Comments on: Fox picks up Chronicles of Narnia: Voyage of the Dawn Treader

By: ngythys

ngythys — Thu, 24 May 2012 08:01:43 +0000

You can find many <a href="http://burberrybags-onsale.org ">Burberry Outlet Store Online</a> now with the google website search ,so that you can buy some <a href="http://burberrybags-onsale.org ">Cheap Burberry Bags</a> directly from the website,you needn't go aboard now if burberry store are not exist in your local city.And the <a href="http://burberrybags-onsale.org ">Burberry Bags On Sale</a> with a incredible price ,you should be happy with them.

By: critter

critter — Tue, 07 Dec 2010 06:26:07 +0000

In reply to Kristina. there was plenty of threats the king was close to die. many chathcers wer ebeing killed for no reason. so yes the movie was needed. as its relative to what we did in the past. prince caspin was one of my favorite movies i see. very dark though.

By: Kristina

Kristina — Sun, 01 Feb 2009 04:32:38 +0000

More Ben Barnes=Happy Kristina

The first film was okay to me. Nothing special. The second one was fairly dull, and the rivalry between Peter and Caspian came across as two high school jocks fighting for a spot on the varsity team rather than two guys fighting for control of a kingdom. The entire film just felt petty and unnecessary. There was no legitimate tension, no real threats to any of the main characters, and nothing was going on plot-wise to keep me interested.

Reepicheep was cool, though.

By: Rodney

Rodney — Sat, 31 Jan 2009 04:25:27 +0000

In reply to Josh.

Nothing to do with quality Josh.

They had to look at the potential the film had to make money. In this harsh financial reality they had to draw a line with profitability on one side and risk on the other.

They simply were not willing to take the risk with money being so tight.

Fox is.

Also, Pixar is part of Disney (again)but Disney makes its own films operating Pixar as a separate entity. Pixar’s releases don’t have anything to do with Disney’s choice to make a film or not.

By: Josh

Josh — Sat, 31 Jan 2009 03:26:12 +0000

The second movie was terrible and Disney apparently agrees with me. This is one of those franchises that will make money even if they release complete garbage a la Fantastic Four. For a fantasy flick, Prince was bland and why make bland “remakes” when you can tell amazingly original engaging stories like Wall-E and Finding Nemo? Thank you Disney for letting go.

By: RonSalon

RonSalon — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:49:46 +0000

In reply to Jon H. I understand your point. Did you see Pan's Labrynth? It cost 19 million dollars and looked like it cost 140 million.

By: Damian

Damian — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:17:38 +0000

I think that both films were great. I watched them both for the second time about a week ago and must say that for whatever reason they are more appealing to me than Harry Potter (sorry HP fans) This films are fantasy filled, with a strong story behind it. I on a personal level like the 2nd film much more than the first one despite the fact that it made less money. Looking forward to a third.

By: Moog

Moog — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:01:38 +0000

In reply to Jon H. Bear in mind that it was made in the 80's

By: 46and2

46and2 — Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:09:26 +0000

In reply to Darek-T. +1, I was just about to say that. It would be a shame if they half-assed this one, but I'll stay optimistic.

By: Darek-T

Darek-T — Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:22:35 +0000

But anyways, I am glad about this because Voyage of the Dawn Treader is the best book (in my opinion)

By: Darek-T

Darek-T — Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:21:41 +0000

In reply to Jon H. Holy Crap Jon H you are absolutely right

By: Jon H

Jon H — Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:11:55 +0000

@RonSalon

See the BBC adaptation of Narnia for why a big budget is important. :P