Comments on: Women in Trouble Poster Online

By: Gigan300

Gigan300 — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:34:15 +0000

True that.

By: SlashBeast

SlashBeast — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 14:29:43 +0000

Almost everything nowadays is about sexuality, it’s not lacking.

By: Ryan

Ryan — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:13:52 +0000

I think you guys are over reacting a little here. This seems like a film that could show a true, unfiltered look at human sexuality, which is kind of lacking these days. There aren’t alot of films that have a good blend of story and sex out there. Closer is about the only one that comes to mind. Judging by pretty good cast they have, this isn’t gonna be just some rom-com shitty flick that reels you in by the possibility of Emmanuelle Chriqui naked.

By: Corey

Corey — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 20:12:53 +0000

Connie Britton is so hot, I’m In!

By: James

James — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 18:34:52 +0000

Women watch porn too, and I think women watch movies for sexual attraction towards male actors more then dudes go to see movies because of hot actresses

Guys go watch movies because they want to see Ironman blast people. Not often do you hear “Hey lets watch Sex and the City, only because theyre hot”

Its always women watching Twilight, or Leonardo Dicaprio movies no matter how they feel to the movie itself. (Im not generalizing, im basing this off of male friends, family members, and female friends, family and ex girl friends…my own experience with people)

@ THOMAS
Everytime i post a comment on the movie blog I link my name directly to Asian Sauna Syrup Fudge Ass Porn, so click on my name and the link will directly take you to my porno site

By: Movie Enthusiast

Movie Enthusiast — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 12:55:20 +0000

that did not work with Lindsey Lohan or Jessica Biel.

By: Thomas

Thomas — Sat, 10 Oct 2009 10:09:26 +0000

Well, I think people (and with people I mean guys) will always pay money to see movies where already famous female movie stars appear nude or semi-nude. So if you have a movie with totally unknown actresses that is marketed with sex, then you’re right: that will fail. But if you market a film with the premise that, say, Nathalie Portman plays a stripper, then people will pay to see that movie. That’s my opinion anyway. And by the way James, could you please send me that link to the “Asian sauna syrup fudge ass porn”?

By: SlashBeast

SlashBeast — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:36:33 +0000

I agree. If you PAID MONEY to see a hot chick in theatres (even sadder, if she’s not even nude), then you need to discover the internet, or, get a girlfriend.

By: James

James — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:21:09 +0000

HBO you say?

See? We’re all treating it like a porn now. Thats exactly my point.

By: James

James — Fri, 09 Oct 2009 17:18:44 +0000

Upgrade? How so?

And all these fucking movies that market themselves by the “This is the closest thing to a porn” identity, will soon fail.

Teenagers have free tits online, we have HBO now, we dont have to go miles to scavenge for a glimpse of a bra strap like in the 70s, now we get Asian sauna syrup fudge ass porn with one click on the Google link.
Teenagers dont go to the movies anymore to see Showgirls” or “Kids” or “Basic Instinct” or get their oldest friends to grow beards so he can buy Playboy Mags.

I mean, if your movie IS a “porn” they should also have somehting else to it, like- dont just market the tits, but tell the audience “Hey, we have tits, but guess what…CHRISTOPHER NOLANS directing it! so the storys bound to be good”

You cant make money off of porn alone these days.

Or, thats what I think, at least.