<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: George Clooney Is For The Birds	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.themovieblog.com/2008/10/george-clooney-is-for-the-birds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2008/10/george-clooney-is-for-the-birds/</link>
	<description>The Correct Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:08:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Darren J Seeley		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2008/10/george-clooney-is-for-the-birds/#comment-169138</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darren J Seeley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=15290#comment-169138</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Go right ahead and do it.  

Yes, you heard right.
DO IT. 

Then the filmmakers (co-prod. Michael Bay among them-is Platinum Dunes still involved?) will be schooled once more that they cannot top Hitchcock&#039;s style. Be assured the remake will contain that schoolyard scene, the beats leading up to it...and being today&#039;s day and age, I&#039;m sure they&#039;ll want to explain everything too.

The main problem here isn&#039;t so much that it is a remake, it is the problem that we know pretty much what they will do with it. While getting a name or two (or a rumored name or two) sounds promising, it doesn&#039;t help.

But I say again, go ahead, Hollywood. Be by guest. Just make your own film, don&#039;t attempt to copy Hitch&#039;s style, don&#039;t boast &quot;we can do with CGI that he couldn&#039;t do then&quot; because while that may be true, those were real 1,000 some birds in that last shot and that&#039;s something you&#039;ll never be able to do even if you glued the bird&#039;s talons to the posts. &lt;em&gt; Do not make the same err that Gus Van Sant made with Psycho&lt;/em&gt;. Don&#039;t try to carbon copy Hitchcock.

By the way, Hollywood did follow the above advice. Back in the 90&#039;s...the Showtime movie &lt;em&gt; Birds II: Land&#039;s End &lt;/em&gt;...you all know how that came out.

As for Clooney?
It&#039;s a great casting idea to be sure. All for naught.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go right ahead and do it.  </p>
<p>Yes, you heard right.<br />
DO IT. </p>
<p>Then the filmmakers (co-prod. Michael Bay among them-is Platinum Dunes still involved?) will be schooled once more that they cannot top Hitchcock&#8217;s style. Be assured the remake will contain that schoolyard scene, the beats leading up to it&#8230;and being today&#8217;s day and age, I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll want to explain everything too.</p>
<p>The main problem here isn&#8217;t so much that it is a remake, it is the problem that we know pretty much what they will do with it. While getting a name or two (or a rumored name or two) sounds promising, it doesn&#8217;t help.</p>
<p>But I say again, go ahead, Hollywood. Be by guest. Just make your own film, don&#8217;t attempt to copy Hitch&#8217;s style, don&#8217;t boast &#8220;we can do with CGI that he couldn&#8217;t do then&#8221; because while that may be true, those were real 1,000 some birds in that last shot and that&#8217;s something you&#8217;ll never be able to do even if you glued the bird&#8217;s talons to the posts. <em> Do not make the same err that Gus Van Sant made with Psycho</em>. Don&#8217;t try to carbon copy Hitchcock.</p>
<p>By the way, Hollywood did follow the above advice. Back in the 90&#8217;s&#8230;the Showtime movie <em> Birds II: Land&#8217;s End </em>&#8230;you all know how that came out.</p>
<p>As for Clooney?<br />
It&#8217;s a great casting idea to be sure. All for naught.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Yamo		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2008/10/george-clooney-is-for-the-birds/#comment-169133</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yamo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=15290#comment-169133</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[so Clooney knows that the bird is the word.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so Clooney knows that the bird is the word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: obi-wan kubrick		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2008/10/george-clooney-is-for-the-birds/#comment-169085</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[obi-wan kubrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=15290#comment-169085</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They need to remake movies that suck. Don&#039;t remake classics.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They need to remake movies that suck. Don&#8217;t remake classics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: theduckthief		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2008/10/george-clooney-is-for-the-birds/#comment-169076</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[theduckthief]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 01:15:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=15290#comment-169076</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[*hangs head* Why must you people interfere with classics? Just leave them alone.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*hangs head* Why must you people interfere with classics? Just leave them alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: StMcL		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2008/10/george-clooney-is-for-the-birds/#comment-169068</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[StMcL]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 23:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=15290#comment-169068</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I agree with Tripp....just leave this one alone please]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Tripp&#8230;.just leave this one alone please</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: entertainmenttodayandbeyond		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2008/10/george-clooney-is-for-the-birds/#comment-169053</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[entertainmenttodayandbeyond]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 21:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=15290#comment-169053</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Clooney needs to do more mainsteam projects.This would be a good movie for him.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clooney needs to do more mainsteam projects.This would be a good movie for him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: michael		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2008/10/george-clooney-is-for-the-birds/#comment-169004</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=15290#comment-169004</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;I am glad that Clooney is on board.&quot;

1. It&#039;s only rumour at this stage
2. In my opinion, if they put a big actor (by no means am I saying that clooney is a good actor), it will ruin any chance of this being a good remake. If Clooney was used, there will be probably a lean towards the love story since that&#039;s what clooney is known for and it is the only way to give him &#039;good lines&#039; (well it is a movie about killer birds after all)

This remake has been in the pipeline for over ten years I&#039;d say at this stage and Tippi has been a strong denouncer of it for a long time. In my opinion, the lower key the remake, the better it turns out (i.e. dawn of the dead,), very few hollywood remakes make the grade (War of the Worlds atleast captured the visual aspect perfectly). If Clooney or any really big star gets the role, you know this remake won&#039;t be about the birds no more....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I am glad that Clooney is on board.&#8221;</p>
<p>1. It&#8217;s only rumour at this stage<br />
2. In my opinion, if they put a big actor (by no means am I saying that clooney is a good actor), it will ruin any chance of this being a good remake. If Clooney was used, there will be probably a lean towards the love story since that&#8217;s what clooney is known for and it is the only way to give him &#8216;good lines&#8217; (well it is a movie about killer birds after all)</p>
<p>This remake has been in the pipeline for over ten years I&#8217;d say at this stage and Tippi has been a strong denouncer of it for a long time. In my opinion, the lower key the remake, the better it turns out (i.e. dawn of the dead,), very few hollywood remakes make the grade (War of the Worlds atleast captured the visual aspect perfectly). If Clooney or any really big star gets the role, you know this remake won&#8217;t be about the birds no more&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tripp Van Easille		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2008/10/george-clooney-is-for-the-birds/#comment-168999</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tripp Van Easille]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 17:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=15290#comment-168999</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Some things need to be left alone. This classic is one of them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some things need to be left alone. This classic is one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
