Comments on: Jurassic Park 4 File this

By: Ian Garcia

Ian Garcia — Sun, 09 Oct 2005 05:42:42 +0000

Yo, Maxime! YOU in JP4? …NO. I heard that they already got a teenager for the part! Some 16 year Old, from Carrollton Texas. His name is unknown, but his initials are E.C. Anyway, the book was obiuosly better than the movie, but the movie was AWESOME! I heard that they are going overboard with the fouth one, in a good way, something about no island and maybe dinos in the city! And yes, they should make a LONG trilogy on Jurassic Park, because if it is a dino movie that isn’t Jurassic park, then it’s a dino movie that’s not worth your money or even attention for that matter!

By: Jason Christopher

Jason Christopher — Thu, 18 Aug 2005 00:22:50 +0000

Now from what i hear that Steven Speilberg or whoever was on a contract to do 6 films total, which would be great. Now a lot of people are probably concerned about movie 4 and any film after that, but it is quite simple, go back to the first Island, for god sakes the first island is where the first movie was, so go back there is a lot more things on that island that we haven’t seen. Has anyone here read the book, i’ve read it twice. and if they go back to the first island, there is enough stuff that is in the book that aint in the movies that could make a story line to last at least three more movies 4,5,and6. I mean take the little boy from the first movie, he would be a full grown adult by now, and in the story he could be getting out of college, and into the world decides to go to the first island that he was on as a kid, bring some colleques with him and so forth and so on. I like the concept of part four taking us away from the island, and taking us somewhere new, but the talks of there not being a T-rex, in the fourth, that would piss off a lot of people, since he was killed off so quickly in the 3rd. and put new dinos in. We only got a small taste of the dilophosoarus, just a small seen, and it was only one, in per shot. have at least more than one of em in a shot, plus you got water dinos like mosasaurus, or Pleisiosaurus, you could have an underwater adventure scenario but more intense than the one in part three and actually go underwater. or you have dinos like inostrancevia, oviraptor, or Allosaurus. In the book they explain a cave type environment. Come on lets get creative there must be a 4, 5, and 6.

By: Mecho

Mecho — Tue, 09 Aug 2005 20:46:51 +0000

I do agree a little with a previous comment stating that the movie was nothing like the book and left the fan disappointed somewhat with the movie. However, the 1st movie was still a blockbuster…it set the movie making world up for what it is doing today…making visual stunners. The plot of the movie was excellent and the acting was very good. Jurassic Park was the breakout movie of its time. Now, the second movie strayed away from the granduer of the first and got wasted on sorry acting…but again the visual effects were good. The plot was pretty dry and there were too many characters. The 3rd movie was insulting stupid. Instead of following a better story line or even the same look of the dinosaurs…the movie completely bombed. It was made to get a quick buck and squeeze the last bit of life from the few Jurrasic Park fans left. I love the premise of the stories…they are simply fantastic…but more work needs to be put into the plot instead of just the dinosaurs. Bring back the old cast and think a little more about movie quality and this franshise may just evolve again!!!

By: God4areason

God4areason — Mon, 08 Aug 2005 18:06:19 +0000

I agree, no. 3 was a HUGE letdown and I feel no. 4 will be worse because they’re using the same old story over and over again, just mixing it about. I reckon they need some fresh ideas before they start filming (or have they started? Tell me quick, please) and I don’t care how long it takes for them to find some new ideas – although I’m pretty anxious since I loved 1 + 2 – as long as they get a good movie into people’s heads!

By: Fiona Kelbrick

Fiona Kelbrick — Wed, 13 Jul 2005 12:17:08 +0000

I think all the movies is great!The second movie was awesome,the 3 one is not to bad,and the 1 one was exellent.I just can’t wait for the 4th one.I wonder how the raptors will look like!

By: Ghisa

Ghisa — Tue, 12 Jul 2005 13:01:02 +0000

I think the first movie was the best, the second one was good too but… and the third one OHHHH!!, It was really a big disappointment.Hope the 4th one is the best.It will be excellent if spielburg directs it.

By: maxime

maxime — Sat, 01 Jan 2005 04:35:51 +0000

i like the 3 film better then the 2 one and the 4 film i’m gonna be in it

By: Pdftluefire

Pdftluefire — Sat, 10 Jan 2004 02:15:39 +0000

Ok. I think this. None of the moives will get old.

By: Jake

Jake — Fri, 09 Jan 2004 22:19:29 +0000

First of all, yes the books were better than the movies. But that really doesn’t matter since the movies, yes all of them, were really good. For anyone to say they didn’t enjoy the first is just nuts. The second one did kind of drag itself out a bit too much, but was still good. And the third was awesome. It had all the action of the other films condensed down into an hour and a half. I’m sure I’ll enjoy part four, and I’m sure I’ll *really* enjoy it if Keira Knightly is in it.

By: Day-vuhl

Day-vuhl — Thu, 08 Jan 2004 20:38:07 +0000

Whoa whoa…

7 bucks?
Where are you seeing movies for 7 bucks…

By: Herby

Herby — Thu, 08 Jan 2004 12:44:51 +0000

I guess I will be in the minority here, but I think all THREE jurassic park films bit the big one.

How anyone could enjoy the first film after reading the book is beyond me. The book, an incredibly suspenful sci-fi thriller had me turning the pages so fast I needed a transfusion from all the paper cuts. I couldn’t wait to see it translated to film.
Unfortunatly, none of it was.

The second and third film were laugh out loud funny (although not meant to be).

However, Spielberg gave the world “Schindler’s List”, so if he wishes he could do Jurrasic 55. Just don’t expect me to shell out another 7 bucks for it.

By: Nick

Nick — Thu, 08 Jan 2004 09:34:03 +0000

I think that the first movie was the best and that the second wasn’t so bad. The third was shit, but i hink that was due to the first two were originally books and the third was just a movie script and wasn’t written but Michael Chrichton, all that said I still can’t wait for number 4