I don’t think Michael Moore wants the PG OR PG-13 rating to fill more seats. He wants TEENS TO WATCH IT. I don’t know if anyone watched the shitty Mtv Movie Awards, but Moore was on their plugging his doc. It’s obvious that Moore wants KIDS to see his film. Yeah, kids can still sneak into an R film, but it’s easier for him and others if it were just PG-13.
But still, I don’t know if releasing Farenheit 9/11 on the 25th was such a good idea seeing as Spiderman 2 (first one was RECORD BREAKING) is being released on the 30th. And he wants AVERAGE KIDS to watch it?
Hey, average kid! Would you rather watch Spiderman 2, the sequel to the first movie that has Tobey Maguire, Kirsten Dunst, and some REALLY COOL SPECIAL F/X, huh?, HUH?!, or do you wanna watch the new Michael Moore documentary about President Bush, Farenheit 9/11? Hmmmmm….

1) I’m surprised that people are surprised at this. The US is Saddam’s enemy – they’ve been bombing the hell out of his country for the past 13 years. They’ve held and maintained a strict No-Fly zone over his country. Of course Saddam had intent against the US.

2) There has never been any proof that he had any means to pull this off. The UN Sanctions in 1998 were exhaustive and the 2003 UN investigations including this so-called “war” have still, yielded nothing. “Intent” is very different than “Has the means”.

3) IF there really *was* military strongholds capable of mass destruction in iraq, besides the fact that the US or ANYONE would’ve found it by now, I think Saddam would’ve been hiding THERE instead of in a hole in his family’s backyard.

4) In the exactly same news report you referenced, it is also stated that Putin has had no proof of Iraq involvement in any terrorist act. (Which we already knew anyway)

5) Still, in the same report — whatever proof that Putin had of Saddam’s distaste for the US (obvious) — whatever it was, wasn’t a big enough deal for Putin to even endorse attacking it – because he’s STILL AGAINST IT.

Bush telling the US Public and Congress that Iraq had:
– 30,000 operating weapons facilities
(State of the Union Address; 2003)

– The capability to launch Chemical and biological weapons within 45 minutes of receiving the order.
Speech from the Rose Garden on Thursday Sept. 26, 2002

– Received Uranium from Africa
(State of the Union Address; 2003)

– had Weapons of Mass Destruction
(State of the Union Address; 2003) and a pissload of other times

…ARE ALL LIES – they have repeatedly been shown to be extremely false. And yet, they we’re conveyed to you, the public, and to Congress as truth. When, at best, they weren’t and are still not provable – And at worst, they were out and out lies.

It is a Federal Crime to knowingly lie and mislead Congress.

The 9-11 Commission with its entire team of investigators and researchers deny any link.

Bush said with 100% certainty there was Weapons of Mass Destruction with 0% percent certainty or proof of where they were. Brilliance. Sheer Brilliance.

Even Colin Powell has admitted that the WMD claims were faulty:
http://slate.msn.com/id/2100684/ -and-
http://www.thenation.com/capitalgames/index.mhtml?bid=3&pid=1442 -and-

http://www.globalfreepress.com/article.pl?sid=04/01/25/1733258&mode=thread

Under that pretense, according to you, Iraq was invaded because Saddam – even though he has no MEANS to attack us – doesn’t LIKE us. La-dee-fricking-dah. A *LOT* of people don’t like other people.

– Mind you, in most situations, the person doing the “not liking” isn’t in possession of Hundreds of Billions of dollars in oil.

Iraq was attacked for nothing except profit. And maybe a chip off a shoulder from Gulf War I.

Ah.. end of lesson.

…Now watch this drive…