<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pixar NOT Involved in Ant Man</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2009/09/pixar-not-involved-in-ant-man/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/09/pixar-not-involved-in-ant-man</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:43:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SlashBeast</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/09/pixar-not-involved-in-ant-man#comment-222612</link>
		<dc:creator>SlashBeast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=21803#comment-222612</guid>
		<description>Did anyone actually genuinely believe that Pixar was really going to make a Marvel film?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did anyone actually genuinely believe that Pixar was really going to make a Marvel film?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kanthan</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/09/pixar-not-involved-in-ant-man#comment-222611</link>
		<dc:creator>kanthan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 13:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=21803#comment-222611</guid>
		<description>Pixar are good at what they do, but please dont touch marvel.... please!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pixar are good at what they do, but please dont touch marvel&#8230;. please!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louis Plamondon</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/09/pixar-not-involved-in-ant-man#comment-222608</link>
		<dc:creator>Louis Plamondon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 11:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=21803#comment-222608</guid>
		<description>The only question worth asking ourselves regarding Pixar is how angry John will be if &#039;Up&#039; gets snubbed from the TEN Best Picture nominees at this year&#039;s Academy Awards, and whether we&#039;ll get to see a rant on a video blog!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only question worth asking ourselves regarding Pixar is how angry John will be if &#8216;Up&#8217; gets snubbed from the TEN Best Picture nominees at this year&#8217;s Academy Awards, and whether we&#8217;ll get to see a rant on a video blog!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TigerClaw</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/09/pixar-not-involved-in-ant-man#comment-222533</link>
		<dc:creator>TigerClaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=21803#comment-222533</guid>
		<description>I say that they can, It all depends on what would be suitable for adapting that Pixar could handle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say that they can, It all depends on what would be suitable for adapting that Pixar could handle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Stanley</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/09/pixar-not-involved-in-ant-man#comment-222508</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Stanley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 18:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=21803#comment-222508</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s no need for Pixar to adapt Marvel&#039;s properties to make films, its just not what they do. Disney has plenty of resources available to create an Ant Man film without the uses of Pixar. After all Bolt was a relative success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s no need for Pixar to adapt Marvel&#8217;s properties to make films, its just not what they do. Disney has plenty of resources available to create an Ant Man film without the uses of Pixar. After all Bolt was a relative success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TigerClaw</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/09/pixar-not-involved-in-ant-man#comment-222478</link>
		<dc:creator>TigerClaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=21803#comment-222478</guid>
		<description>Oh well, There are still other Marvel properties that Pixar could adapt that hasn&#039;t been adapted yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh well, There are still other Marvel properties that Pixar could adapt that hasn&#8217;t been adapted yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thematticus</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/09/pixar-not-involved-in-ant-man#comment-222459</link>
		<dc:creator>thematticus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=21803#comment-222459</guid>
		<description>Good to hear. I thinkan animated version would work (with obvious omitions) but the character is so complex and emotionally tormented, this is the way to go IMO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to hear. I thinkan animated version would work (with obvious omitions) but the character is so complex and emotionally tormented, this is the way to go IMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

