Comments on: Nolan talks about the Future of Batman

By: Dustin

Dustin — Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:52:35 +0000

As much as I hate to say it, I think the joker has to be in the next movie. The dramatic effect his character had on Gotham makes a Gotham suddenly without him less believable. And while no one can ever play the Joker exactly like Ledger, putting a little spin on him isn’t such a bad thing. There are ways to tweek the character while staying true to Nolan’s dark style. This might sound crazy but I would love to see Mark Hamill give it a try. You not think so but just from a voice standpoint he’s the first voice I envision when thinking of the joker and his character could be a nice mesh of his cartoon version and Nolan’s darker version. As far as Bane, it doesn’t fit with Nolan’s storyline because these are Batman’s early years. Bane doesn’t disable Batman until Robin has left and Robin hasn’t even been introduced and I doubt that he will. If Nolan is trying to stick with the comic storyline he can’t skip that many years in one movie

——————————————————————————–

By: luke

luke — Fri, 12 Dec 2008 00:46:02 +0000

harley really needs to be in.and she can totally be in with out a joker.she can be there trying to destroy gotham for joker’s love/approval.she is super crazy.i mean in the animated series she ran around blowing things up and trying to crush things(and batman) with a mallet,although i’d prefer her to have a sledge in a movie s this realistic.she can just be taking orders from joker at arkam,and the never truly have to show joke maybe a sillohuette or thos like ransom notes could be sent to her.or maybe batman or someone at the begining of the story can be like”she works for jjoker because bklah blah”.
i’m sorry i really don’t like catwoman idt she’d be as entertaining as harls

By: Rodney

Rodney — Wed, 10 Dec 2008 12:33:02 +0000

Nolan made it pretty clear that Two Face was certainly and without a doubt dead. So no… you wont be seeing him.

Secondly, Batman didn’t kill TwoFace. He just didnt save him. Big difference.

By: T_REX

T_REX — Wed, 10 Dec 2008 07:08:54 +0000

I am the world’s biggest TWO-FACE fan and accept the end of the wonderful “Dark Knight” but is it possible that Nolan is pulling our legs
about him ( his bad side, not Harvey ) being dead.
1. They foreshadowed falling from “2” stories when Batman had Marconi
on a balcony.
2. If TwoFace is dead does that mean Batman actually killed him?
3. This is probally a pipedream and if so the Riddler is the next best
villian to use.
your thoughts? anyone?

By: DG Music

DG Music — Tue, 09 Dec 2008 07:35:13 +0000

Agreeeeeed

Thanks Rodney!

By: Darek-T

Darek-T — Tue, 09 Dec 2008 04:41:45 +0000

I read about this also exept i read it on slashfilms and they said that Chris planned that to shoot the entire sequel for IMAX.

By: aaron

aaron — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 23:39:37 +0000

Nolan wouldn’t think twice about casting Jolie for catwoman, no female villains please!!!!

now the riddler i’d love to see

By: LMXV

LMXV — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 23:06:15 +0000

Please stop mentioning Jolie. It’s not gonna happen.

By: Dragonslayer

Dragonslayer — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 22:41:37 +0000

Johnny Depp for Riddler

By: aaron

aaron — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 21:40:34 +0000

i’m glad this news came up!!!!!!!!!
:D :D :D :D

By: Meli

Meli — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 21:37:19 +0000

Reading about Nolan talking about the next Batman flick makes me excited, I’m glad he’s taking time to mulls over ideas and I’m in no hurry for the next film.

I’m a huge Depp fan, but honestly, I’d rather no see him in a Batman movie. In fact, I’d like to continue to be surprised with casting choices.

By: Wayne

Wayne — Mon, 08 Dec 2008 21:31:48 +0000

Edit: That he’s NOT seeing … etc etc.