And Jewish women’s garb looked nothing like victorian era dresses. Google it. She doesnt look at all like a woman of that era.

Keep saying it and even you might believe it.

You dont have to like the poster, but you are seriously over reacting.

I have seen far worse get put out to promote a film so this isn’t a bad thing.

And it speaks volumes to the film, you just insist on everything being spelled out to you and will argue until even you believe what you are saying.

All im saying is that the 2nd poster was horribly done and doesnt do ANYTHING a poster should. If you wanna hang it up on your wall go ahead. To me, its a pitiful excuse of a poster

I actually think its fake, i dont believe a professional would green light this “poster”

Theyre running with the first one which, shockingly SHOWS the wolfman… theres no way theyll post the 2nd one in movie theaters with a straight face

And yes, lots of them hid on forests Rodney. Are you telling me Jewish people never ran into the forests to hide from Nazis? MOST of them did that!

Its a stupid poster. It says Wolfman, yet it shows some girl wearing a dress. Its like having a poster that says “Spider-Man 4″ but only shows a red boot. “But the poster says spiderman, so we can guess who wears the boot!” are you f#@$ing serious!? lmao xD

Its not blatantly unrelated, what i said is more fitting to this poster then a werewolf.

It would make a good SAT question though:

“Match the movie with the poster”
Wolfman or The Crucible.

No one would pick the Wolfman as an answer, and unfortunately, theyd all be wrong (DAMN YOU, tricky SAT questions, with your sneaky loop holes!)

The poster SAYS The Wolfman, so we get an idea who she’s scared of already, and shes in the woods in a Victorian Era dress, hiding behind a tree with a look of fear on her face. All of that screams that there is a girl in the Victorian era, running/hiding away from something terrifying. Oh look, the title says The Wolfman, I guess that’s it.

Not Nazis, not blind, not cancer stricken children. None of that.

You are stretching it so thin there is nothing there.

You are free to dislike the poster if you want, the first one up there is likely more to your liking as it spells it all out for you. Wolfman, and a picture of a Wolfman.

But when your rationale is that you have to invent something so blatantly unrelated in order to mock it, you defeat your own stance.