<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who Watches Watchmen 2?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2010/02/who-watches-watchmen-2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2010/02/who-watches-watchmen-2</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:43:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DG Music</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2010/02/who-watches-watchmen-2#comment-242414</link>
		<dc:creator>DG Music</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 17:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=25308#comment-242414</guid>
		<description>AGREEEEED</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AGREEEEED</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripp van easille</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2010/02/who-watches-watchmen-2#comment-242303</link>
		<dc:creator>tripp van easille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 19:31:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=25308#comment-242303</guid>
		<description>Aen&#039;t we all waiting on that &quot;January 2010&quot; announcement from DC/WB on the plans for the rest of the franchises? maybe they should concentrate on things that just might be successful if handled right. 
I loved Watchmen and would really enjoy seeing Malin Akerman don the Silk Spectre II outfit again, but.....priorities folks, please!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aen&#8217;t we all waiting on that &#8220;January 2010&#8243; announcement from DC/WB on the plans for the rest of the franchises? maybe they should concentrate on things that just might be successful if handled right.<br />
I loved Watchmen and would really enjoy seeing Malin Akerman don the Silk Spectre II outfit again, but&#8230;..priorities folks, please!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2010/02/who-watches-watchmen-2#comment-242285</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 10:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=25308#comment-242285</guid>
		<description>I was in the same boat. Never read the books. Absolutely loved the movie. Favorite of 09 by far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was in the same boat. Never read the books. Absolutely loved the movie. Favorite of 09 by far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Odoakar</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2010/02/who-watches-watchmen-2#comment-242167</link>
		<dc:creator>Odoakar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 11:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=25308#comment-242167</guid>
		<description>After completely raping Moore&#039;s &#039;The League...&#039;, and doing the same with From Hell (and some might include V for Vendetta here), this will probably be the last nail the Hollywood would be placing in Mr. Moore&#039;s eyes.

I feel sorry for the guy. He doesn&#039;t want to see his graphic novels be made into Hollywood movies, but he just doesn&#039;t have a say in that when the publishing houses see those $ marks in front of their eyes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After completely raping Moore&#8217;s &#8216;The League&#8230;&#8217;, and doing the same with From Hell (and some might include V for Vendetta here), this will probably be the last nail the Hollywood would be placing in Mr. Moore&#8217;s eyes.</p>
<p>I feel sorry for the guy. He doesn&#8217;t want to see his graphic novels be made into Hollywood movies, but he just doesn&#8217;t have a say in that when the publishing houses see those $ marks in front of their eyes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricci</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2010/02/who-watches-watchmen-2#comment-242163</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 09:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=25308#comment-242163</guid>
		<description>I loved watchmen, and have seen it several times now - never knew what it was or what to expect before I stepped into the cinema and I was also floored by how great this film was, even reading this artical has me thinking about putting that blu-ray in when I get home from work and watching it again.

Watchmen 2..........I have thoughts of yes...I want to see more comedian, I&#039;d love to see more of his early days, leading to his downfall, but more than that I think NO, no no no, I can&#039;t see it being any good, I see a film made for cash and effect, it will lose it&#039;s magic, it&#039;s originality, it&#039;s essense.

Leave it alone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved watchmen, and have seen it several times now &#8211; never knew what it was or what to expect before I stepped into the cinema and I was also floored by how great this film was, even reading this artical has me thinking about putting that blu-ray in when I get home from work and watching it again.</p>
<p>Watchmen 2&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.I have thoughts of yes&#8230;I want to see more comedian, I&#8217;d love to see more of his early days, leading to his downfall, but more than that I think NO, no no no, I can&#8217;t see it being any good, I see a film made for cash and effect, it will lose it&#8217;s magic, it&#8217;s originality, it&#8217;s essense.</p>
<p>Leave it alone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Castle91 (formerly War-Journalist)</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2010/02/who-watches-watchmen-2#comment-242155</link>
		<dc:creator>Castle91 (formerly War-Journalist)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 07:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=25308#comment-242155</guid>
		<description>Who Watches The &quot;Watchmen 2&quot;?
Nobody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who Watches The &#8220;Watchmen 2&#8243;?<br />
Nobody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James(haz)</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2010/02/who-watches-watchmen-2#comment-242146</link>
		<dc:creator>James(haz)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 05:18:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=25308#comment-242146</guid>
		<description>Horrible idea???

ok.
ShamWow was a horrible idea.
Taco Bell&#039;s black taco was a horrible idea.
The movie Critters was a horrible idea.

THIS, is an aggressively offensive idea of apocalyptic seriousness and satan-ish proportions</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Horrible idea???</p>
<p>ok.<br />
ShamWow was a horrible idea.<br />
Taco Bell&#8217;s black taco was a horrible idea.<br />
The movie Critters was a horrible idea.</p>
<p>THIS, is an aggressively offensive idea of apocalyptic seriousness and satan-ish proportions</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 420Band</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2010/02/who-watches-watchmen-2#comment-242137</link>
		<dc:creator>420Band</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 03:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=25308#comment-242137</guid>
		<description>Leave it be..in other words</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leave it be..in other words</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 420Band</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2010/02/who-watches-watchmen-2#comment-242135</link>
		<dc:creator>420Band</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 03:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=25308#comment-242135</guid>
		<description>Here here.

Why go back or ....forth for that matter. Shit , I mean the Dr. Manhattan stuff was brilliant enough in print on film, to a lessoer extent but effective never-the-less.

what am I talking about?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here here.</p>
<p>Why go back or &#8230;.forth for that matter. Shit , I mean the Dr. Manhattan stuff was brilliant enough in print on film, to a lessoer extent but effective never-the-less.</p>
<p>what am I talking about?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2010/02/who-watches-watchmen-2#comment-242134</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 03:19:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=25308#comment-242134</guid>
		<description>I did like it plenty.  The books were better for what they did and what they represent in the world of comics, and the movie was faithful and amazing.

But it is what it is.  And that is done and perfect all on its own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did like it plenty.  The books were better for what they did and what they represent in the world of comics, and the movie was faithful and amazing.</p>
<p>But it is what it is.  And that is done and perfect all on its own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

