<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Empire Magazine lists their top ten most underserved Oscars	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.themovieblog.com/2005/02/empire-magazine-lists-their-top-ten-most-underserved-oscars/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2005/02/empire-magazine-lists-their-top-ten-most-underserved-oscars/</link>
	<description>The Correct Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2005 20:40:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Chuck		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2005/02/empire-magazine-lists-their-top-ten-most-underserved-oscars/#comment-18428</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chuck]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2005 20:40:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=1748#comment-18428</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Would Braveheart have been panned so badly if Mel Gibson had not the audicity to make &quot;Passion&quot;?

I doubt it and really think some of this slamming of Braveheart is because of the success of &quot;Passion&quot;.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would Braveheart have been panned so badly if Mel Gibson had not the audicity to make &#8220;Passion&#8221;?</p>
<p>I doubt it and really think some of this slamming of Braveheart is because of the success of &#8220;Passion&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard Brunton		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2005/02/empire-magazine-lists-their-top-ten-most-underserved-oscars/#comment-18427</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard Brunton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2005 18:33:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=1748#comment-18427</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Battle of Britain does acknowledge some of the others that fought alongside Britain during the movie, and has a full acceptance and acknowledgements in the closing credits.

That&#039;s hot off the mobile from my Dad who has watched this more times than I&#039;ve had hot dinners, as he would say, and if I can ever persuade him to post here (when he&#039;s back from holiday) he surely will explain more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Battle of Britain does acknowledge some of the others that fought alongside Britain during the movie, and has a full acceptance and acknowledgements in the closing credits.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s hot off the mobile from my Dad who has watched this more times than I&#8217;ve had hot dinners, as he would say, and if I can ever persuade him to post here (when he&#8217;s back from holiday) he surely will explain more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John Sandstrom		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2005/02/empire-magazine-lists-their-top-ten-most-underserved-oscars/#comment-18426</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Sandstrom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2005 18:11:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=1748#comment-18426</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ok complain all you want about Hollywood rewrites of history.  They do it often enough.  But the movie Saving Private Ryan is not about the British and French efforts on D-Day, it is about the U.S. Ranger platoon and a paratrooper in an American Airborne unit.  Within those boundaries it is rediculous to complain about not mentioning other nations involved.  You might as well complain about Australia, Canada, and South Africa not being mentioned in the movie Battle of Britain.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok complain all you want about Hollywood rewrites of history.  They do it often enough.  But the movie Saving Private Ryan is not about the British and French efforts on D-Day, it is about the U.S. Ranger platoon and a paratrooper in an American Airborne unit.  Within those boundaries it is rediculous to complain about not mentioning other nations involved.  You might as well complain about Australia, Canada, and South Africa not being mentioned in the movie Battle of Britain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2005/02/empire-magazine-lists-their-top-ten-most-underserved-oscars/#comment-18425</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 11:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=1748#comment-18425</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why does there need to be physical violence against me for my views?

I don&#039;t think that films should be historical recreations, but when they are billing themselves as historically based movies then they should at least be that.

I&#039;m not suggesting that they make sure the boat was the same colour and number, or that the planes flew the correct flight path, what I am suggesting is that the over arching plot line be true to history for those historically based and pitched movies.

The worse thing is that Hollywood continues to present America as the power that won the war without a single credit to anyone else who fought for their country.

Fiction is fine, but a recognition of that fact should at least be made. This is not so important when you view it on the individual film, but when you look at it across the range of movies they continue to portray America in this light. That&#039;s where the damage is done.

As for schools, well this is the MovieBlog, not the SchoolBlog, and I really couldn&#039;t comment on what American schools do or don&#039;t do.

Anyway, I&#039;m as annoyed at Braveheart for the same reasons as I am the WWII movies from America. In Hollywood though, it&#039;s a trend.

On learning from movies, whether this is intended or not, it happens. I remember a BBC programme that looked at the effects of movies on children, and it showed that although they realised that violence was all in the movie, they really did pick up on movies that were fiction based and ended up quoting historical facts from the movie and not from history. It was an interesting point that was made.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does there need to be physical violence against me for my views?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that films should be historical recreations, but when they are billing themselves as historically based movies then they should at least be that.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not suggesting that they make sure the boat was the same colour and number, or that the planes flew the correct flight path, what I am suggesting is that the over arching plot line be true to history for those historically based and pitched movies.</p>
<p>The worse thing is that Hollywood continues to present America as the power that won the war without a single credit to anyone else who fought for their country.</p>
<p>Fiction is fine, but a recognition of that fact should at least be made. This is not so important when you view it on the individual film, but when you look at it across the range of movies they continue to portray America in this light. That&#8217;s where the damage is done.</p>
<p>As for schools, well this is the MovieBlog, not the SchoolBlog, and I really couldn&#8217;t comment on what American schools do or don&#8217;t do.</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;m as annoyed at Braveheart for the same reasons as I am the WWII movies from America. In Hollywood though, it&#8217;s a trend.</p>
<p>On learning from movies, whether this is intended or not, it happens. I remember a BBC programme that looked at the effects of movies on children, and it showed that although they realised that violence was all in the movie, they really did pick up on movies that were fiction based and ended up quoting historical facts from the movie and not from history. It was an interesting point that was made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: why you do dat		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2005/02/empire-magazine-lists-their-top-ten-most-underserved-oscars/#comment-18424</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[why you do dat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 06:54:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=1748#comment-18424</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Richard

Maybe I read your post in the wrong manner, and came down to harshly on you. But A movie is a movie, there are a lot of things that America rewrites, but a movie is not the thing you should complain about. For instance, the textbooks in school America rewrites, that&#039;s what we should really be concerned about. Like cc said if you expect to learn your history by looking at a movie you should be pimped slap.
When I watch movies of history I dont use it as a history lesson. I never watched a  few movies on western civilization and then took my test.


People are going to write what they write. Like I said a movie is a movie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Richard</p>
<p>Maybe I read your post in the wrong manner, and came down to harshly on you. But A movie is a movie, there are a lot of things that America rewrites, but a movie is not the thing you should complain about. For instance, the textbooks in school America rewrites, that&#8217;s what we should really be concerned about. Like cc said if you expect to learn your history by looking at a movie you should be pimped slap.<br />
When I watch movies of history I dont use it as a history lesson. I never watched a  few movies on western civilization and then took my test.</p>
<p>People are going to write what they write. Like I said a movie is a movie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: c c		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2005/02/empire-magazine-lists-their-top-ten-most-underserved-oscars/#comment-18423</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[c c]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Feb 2005 03:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=1748#comment-18423</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Braveheart...even for the fiction that it was it wasn&#039;t very good. 

As for American films rewritting history when it comes to film..anyone that expects a history lesson while watching a movie should be slapped.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Braveheart&#8230;even for the fiction that it was it wasn&#8217;t very good. </p>
<p>As for American films rewritting history when it comes to film..anyone that expects a history lesson while watching a movie should be slapped.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2005/02/empire-magazine-lists-their-top-ten-most-underserved-oscars/#comment-18422</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2005 15:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=1748#comment-18422</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;just because no one cares about Canada, doesn&#039;t mean you have to take your depressive state of mind out on the Movie&lt;/i&gt;

Eh? What? Do you know who you&#039;re talking to and about what? I sure as hell don&#039;t. No depression, not Canadian or in Canada (and Canada isn&#039;t a city), and no idea what you&#039;re referring to anyway.

Perhaps you meant my comment about the American cinematic viewpoint that America one the war single handedly, were strong and decisive after Pearl Harbour, captured the code breaking machine that turned the tide on the U-Boat dominance and survived D-Day all alone.

Well regardless of who stars or even if other nationalities who fought in the war are portrayed as a major part, a minor part, or even mentioned, some credit in these movies would be good for these other nations.

That&#039;s not perspective or feeling of events, that&#039;s actual fact. American studios are rewriting the history books, especially of wars, for the big screen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>just because no one cares about Canada, doesn&#8217;t mean you have to take your depressive state of mind out on the Movie</i></p>
<p>Eh? What? Do you know who you&#8217;re talking to and about what? I sure as hell don&#8217;t. No depression, not Canadian or in Canada (and Canada isn&#8217;t a city), and no idea what you&#8217;re referring to anyway.</p>
<p>Perhaps you meant my comment about the American cinematic viewpoint that America one the war single handedly, were strong and decisive after Pearl Harbour, captured the code breaking machine that turned the tide on the U-Boat dominance and survived D-Day all alone.</p>
<p>Well regardless of who stars or even if other nationalities who fought in the war are portrayed as a major part, a minor part, or even mentioned, some credit in these movies would be good for these other nations.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not perspective or feeling of events, that&#8217;s actual fact. American studios are rewriting the history books, especially of wars, for the big screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: why you do dat		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2005/02/empire-magazine-lists-their-top-ten-most-underserved-oscars/#comment-18421</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[why you do dat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2005 07:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=1748#comment-18421</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[so many errors in that last post

Meant to say canada is a country

Meant to say, a funny joke is a funny joke]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>so many errors in that last post</p>
<p>Meant to say canada is a country</p>
<p>Meant to say, a funny joke is a funny joke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: why you do dat		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2005/02/empire-magazine-lists-their-top-ten-most-underserved-oscars/#comment-18420</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[why you do dat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Feb 2005 07:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=1748#comment-18420</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[richard
These are Films that are funded by America. however you feel about the war, that is you. But just because no one cares about Canada, doesn&#039;t mean you have to take your depressive state of mind out on the Movie. If Canada wanted to fight wars and then make a movie they could. No real American would ever want to live there because it is the most boring city ever. 
I dont care about Brits being in the movie either. People like hugh grant dont belong. I&#039;m not even one of those right wing nuts, but from now on lets just post about the movie itself and not try to politicize the movie
Whether it is from your perspective or not it is a great movie. A good movie is a good movie. A good laugh is a good joke is a good joke, now matter how distasteful it was.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>richard<br />
These are Films that are funded by America. however you feel about the war, that is you. But just because no one cares about Canada, doesn&#8217;t mean you have to take your depressive state of mind out on the Movie. If Canada wanted to fight wars and then make a movie they could. No real American would ever want to live there because it is the most boring city ever.<br />
I dont care about Brits being in the movie either. People like hugh grant dont belong. I&#8217;m not even one of those right wing nuts, but from now on lets just post about the movie itself and not try to politicize the movie<br />
Whether it is from your perspective or not it is a great movie. A good movie is a good movie. A good laugh is a good joke is a good joke, now matter how distasteful it was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Richard		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2005/02/empire-magazine-lists-their-top-ten-most-underserved-oscars/#comment-18419</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Richard]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=1748#comment-18419</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You know, I get what John was talking about now, whatever you do you are insulting someone. Someone will infer something from one of your comments and suddenly your an something-hater!

The comment was because I never knew there was an Ireland Online and there&#039;s a surprise that it was giving leading Movie information. I&#039;m equally surprised on the rare occasions when Scottish sites\newspapers do this. Nothing against the Irish.

Geez, can&#039;t believe you picked up on that one and not the other genuine dig!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, I get what John was talking about now, whatever you do you are insulting someone. Someone will infer something from one of your comments and suddenly your an something-hater!</p>
<p>The comment was because I never knew there was an Ireland Online and there&#8217;s a surprise that it was giving leading Movie information. I&#8217;m equally surprised on the rare occasions when Scottish sites\newspapers do this. Nothing against the Irish.</p>
<p>Geez, can&#8217;t believe you picked up on that one and not the other genuine dig!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Scruff		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2005/02/empire-magazine-lists-their-top-ten-most-underserved-oscars/#comment-18418</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scruff]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2005 05:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=1748#comment-18418</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Ireland online of all places&quot;

Highly insulting to us dumb micks. Thanks.
Jackass...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ireland online of all places&#8221;</p>
<p>Highly insulting to us dumb micks. Thanks.<br />
Jackass&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2005/02/empire-magazine-lists-their-top-ten-most-underserved-oscars/#comment-18417</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Feb 2005 04:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=1748#comment-18417</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well Marla that&#039;s a shame :)
Seriously though from what I&#039;ve been able to see from my time on this ball of a planet is that the movies that get nominated for best picture are NEVER the best picture from that year...ever.
Certian movies are bred to be good and others to win awards, it&#039;s like the diference between a purebred dog and a mutt; sure the purebred is pretty, but the mutt&#039;s going to be the better dog.
Oh and the greatest war movie was The Great Escape..Steve McQueen: Total Badass...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Marla that&#8217;s a shame :)<br />
Seriously though from what I&#8217;ve been able to see from my time on this ball of a planet is that the movies that get nominated for best picture are NEVER the best picture from that year&#8230;ever.<br />
Certian movies are bred to be good and others to win awards, it&#8217;s like the diference between a purebred dog and a mutt; sure the purebred is pretty, but the mutt&#8217;s going to be the better dog.<br />
Oh and the greatest war movie was The Great Escape..Steve McQueen: Total Badass&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
