Comments on: Blues Brothers 3

By: Bob Cantrell

Bob Cantrell — Fri, 06 Apr 2012 21:44:24 +0000

id watch it I love the blues brothers and I also loved blues brothers 2000. I hope in the third one the blues mobile is a vic cop ca though.

By: Kris

Kris — Tue, 18 Oct 2005 08:18:59 +0000

For all of you that wish to tell Mr. Aykroyd to “let it go,” maybe you guys should let the guy go. Dan Aykroyd has done more for Blues music than anyone in the past 20 years. He is one of the few people that try to make this world a better place to live in. YES, the whole spirit of the blues brothers died with Belushi but the music did not!

When Dan Aykroyd is Elwood Blues he’s not tryin to be pimped out and not tryin to just make money cause he dont got work. He is one of the few great musicians aside from actor that is trying to keep real music alive and spread it on to genarations to come. Dan did not have alot of authority over Blues Bros 2000, Universal crushed it. They told him he has to make it into a kids movie. thats why it became corny and lost its spirit. If it was up to Aykroyd it would have been a whole differnt movie. If he would do a 3rd film, im sure it would be better than the 2nd. and ofcourse the music would be great. For all of you people that would like Dan Aykroyd to let the blues brothers go, I have something to tell you , The Blues Brothers will always and forever be around.

By: "Briscoe" Bubba Blues

"Briscoe" Bubba Blues — Sun, 31 Jul 2005 06:17:48 +0000

First of all, I would like to say that I think Dan Aykroyd is one of the most talented Writers/Comedians/Actors around today.

I absolutely loved “The Blues Brothers” movie.

I just couldn’t sit still and until March 5, 1982, was hoping that a sequel would be made.

John Belushi was a brilliant Actor/Writer/Comedian and his singing voice had a raw, rough quality that I enjoyed and still enjoy.

But John is gone. When John died, the Blues Brothers died with him.

My message to Dan is to “let go”. I think it’s an insult to John’s memory to try and carry on without him.

The only way you could get any sequel to succeed would be to build yourself a time machine, go back in time, bust Cathy Evelyn Smith on March 4, 1982, get John clean and sober and then bring him forward to the Present.

Dan, I grieve with you and with Judy, but it’s time to let go.

By: Lauren

Lauren — Sun, 26 Jun 2005 20:31:14 +0000

Well I agree with Daniel, A BB3 should be released to teach kids about real music… more than to keep BB fans satisfied

By: Daniel

Daniel — Tue, 21 Jun 2005 07:33:22 +0000

Well, this is my first comment on anything like this, but I believe that there should be a third Blues Brothers movie, not just for the soundtrack, but to give the kids of the next generation and generations to come, to listen to music when it wasn’t electronic crap, which is where the industry seems to be going. We need the craftsmen to be out there doing what they do best, and If there isn’t a third Blues Brothers movie, at least start having some big tours, new recordings, and maybe even a Dual Disc set so people can see how it’s done right, and just seeing people lip synching it a la Ashlee Simpson

By: Rachel

Rachel — Sat, 21 May 2005 16:14:51 +0000

actually Im new to this site so On web sites it’s saying GhostBusters 3 was released in 1998. But I never even heard about Aykroyd making a BB3, I only heard of the original one and BB2000 wich other people say SUCKED. I dunno I never really saw BB2000. I’d liked 2 cause I’m a Aykroyd fan but clue me in people is it worth to watch?

By: the lord work's in mysterious ways

the lord work's in mysterious ways — Sun, 02 Jan 2005 18:41:15 +0000

i really don’t against the idea ’cause they already continued the story.well second movie haven’t finished syory.but they has to wait like 4-5years more…hope nobody dies…

By: Al-xx

Al-xx — Tue, 07 Dec 2004 09:11:10 +0000

My recommendation after seeing BB2K was: Buy the soundtrack and go see the original again.

There is no potential in BB3, but there might be in it’s soundtrack! I think this is worth mentioning.

From Sweden with love
/Al-xx

By: Mark

Mark — Mon, 06 Dec 2004 20:46:36 +0000

There goes Aykroyd pimping out BB again, as if BB 2000 and the (little-seen) animated series didn’t suck enough.

There isn’t going to be a Ghostbusters 3 because Bill Murray owns part of the rights and he won’t let Aykroyd exploit that franchise to death. The only chance for a GB-3 may be if the Wilson brothers and Wes Anderson would like to do it, and star in it, and ask Murray for the rights — they seem to be on better terms with Bill Murray than Ackryod these days.

By: Simone

Simone — Mon, 06 Dec 2004 16:48:45 +0000

Isn’t there a plan for a 3rd Ghostbuster movie?

I did enjoy Dan Aykroyd’s performance in “Grosse Point Blank”