yeah but you get so offended when people talk trash about your review when you do the same to other people’s opinons.

1 – That has been the subtitle of the site since its earliest days and if you don’t get the ironic sarcasm, then I don’t know what else to say.

2 – If I am talking crap about a movie they love and they take it personal, I don’t know what to say about that either. I am not going to suddenly love everything just so I don’t offend someone. If I give a review, I am going to give a review. It’s just opinion.

You know, Rodney and John are some cool guys, really. And people should probably stop giving them shit for liking or disliking something you feel differently about. But, there are two things that sound so hypocritical it’s unbearable.
1.) The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions. There are no such thing as “correct” opinions. It’s a contradiction and if you’ve got such a problem with people saying you’re review sucks then that’s their opinion so stop acting like children and just forget about it.
2.) You CONSTANTLY criticize EVERYONE who disagrees. Example “Well, if you think bad acting, horrible action and under story development is your idea of a good movie…” Fuck off man. That’s belittling and you guys are just as bad sometimes. But, I would like to say that to be as honest as possible, these are only words, and with only words comes tone def so you should start making videos of your comments or something so people won’t feel so bad when it sounds like your trying to talk crap about what they feel is a great movie.

5/10

Well I usually don’t let other people’s opinion decided whether I liked a movie or not, but talking about it more made me acknowledge more problems I had w/ the film…I still like the film, and still say its better than T3.

I was discussing this movie with anyone who saw it and though not all agreed with me (some gave it worse) I still stand by my assessment.

Someone else’s feelings on the movie wont change that I like it.

John rants hardcore about Blade Runner, but that doesnt stop me from liking it.

In terms of acting, it seemed that Anton Yelchin was the only consistently good person in the movie. Bale was just as emotionless as the machines, while Worthington was somewhat sporadic, ranging from good to somewhat below par. As for the other characters, the rest of them were just there; there was no development and no reason for them to be there. They were all 2D characters thrown in to make things drag on for the protagonists (and it didn’t do much for them).

I’m not going to dwelve into some of the other problems regarding story, but I will say it was formulaic, lacked any tension whatsoever, and had a very predictable twist near the end regarding humanity’s “means for ending the war.”

Entertaining? Yes. But as a movie that tried to be seriously good, it just failed.

Thanks Darren. Must say they did a pretty good job convincing me that it really was Arnold’s head. (The body obviously was a bit too young.)

Anyway, enough about Connor and the wife. I thought McG created an amazing world in this Terminator, a very raw and gritty setting just the way I like it. Also saw quite a bit of depth in the story, and though many seem to think there was no story, there definitely was. Introducing how John and Kyle meet, the human/Skynet big plan to take each other out, Marcus’s story, all of this was part of the story and then some. It was not a masterpiece, but I liked it just as much as T1 or T2. I think people went in expecting a Saving Private Ryan war movie involving Terminators, which it was not. For a Terminator movie, I loved every second of it.

Really hope it does well enough so that McG can get started right away with the next. Can’t wait where the final script takes the story. If I can’t have any more T:SCC, I hope to at least get another Terminator better sooner than later!