<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Tons of Info on Transporter 2 &#8212; They don&#8217;t, mind you, answer the question: Why??	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.themovieblog.com/2004/06/tons-of-info-on-transporter-2-they-dont-mind-you-answer-the-question-why/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2004/06/tons-of-info-on-transporter-2-they-dont-mind-you-answer-the-question-why/</link>
	<description>The Correct Opinion</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 14:48:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: evren		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2004/06/tons-of-info-on-transporter-2-they-dont-mind-you-answer-the-question-why/#comment-5809</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[evren]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 May 2005 14:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=590#comment-5809</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[ok
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: CreditYeti		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2004/06/tons-of-info-on-transporter-2-they-dont-mind-you-answer-the-question-why/#comment-5808</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CreditYeti]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 11:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=590#comment-5808</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The first was awful ... trully bad. The concept was wicked and even the first 10 minutes showed promise but, as many have echoed, when he started breaking his own rules the film went down hill fast.
For me, its not even the type of cheesy film that can surprise you on late night TV. It was just bad, bad, bad. They should scrap the &#039;kids based&#039; plot and make the second flick much darker and more Leon than Lion King.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first was awful &#8230; trully bad. The concept was wicked and even the first 10 minutes showed promise but, as many have echoed, when he started breaking his own rules the film went down hill fast.<br />
For me, its not even the type of cheesy film that can surprise you on late night TV. It was just bad, bad, bad. They should scrap the &#8216;kids based&#8217; plot and make the second flick much darker and more Leon than Lion King.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: KungFuGuy		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2004/06/tons-of-info-on-transporter-2-they-dont-mind-you-answer-the-question-why/#comment-5807</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KungFuGuy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 06:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=590#comment-5807</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Perhaps they should call the 2nd movie. The Transporter: Where did that second truck go? The first one had it&#039;s moments as well as the ultra sweet Shu Qi. But then again, they did lose an entire second truck full of refugees during that climactic car chase. It all kind of balances out to leave me with &#039;Meh&#039;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps they should call the 2nd movie. The Transporter: Where did that second truck go? The first one had it&#8217;s moments as well as the ultra sweet Shu Qi. But then again, they did lose an entire second truck full of refugees during that climactic car chase. It all kind of balances out to leave me with &#8216;Meh&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dmiller23462		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2004/06/tons-of-info-on-transporter-2-they-dont-mind-you-answer-the-question-why/#comment-5806</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dmiller23462]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2004 02:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=590#comment-5806</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That particular movie fell into my &quot;download it&quot; category....I never paid a cent to enjoy it and I&#039;m quite happy about that....I could tell that it looked like one that might be a better rental/download than a theatre viewing....

That&#039;s just me though...

And by the way, I contribute a pretty decent chunk to the movie industry so I don&#039;t feel so bad about downloading DIVX movies....Out of the 50 or so movies that I have downloaded (good quality) I actually own about 20-25 of them on DVD and have seen them in the theatre....If Hollywood would make more quality movies, I wouldn&#039;t be so drawn to the internet...he he he he...

Any other DIVX fans out there?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That particular movie fell into my &#8220;download it&#8221; category&#8230;.I never paid a cent to enjoy it and I&#8217;m quite happy about that&#8230;.I could tell that it looked like one that might be a better rental/download than a theatre viewing&#8230;.</p>
<p>That&#8217;s just me though&#8230;</p>
<p>And by the way, I contribute a pretty decent chunk to the movie industry so I don&#8217;t feel so bad about downloading DIVX movies&#8230;.Out of the 50 or so movies that I have downloaded (good quality) I actually own about 20-25 of them on DVD and have seen them in the theatre&#8230;.If Hollywood would make more quality movies, I wouldn&#8217;t be so drawn to the internet&#8230;he he he he&#8230;</p>
<p>Any other DIVX fans out there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Day-vuh		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2004/06/tons-of-info-on-transporter-2-they-dont-mind-you-answer-the-question-why/#comment-5805</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Day-vuh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2004 23:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=590#comment-5805</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yes.  Truly larger than I.

To be honest, I only saw half of the film, but wasn&#039;t intrigued enough to keep watching when I came back to it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.  Truly larger than I.</p>
<p>To be honest, I only saw half of the film, but wasn&#8217;t intrigued enough to keep watching when I came back to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bubba		</title>
		<link>https://www.themovieblog.com/2004/06/tons-of-info-on-transporter-2-they-dont-mind-you-answer-the-question-why/#comment-5804</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bubba]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2004 23:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=590#comment-5804</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The first one wasn&#039;t bad, actually.  Nothing spectacular but it had a good number of fun moments.  Jason Statham was surprisingly believable, too ... he obviously trained hard to get ready for the role.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first one wasn&#8217;t bad, actually.  Nothing spectacular but it had a good number of fun moments.  Jason Statham was surprisingly believable, too &#8230; he obviously trained hard to get ready for the role.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
