff coming at your face in 3D AANNDD it doesnt seem obvious when watched in regular theaters.

I heard UP was great on 3D but i dont know myself

I gotta disagree JAMES, I thought there was no reason for UP to be in 3D and it was basically a waste of 4 extra dollars.

I think a good analogous example would be widescreen. When widescreen first game out, that was a gimmick too, but don’t we prefer movies that are “made for” widescreen as opposed to ones that are shown in widescreen but might as well have been shown in a standard aspect ratio? As such, I preferred the MBV 3D experience to the UP 3D experience (though UP was the better movie, of course)

But it’s EXTERNAL to the film itself, like 3D, hence my use of the term “gimmick”.

Darren, what you just explained, THAT- would annoy the fuck out of me.
Thats the exact same shit i was talking about dude. Im glad you where patient enough to keep yourself from throwing your head at the screen, but my patience isnt that immune to retardedly made movies. (See that word I made up?) I salute your patience and coolness.

And yes Jeremy, i saw UP in regular theaters (call me old-fashioned) and not once did I think that it was made for 3D in any scenes. That movie was so great in so many ways…

gimmick is juts a word for something you don’t like. otherwise it’s called a “technique” or a “style” :)

Its not 4D. Just because there is motion seats that vibrate doesnt add a new dimension to the depth of the picture.

Yeah Darren, it’s a pathetic attempt to make the movie different then the last 3.

Its kinda like how Scorcher 6 was on ice instead of lava so that it would be different then the other 6

“Here we go again…..Again”

This news is slightly interesting, but not surprising. When Final 3 hit DVd, they had that ‘alternate’ option where if you “choose a path” the characters could either be spared a death or die differently. In other words, it’s a gimmick. In this case, the gag of going Will Castle has a limited appeal, if not audience reach- as pointed out, this isn’t T2 3D (Universal/MGM theme parks) or Honey I Shrunk The Audience (the Disney one a number of years ago).

The new Destination will be R rated- those theme parks 3D attractions are family friendly. The theme park films are not subject to box office, but rather audience appeal. It is a given that many who attend the theme parks come from out of state. This makes those 3D films, such as T2 3D more fun and entertaining. Final Destination does not have these luxuries.

How much life will Destination have- even if it turns out to be a good horror film? Will we get the shaky seats at home, or do we have to make use out of our late granny’s rocking chair?