<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Avatar Hits #2 WorldWide in 20 Days</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2010/01/avatar-hits-2-worldwide-in-20-days/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2010/01/avatar-hits-2-worldwide-in-20-days</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:35:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: middleman</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2010/01/avatar-hits-2-worldwide-in-20-days#comment-238625</link>
		<dc:creator>middleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jan 2010 00:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=24417#comment-238625</guid>
		<description>Great analysis.  One thing to add, though.  A possible Oscar nomination could renew interest and renew box office about the time it would be playing out on its own; especially if the viewers are directed to IMAX $creenings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great analysis.  One thing to add, though.  A possible Oscar nomination could renew interest and renew box office about the time it would be playing out on its own; especially if the viewers are directed to IMAX $creenings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 420BAND</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2010/01/avatar-hits-2-worldwide-in-20-days#comment-238621</link>
		<dc:creator>420BAND</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 23:30:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=24417#comment-238621</guid>
		<description>20 days.....HOLY SHIT!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>20 days&#8230;..HOLY SHIT!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 420BAND</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2010/01/avatar-hits-2-worldwide-in-20-days#comment-238620</link>
		<dc:creator>420BAND</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 23:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=24417#comment-238620</guid>
		<description>Go Cameron GO! 

funny to see The Bat on the bottom all lonely and sad looking.....

well at least he&#039;s not wearing hockey pants!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go Cameron GO! </p>
<p>funny to see The Bat on the bottom all lonely and sad looking&#8230;..</p>
<p>well at least he&#8217;s not wearing hockey pants!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lumpy Krump</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2010/01/avatar-hits-2-worldwide-in-20-days#comment-238587</link>
		<dc:creator>Lumpy Krump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=24417#comment-238587</guid>
		<description>Interesting comments on repeat viewing. Everyone I know has seen it at least 2 or 3 times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting comments on repeat viewing. Everyone I know has seen it at least 2 or 3 times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lumpy Krump</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2010/01/avatar-hits-2-worldwide-in-20-days#comment-238586</link>
		<dc:creator>Lumpy Krump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=24417#comment-238586</guid>
		<description>Top 10 from Box Office Mojo adjusted for inflation:

1. Gone With the Wind
2. Star Wars
3. The Sound of Music
4. ET
5. 10 Commandments
6. Titanic
7. Jaws
8. Dr. Zhivago
9. The Exorcist
10. Snow White &amp; the 7 Dwarfs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Top 10 from Box Office Mojo adjusted for inflation:</p>
<p>1. Gone With the Wind<br />
2. Star Wars<br />
3. The Sound of Music<br />
4. ET<br />
5. 10 Commandments<br />
6. Titanic<br />
7. Jaws<br />
8. Dr. Zhivago<br />
9. The Exorcist<br />
10. Snow White &amp; the 7 Dwarfs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lumpy Krump</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2010/01/avatar-hits-2-worldwide-in-20-days#comment-238585</link>
		<dc:creator>Lumpy Krump</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 19:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=24417#comment-238585</guid>
		<description>I saw it three times and will probably go for a 4th.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I saw it three times and will probably go for a 4th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaneda979</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2010/01/avatar-hits-2-worldwide-in-20-days#comment-238578</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaneda979</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 18:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=24417#comment-238578</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s amazing. I hope it does make it to #1, but it wont be easy still indeed. But if it does, it&#039;ll be sad for me to see Dark Knight get dropped off the top 5. I can see it taking a Top 10 Domestic spot for sure.

This kind of thing also makes me think about all those people that have to go out and see it. And how allot of them have to be people who don&#039;t go out to see movies very often or even not at all. For a movie to have that kind of draw is indeed astounding. 

Not to mention, this is an epic Sci-Fi movie, which has got to be HUGE for the Sci-Fi movie genre.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s amazing. I hope it does make it to #1, but it wont be easy still indeed. But if it does, it&#8217;ll be sad for me to see Dark Knight get dropped off the top 5. I can see it taking a Top 10 Domestic spot for sure.</p>
<p>This kind of thing also makes me think about all those people that have to go out and see it. And how allot of them have to be people who don&#8217;t go out to see movies very often or even not at all. For a movie to have that kind of draw is indeed astounding. </p>
<p>Not to mention, this is an epic Sci-Fi movie, which has got to be HUGE for the Sci-Fi movie genre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anti-Septic</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2010/01/avatar-hits-2-worldwide-in-20-days#comment-238569</link>
		<dc:creator>Anti-Septic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=24417#comment-238569</guid>
		<description>I hope it crushes Titanic, I didnt dislike Titanic but I have seen so many different Titanic movies before Cameron&#039;s version I just didnt see the point of it. I surely didnt pay to see it at theater either!

Heck I liked the Poseiden Adventure (1972) better than Cameron&#039;s Titanic.  

Go Avatar!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope it crushes Titanic, I didnt dislike Titanic but I have seen so many different Titanic movies before Cameron&#8217;s version I just didnt see the point of it. I surely didnt pay to see it at theater either!</p>
<p>Heck I liked the Poseiden Adventure (1972) better than Cameron&#8217;s Titanic.  </p>
<p>Go Avatar!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2010/01/avatar-hits-2-worldwide-in-20-days#comment-238557</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 16:50:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=24417#comment-238557</guid>
		<description>There is a countermanding effect to the higher price as well. A higher price means you need a better movie to get some people out to theaters. If you want to know how many people really went to see it divide the boxoffice by the ticket price. ~133.1 million people (or repeated people) have seen Avitar
~283.5 million people saw titanic. About twice as many. 
But does it really matter? I think when you weigh out how much more they made from higher ticket prices versus how much harder it is to get people to come due to higher prices, it has to level the playing field at least a little.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a countermanding effect to the higher price as well. A higher price means you need a better movie to get some people out to theaters. If you want to know how many people really went to see it divide the boxoffice by the ticket price. ~133.1 million people (or repeated people) have seen Avitar<br />
~283.5 million people saw titanic. About twice as many.<br />
But does it really matter? I think when you weigh out how much more they made from higher ticket prices versus how much harder it is to get people to come due to higher prices, it has to level the playing field at least a little.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2010/01/avatar-hits-2-worldwide-in-20-days#comment-238550</link>
		<dc:creator>Angie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 16:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=24417#comment-238550</guid>
		<description>These numbers are all great and all, but I want to see how they compare when you take in inflation and rising tickets prices.  How many people really went to see it? That&#039;s what I always know.  Its easier to hit a higher mark when the acceptable ticket price today is $8.50 but how does that compare when it used to be $6.50?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These numbers are all great and all, but I want to see how they compare when you take in inflation and rising tickets prices.  How many people really went to see it? That&#8217;s what I always know.  Its easier to hit a higher mark when the acceptable ticket price today is $8.50 but how does that compare when it used to be $6.50?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

