Comments on: Lindsay Lohan to go nude for $75,000

By: Omar

Omar — Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:03:37 +0000

And Sharon Stone flashed her snatch and the whole world took notice. And she won an Oscar too.

By: GODFATHER

GODFATHER — Mon, 14 Apr 2008 04:31:06 +0000

Hey, people! Leave the stripper alone and let her get on camera! There’s nothing wrong with being totally naked in a film, and yes, it will make her a better actress… Maybe she’ll get big bucks in porn next!

BTW, for those that don’t think going naked helps get better jobs, Halle Berry did her “topless” scene (which was a big deal) in Swordfish, then a few years later won an Oscar. It can happen!

By: Kristina

Kristina — Sun, 13 Apr 2008 22:00:44 +0000

You’d think that she learned her lesson from those terrible topless photos she took for that magazine a little while back. Remember the giant collective “Meh?” that was let out by the world? They were forgotten in a week. If she thinks that flashing her ginger field is gonna make her credible, she’s got another thing coming. I honestly don’t see why people hyped her up to begin with. She got lucky with Mean Girls, and she was nothing spectacular in that film. She’s never impressed me in any of her films.

By: Mozzerino

Mozzerino — Sun, 13 Apr 2008 20:21:56 +0000

Go for it Lindsay!
Bare it all, no doubt people will take you seriously then!
Look at Pam Anderson. She got naked and all of a sudden everybody thought she was a great actress! That is exactly the way to go.
Man oh man, Lilo get’s more entertaining by the minute. Can’t wait to hear what she does next.
75000$? Wow, I didn’t actually think she would be that cheap. Proves once again that being tabloid fodder doesn’t actually help your career.

By: HisDivineShadow

HisDivineShadow — Sun, 13 Apr 2008 02:22:38 +0000

If she wants to be taken seriously she should take a serious role.

(IMO).
This is just desperation and in the long run will hurt her career.

By: Mattiac

Mattiac — Sat, 12 Apr 2008 20:35:53 +0000

:D Halleluja! I’m so looking forward to finally see her nude! Mmmmmm…

By: Chris Bunker

Chris Bunker — Sat, 12 Apr 2008 19:12:12 +0000

maybe she should do broadway nude that would get her respect im serious

By: EZELL

EZELL — Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:29:13 +0000

Not into to redheads. She is a decent actor and just needs to do roles where she wont be hit to hard by the media. So she should choose roles not where she is nude but really a character we can relate to and care about.

By: leeloo

leeloo — Sat, 12 Apr 2008 18:02:53 +0000

LOL BUSTED! i lmao that she got turned down by the director.

By: Linet

Linet — Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:59:40 +0000

I read the other day that her mom/manager Dina said she wasn’t going to be nude and it’s not even a 100% that she’s going to do the movie.

By: Dave

Dave — Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:30:08 +0000

I agree with Krazie835. It is ridiculous to think that being naked on screen or not would have any correlation to being a good actress. Being naked just to be naked is certainly not the answer and being clothed to have people take you seriously is not the answer either; although it may be a little closer. The point Krazie has is excellent; it is about whether you take a role that challenges your talent and prove to be good or not. That is what being taken seriously is about; acting!

By: Kristina

Kristina — Sat, 12 Apr 2008 16:14:47 +0000

Darren’s right. If a studio can’t get insurance for you while you’re filming their movie, you ain’t getting cast, and at risk stars routinely are not insured. That’s why Favreau had to fight like hell to get Downey for Iron Man.