<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sony Acquires film rights to Risk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2009/11/sony-acquires-film-rights-to-risk/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/11/sony-acquires-film-rights-to-risk</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:43:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: VIc De Zen</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/11/sony-acquires-film-rights-to-risk#comment-230753</link>
		<dc:creator>VIc De Zen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:19:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=23017#comment-230753</guid>
		<description>Is this movie going to be as long in duration just like the amount of time it takes to play the board game? =P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this movie going to be as long in duration just like the amount of time it takes to play the board game? =P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AARON</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/11/sony-acquires-film-rights-to-risk#comment-230351</link>
		<dc:creator>AARON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 01:15:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=23017#comment-230351</guid>
		<description>Anyone else see this coming like 2 years ago?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone else see this coming like 2 years ago?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 420BAND</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/11/sony-acquires-film-rights-to-risk#comment-230328</link>
		<dc:creator>420BAND</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:40:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=23017#comment-230328</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m all for a &quot;TWISTER&quot; film with Kim Kardashian and Megan Foxx all oiled up and ready for a game vs. Angelina and that Leighton chick from Gossip Girl..
that I would pay 3-D dollars to see in Imax</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m all for a &#8220;TWISTER&#8221; film with Kim Kardashian and Megan Foxx all oiled up and ready for a game vs. Angelina and that Leighton chick from Gossip Girl..<br />
that I would pay 3-D dollars to see in Imax</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren J Seeley</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/11/sony-acquires-film-rights-to-risk#comment-230216</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren J Seeley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:39:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=23017#comment-230216</guid>
		<description>&quot;How Risk got made&quot; actually sounds more interesting if they treat it like a &#039;war strategy&#039; outline...combined with based on a true story. I think there&#039;s some possibilities there.

Anything else &lt;em&gt; is a waste of money, effort and time&lt;/em&gt;. A pattern is forming here: &quot;you (rival studio) have your board game to movie, I will have mine!&quot; and before long the only two board games left will be Scrabble and Sorry.

Look---Candyland and Chutes N Ladders, stuff like that, I can understand. Stuff like that could be a prod designer&#039;s pipe dream, and a fantasy world created and realized, family films and whatnot.  The &lt;em&gt;2210 A.D. version of Risk&lt;/em&gt; might fall into this area, but that&#039;s a stretch.

I don&#039;t see the movie &quot;Risk&quot; happening. It&#039;ll be in development, kick around here and there, but I predict that it will go nowhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;How Risk got made&#8221; actually sounds more interesting if they treat it like a &#8216;war strategy&#8217; outline&#8230;combined with based on a true story. I think there&#8217;s some possibilities there.</p>
<p>Anything else <em> is a waste of money, effort and time</em>. A pattern is forming here: &#8220;you (rival studio) have your board game to movie, I will have mine!&#8221; and before long the only two board games left will be Scrabble and Sorry.</p>
<p>Look&#8212;Candyland and Chutes N Ladders, stuff like that, I can understand. Stuff like that could be a prod designer&#8217;s pipe dream, and a fantasy world created and realized, family films and whatnot.  The <em>2210 A.D. version of Risk</em> might fall into this area, but that&#8217;s a stretch.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see the movie &#8220;Risk&#8221; happening. It&#8217;ll be in development, kick around here and there, but I predict that it will go nowhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

