Comments on: Farrell talks more Anchorman 2

By: ProdSon@TheFilmNest

ProdSon@TheFilmNest — Fri, 29 May 2009 17:31:14 +0000

As much as I don’t really care for the movie, I’m positive they can make everything work.

By: HAZMAT

HAZMAT — Wed, 27 May 2009 20:43:29 +0000

The question is…

Will it be on the Moon?

By: 3R!C

3R!C — Wed, 27 May 2009 19:39:02 +0000

I hope they do the sequel. THE MAN PUNTED BAXTER! THE MAN FROM THE MOTORCYCLE ON THE BRIDGE, I HIT HIM WITH A BURRITO!

By: Corey

Corey — Wed, 27 May 2009 17:38:05 +0000

I’m sure he knows you Can act after being diagnosed with breast cancer but she couldve decided to stop after that. I haven’t heard of her being in anything since then. But I thought I’d read before that Paul Rudd has said he wants to do a sequel

By: T-Vo

T-Vo — Wed, 27 May 2009 16:24:58 +0000

By Odins Raven and Great Zeus’s Beard, this is something I have to see!
The Whales Vagina needs it!

By: Johnson

Johnson — Wed, 27 May 2009 16:03:59 +0000

In reply to dave. I'd agree, i think you're taking Ferrells joke a bit too seriously, i'm sure a few months back either Steve Carrel or Paul Rudd made a similar jokey statement about Anchorman 2 whilst being interviewed on Radio 1 in the U.K.

By: Erick

Erick — Wed, 27 May 2009 15:56:18 +0000

In reply to dave. I think he means that you took his not wanting to get a pay cut joke too literal.

By: Erick

Erick — Wed, 27 May 2009 15:55:15 +0000

In reply to Elliott. Nope it's impossible to act after being diagnosed with breast cancer...haha wow, cmon, logic is your best friend.

By: Elliott

Elliott — Wed, 27 May 2009 15:25:52 +0000

Is Applegate still working? Didn’t she have breast cancer? Just wondering if she still acts after that?

By: Rodney

Rodney — Wed, 27 May 2009 13:55:48 +0000

In reply to dave. I don't understand the question.

By: dave

dave — Wed, 27 May 2009 13:51:32 +0000

that is seriously what you heard from that?

By: Rodney

Rodney — Wed, 27 May 2009 13:21:04 +0000

In reply to Shane Hero. I surely admit that I would like to see the original news team, but NEEDS is a strong word. He NEEDS that supporting cast to be just as funny as this film was, but that supporting cast just needs to do its job as well as these guys did. He needs his news team, but the news team doesn't need to be these actors. (Would still be my preference, but its not absolute) I didn't say they would NOT be suitable as supporting cast. But I also believe that an actor should get paid according to the role he does. Why over pay for an actor who is doing the same job? The only reason that exists is that they pay him because he won't do it for less. He agent says so.