Actress Sarah Jessica Parker has said she is definitely up for a third ‘Sex and the City’ film.
She told the LA Times : ‘I would go back. I think there’s one more story to tell. I know there is.”
While the good news (if you want to see it that way) is that she doesn’t feel a new ‘Sex and the City’ film would be done off at least five years down the road, she feels Michael Patrick King, who wrote the series, could write a good script.
I concur-! I have no doubt that a good or even great script could be written, be it next year or in five years. That said….
I would rather be waterboarded. Because, it may might very well look good on paper. But where was the rabid fanbase for last summer’s sequel? Wait—there *was* a sequel, right? Oh yes…if you blinked, you missed it. The first film was annoying by itself, but at least the folks behind it wrapped up loose ends and had Big marry Carrie. While it could be that a whole new set of gal pals would take the mantle (Jennifer Hudson among them), it was not meant to be.
Sex and The City is wearing out its’ welcome. It is time to move on. The characters of Sex are self-centered and spoiled. Some other actions in the series, such as talking about things we have already seen, may have worked in the show. It gets grating in film. It is a different medium, and they failed to adapt to that medium. That’s what happened with the sequel. Nobody cared, and those that did were bored out of their brains. The sequel bombed badly. I doubt another Sex and the City film will be made unless it is either DTV or waiting not five years, but ten to fifteen when some joker reboots it.
With Aldo.
More ‘Sex’. Int’ friends? No, it’s not a trick question…
I am extremely inspired together with your writing abilities and also with the structure for your weblog. Is this a paid theme or did you modify it yourself? Anyway keep up the excellent high quality writing, it is uncommon to look a great weblog like this one today..
:)
Bring in Betty White as a new younger friend and I will be all for it.
ill have to agree while i ahve not seen sex and the city two i have eard it was really bad. ill always say that number one was good for those who were fans of the series but right now they are doing as you say “floggin a dead hoarse”
This is way more helpful than antiyhng else I’ve looked at.
Sex and the City 2 was about 146 minutes long which is about the same length as 2001: A Space Odyssey, in which Stanley Kubrick goes from the birth of mankind to the birth of a new species and in Sex and the City 2 it goes from a group of totally consumerist, obsessed characters and ends with them been totally consumerist, obsessed characters.
Grumpy Old Whores should be the next Title..
anybody else agree.
They should reboot the title with younger hotter females if they are gonna keep making this trash.
No! I didn’t even need a second one. They stopped doing the show because they didn’t want to kill a good thing. And now they’re beating the poor dead horse over and over and over again. Leave him alone! He’s tired!
Honestly, I don’t understand why they make SATC movies so rarly. These girls make a lot of money with it and the odience seems to love it.
My girlfriend took me to see SATC 2…by far the worst film iv ever seen
no…nuff said.
There wasn’t a story to tell from the get go, there certainly isn’t one to tell at this point.