<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: New Image From Jim Carrey&#8217;s &#8220;A Christmas Carol&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/05/new-image-from-jim-carreys-a-christmas-carol/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/05/new-image-from-jim-carreys-a-christmas-carol/</link>
	<description>The Correct Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 19:42:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Schulzy		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/05/new-image-from-jim-carreys-a-christmas-carol/#comment-201299</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schulzy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 19:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=19673#comment-201299</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/05/new-image-from-jim-carreys-a-christmas-carol/#comment-201293&quot;&gt;robertwolf&lt;/a&gt;.

Wow, that&#039;s... just a bit creepy right there.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/05/new-image-from-jim-carreys-a-christmas-carol/#comment-201293">robertwolf</a>.</p>
<p>Wow, that&#8217;s&#8230; just a bit creepy right there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: robertwolf		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/05/new-image-from-jim-carreys-a-christmas-carol/#comment-201293</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[robertwolf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 19:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=19673#comment-201293</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This image of Jim Carrey as Scrooge reminds me of a dying old person at a retirement home. You visit them each day, but they keep on living, which feels like forever. Those eyes of death piercing through your soul as the face of an old man marvels at your youth.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This image of Jim Carrey as Scrooge reminds me of a dying old person at a retirement home. You visit them each day, but they keep on living, which feels like forever. Those eyes of death piercing through your soul as the face of an old man marvels at your youth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: LordThyBob		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/05/new-image-from-jim-carreys-a-christmas-carol/#comment-201248</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LordThyBob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 16:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=19673#comment-201248</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[While I don&#039;t get the point or motion capturing Tom Hanks to make an animated character that looks  just like Tom Hanks, I like this  example and can see this being used a lot more often if it comes out all right.

This was you can get a great actor that may not fit physically to the roles you are shooting (age weight, race, etc.) and get their level of performance without heavy makeup or CG editing (like the de-ageing of Patrick Stewart)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I don&#8217;t get the point or motion capturing Tom Hanks to make an animated character that looks  just like Tom Hanks, I like this  example and can see this being used a lot more often if it comes out all right.</p>
<p>This was you can get a great actor that may not fit physically to the roles you are shooting (age weight, race, etc.) and get their level of performance without heavy makeup or CG editing (like the de-ageing of Patrick Stewart)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: fullmetal_medji		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/05/new-image-from-jim-carreys-a-christmas-carol/#comment-201246</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fullmetal_medji]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 16:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=19673#comment-201246</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wow the faces actually show emotion now.  can&#039;t wait for this.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow the faces actually show emotion now.  can&#8217;t wait for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: T.J.		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2009/05/new-image-from-jim-carreys-a-christmas-carol/#comment-201233</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T.J.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2009 16:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=19673#comment-201233</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[here&#039;s hoping they finally figure out how to get the eyes right. I don&#039;t have much problems with the whole uncanny vally thing. It&#039;s just the eyes that need some work, thought they got a lot better in Beowulf then Polar Express where they were terrible. So cross fingers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here&#8217;s hoping they finally figure out how to get the eyes right. I don&#8217;t have much problems with the whole uncanny vally thing. It&#8217;s just the eyes that need some work, thought they got a lot better in Beowulf then Polar Express where they were terrible. So cross fingers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
