<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Alice in Wonderland Poster now with 100% more Alice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2009/11/new-alice-in-wonderland-poster-now-with-100-more-alice/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/11/new-alice-in-wonderland-poster-now-with-100-more-alice</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:43:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/11/new-alice-in-wonderland-poster-now-with-100-more-alice#comment-231613</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 18:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=23177#comment-231613</guid>
		<description>Its not a &quot;point of view&quot;.  Its math.

Andrew, your first equation is accurate and calculated properly.

The second equation clearly adds a &quot;Multiply by 0&quot; to the equation to make it equal 0.

Its still math.  Its not adding 100% of zero.  Its adding 100% TO Zero.  

0 + (100%) = 1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its not a &#8220;point of view&#8221;.  Its math.</p>
<p>Andrew, your first equation is accurate and calculated properly.</p>
<p>The second equation clearly adds a &#8220;Multiply by 0&#8243; to the equation to make it equal 0.</p>
<p>Its still math.  Its not adding 100% of zero.  Its adding 100% TO Zero.  </p>
<p>0 + (100%) = 1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/11/new-alice-in-wonderland-poster-now-with-100-more-alice#comment-231557</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 03:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=23177#comment-231557</guid>
		<description>She looks like her head has been pasted onto a different body.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She looks like her head has been pasted onto a different body.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: makis</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/11/new-alice-in-wonderland-poster-now-with-100-more-alice#comment-231534</link>
		<dc:creator>makis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:25:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=23177#comment-231534</guid>
		<description>Tim Burton is making a new movie nothing else matters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim Burton is making a new movie nothing else matters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vic De Zen</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/11/new-alice-in-wonderland-poster-now-with-100-more-alice#comment-231443</link>
		<dc:creator>Vic De Zen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 21:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=23177#comment-231443</guid>
		<description>This movie in general seems to have such a creepy vibe to it. Not like what I grew up watching. It&#039;s going to be interesting to see in theatres.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This movie in general seems to have such a creepy vibe to it. Not like what I grew up watching. It&#8217;s going to be interesting to see in theatres.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meli</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/11/new-alice-in-wonderland-poster-now-with-100-more-alice#comment-231417</link>
		<dc:creator>meli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:20:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=23177#comment-231417</guid>
		<description>I love this poster right down to the faces in the roses.

Rodney - you really should check Mia out from her episodes of In Treatment she&#039;s quite the young actress.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this poster right down to the faces in the roses.</p>
<p>Rodney &#8211; you really should check Mia out from her episodes of In Treatment she&#8217;s quite the young actress.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew James</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/11/new-alice-in-wonderland-poster-now-with-100-more-alice#comment-231372</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=23177#comment-231372</guid>
		<description>Looks like it sort of depends upon your point of view:

http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1GGLS_enUS291US304&amp;aq=f&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=0+%2B+100%25+%3D

or

http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1GGLS_enUS291US304&amp;aq=f&amp;sourceid=chrome&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=0+%2B+100%25+(0)+%3D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like it sort of depends upon your point of view:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1GGLS_enUS291US304&#038;aq=f&#038;sourceid=chrome&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;q=0+%2B+100%25+%3D" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1GGLS_enUS291US304&#038;aq=f&#038;sourceid=chrome&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;q=0+%2B+100%25+%3D</a></p>
<p>or</p>
<p><a href="http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1GGLS_enUS291US304&#038;aq=f&#038;sourceid=chrome&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;q=0+%2B+100%25+(0)+%3D" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1GGLS_enUS291US304&#038;aq=f&#038;sourceid=chrome&#038;ie=UTF-8&#038;q=0+%2B+100%25+(0)+%3D</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew James</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/11/new-alice-in-wonderland-poster-now-with-100-more-alice#comment-231366</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:21:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=23177#comment-231366</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s that full magazine spread with both posters &quot;connected&quot;

http://www.slashfilm.com/wp/wp-content/images/alice_d23-550x392.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s that full magazine spread with both posters &#8220;connected&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.slashfilm.com/wp/wp-content/images/alice_d23-550x392.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.slashfilm.com/wp/wp-content/images/alice_d23-550&#215;392.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew James</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/11/new-alice-in-wonderland-poster-now-with-100-more-alice#comment-231364</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 17:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=23177#comment-231364</guid>
		<description>Lol.

But you didn&#039;t have ONE Alice.  You had ZERO Alice.  Adding 100% of zero to zero equals zero.

And even if you&#039;re right (which you&#039;re not).  If you had ONE Alice and 100% more, then you have TWO Alice.

So either way you&#039;re wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol.</p>
<p>But you didn&#8217;t have ONE Alice.  You had ZERO Alice.  Adding 100% of zero to zero equals zero.</p>
<p>And even if you&#8217;re right (which you&#8217;re not).  If you had ONE Alice and 100% more, then you have TWO Alice.</p>
<p>So either way you&#8217;re wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/11/new-alice-in-wonderland-poster-now-with-100-more-alice#comment-231353</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:56:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=23177#comment-231353</guid>
		<description>But the constant Alice is 1.  There is only one Alice.  If you add 100% of one Alice then you have One Alice.

You are just splitting hairs and still incorrect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the constant Alice is 1.  There is only one Alice.  If you add 100% of one Alice then you have One Alice.</p>
<p>You are just splitting hairs and still incorrect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew James</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/11/new-alice-in-wonderland-poster-now-with-100-more-alice#comment-231352</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 15:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=23177#comment-231352</guid>
		<description>I believe this poster is actually the left half of an entire spread in a magazine.  Take last week&#039;s poster and put it side by side with this one and they actually go together (I think).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe this poster is actually the left half of an entire spread in a magazine.  Take last week&#8217;s poster and put it side by side with this one and they actually go together (I think).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

