<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: WALL-E Photos	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/wall-e-photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/wall-e-photos/</link>
	<description>The Correct Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 17:29:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: giren		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/wall-e-photos/#comment-164815</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[giren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 17:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/wall-e-photos#comment-164815</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is the best of Pixar!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the best of Pixar!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bruce		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/wall-e-photos/#comment-135411</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 00:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/wall-e-photos#comment-135411</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Is animation at the point now where the characters are solid objects and are forced to act as if using sign language?  the whole film rides on getting peoples attention by having the textures look a little better than last years Ratatouille( they must have updated there cpu&#039;s) and with lame generic cute acting that is all a robotic character can do.  Pixar is obviously doing there job right if people are going nuts over this movie, but than again there are apart of disney.

jason, dont be so ignorant, if getting with the time is watching walls - e then good luck to u.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is animation at the point now where the characters are solid objects and are forced to act as if using sign language?  the whole film rides on getting peoples attention by having the textures look a little better than last years Ratatouille( they must have updated there cpu&#8217;s) and with lame generic cute acting that is all a robotic character can do.  Pixar is obviously doing there job right if people are going nuts over this movie, but than again there are apart of disney.</p>
<p>jason, dont be so ignorant, if getting with the time is watching walls &#8211; e then good luck to u.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sound Designer Dan		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/wall-e-photos/#comment-135353</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sound Designer Dan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 19:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/wall-e-photos#comment-135353</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[But Johnny 5 was created for combat, Wall-E was just created to clean up the Earth.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But Johnny 5 was created for combat, Wall-E was just created to clean up the Earth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sir Jig-A-Lot		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/wall-e-photos/#comment-135318</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sir Jig-A-Lot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 16:59:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/wall-e-photos#comment-135318</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ho-hum. still can&#039;t get excited about this as nice as those pix look. ever since Monsters Inc ,there seems to be a bi-yearly glut of these. From recent memory only Finding Nemo &#038; the original Shrek stand out.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ho-hum. still can&#8217;t get excited about this as nice as those pix look. ever since Monsters Inc ,there seems to be a bi-yearly glut of these. From recent memory only Finding Nemo &amp; the original Shrek stand out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: AjaxLou		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/wall-e-photos/#comment-135293</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AjaxLou]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 15:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/wall-e-photos#comment-135293</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bruce, explain yourself please.

Everything I&#039;m seeing looks fantastic.  #1 movie of the year coming up.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce, explain yourself please.</p>
<p>Everything I&#8217;m seeing looks fantastic.  #1 movie of the year coming up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: DJ Machismo		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/wall-e-photos/#comment-135282</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DJ Machismo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 14:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/wall-e-photos#comment-135282</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just having Pixar&#039;s name on it is enough to get me interested.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just having Pixar&#8217;s name on it is enough to get me interested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dave		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/wall-e-photos/#comment-135279</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dave]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 14:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/wall-e-photos#comment-135279</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[But isn&#039;t he just a smaller Johnny 5 from Short Circuit?

Dewey from Silent Running - now that was an emotional robot.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But isn&#8217;t he just a smaller Johnny 5 from Short Circuit?</p>
<p>Dewey from Silent Running &#8211; now that was an emotional robot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jason		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/wall-e-photos/#comment-135276</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 14:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/wall-e-photos#comment-135276</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@Bruce, why not back up your claim with facts?  I think Pixar does a fantastic with their films, and a lot of people put very long hours and hard work into a film like this.  It&#039;s called CHANGING WITH THE TIMES.  If you want old-school animation, go watch Felix the Cat.

/rant]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Bruce, why not back up your claim with facts?  I think Pixar does a fantastic with their films, and a lot of people put very long hours and hard work into a film like this.  It&#8217;s called CHANGING WITH THE TIMES.  If you want old-school animation, go watch Felix the Cat.</p>
<p>/rant</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bruce		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2008/05/wall-e-photos/#comment-135269</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 13:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/wall-e-photos#comment-135269</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Look how far the art of animation has  fallen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look how far the art of animation has  fallen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
