Comments on: Crank 2 Review

By: Sean

Sean — Wed, 22 Dec 2010 20:35:19 +0000

This movie was awesome! This is entertainment at the fullest. Completely different from anything out there and will keep you engaged beginning to end, at least if you have any sense of humor and sense of adventure. Not for the faint at heart, Just remember to take breaths throughout. If you didn’t like this movie then you just don’t get it and I’m talkin about just don’t get it in general, but it’s all good..

By: dpak

dpak — Sat, 02 May 2009 08:27:52 +0000

In reply to Kristina.

no ways kristina……. but im too late amn’t i….

By: AshB

AshB — Tue, 28 Apr 2009 02:44:56 +0000

Talk about representing hyper masculinity. This film is a perfect example of why men have false body images. It reinforced the idea that in order to be tough, you have to go to crazy extremes. We wonder why the size of G.I. Joe has increased over the years????

By: Mike

Mike — Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:59:00 +0000

Absolute. Complete. GARBAGE. I enjoyed the 1st Crank – this one was just stupid. A complete waste of time.

I probably need to give it a little time – but right now I’m thinking this could possibly be the WORST movie I have ever seen. Seriously.

By: 46and2

46and2 — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 22:16:15 +0000

Thanks for a great review, John. I’m with you 100% on your opinion on Statham and shaky cams!

It took me a while to be cognizant of the fact that so much of what we take away from movies was already there in our brains when we went in. Just because I go see it just for the action doesn’t make me a fool. The Cranks, more than anything else I can think of right now, are the epitome of the popcorn flick!

By: paul

paul — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 11:24:06 +0000

if any 1 enjoyed this film then they need a check up from the neck up, its utter nonsense random as hell, cant believe statham agreed to filming this crap. it should be called rank not crank..

By: John

John — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 06:54:27 +0000

In reply to filmreview2009. Oh good. Someone who thinks they're qualified to give an opinion on a movie they only saw 1/6th of. What a genius.

By: filmreview2009

filmreview2009 — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 06:48:25 +0000

this movie is waste of time. pure insenity, pornographic,very trashy,left the theater after watching it for 15 minutes. total garbage!!!

By: jon

jon — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 04:41:43 +0000

I’m interested in seeing it purely for the reason that they shot the entire thing on prosumer HDV cameras. Of course it’s not going to blow up to screen and look like a $45,000 arri camera and film, but for a 20 mill budget, they saved all the money for the action. Just like to see if the digression in picture quality hurt the overall film, considering what it is.

By: Jaime

Jaime — Tue, 21 Apr 2009 01:20:23 +0000

Overall, I thought the first one was better than the second one, because it at least had more of a story to it and it wasn’t trying too hard to be over the top. With that said, I thought crank 2 was awesome and funny as hell. I enjoyed every part of the movie except the ending, the talk show segment (totally pointless), and the puppet fight (what the hell was that all about?). At least the first one tried to be semi serious. I’ll watch this movie again simply because I really enjoyed it.

By: Devan Price

Devan Price — Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:07:44 +0000

In reply to MandarinOrange. They wanted the camera to be like that thus the reason they went out and bought a $3,000. Crank2 is everything the directors wanted Crank to be. they pretty much, tried, redefined this style of filming, and it suites Crank well! IMO

By: thefilmwiz

thefilmwiz — Mon, 20 Apr 2009 06:55:05 +0000

this movie sucked…..big time…but it no surprise, the first one was garbage all the same