Which is the whole point for Bruno getting his own movie. He will get a different reaction out of people playing a flamboyant gay guy then he did playing an ignorant foreigner.

Using your example about the church/religious figure. While its the same idea basically. We will get a different experience from it. So while the premise is basically the same. We will get a different movie.

I think they’re advertising it as more of the same to piggy back on the success of Borat, but I don’t expect him to tread the same ground twice.

Further, I expect that this movie has the potential to really help the gay community. Sucker homophobes into the theatre with the promise of laughing at a flaming queer, and then make them sit through a scathing reprimand. After Bruno they’ll have a reference point, not for what gay people are like, but for how laughable and shitty homophobes are.

Shouldn’t you, therefore, reserve your judgment as well until you see the movie as “you should first see the movie and then judge on a trailer that maybe not even real parts of the movie.”

Honestly, though. I don’t think either of you are judging the movie. I think your just giving your opinions on how you felt after seeing the trailer. If they did not want people to form opinions prior to the movies release, then they would not show trailers for the movie. If John had been like, “Fuck this, this movie looks like shit and I’m not even going to waste my money to see it.” then maybe I could see your point. However, he openly says that how he felt after seeing the trailer could be totally opposite of how he will feel when he sees the movie. He is totally open that he is still planning on seeing it and is open to the possibility of his opinion being thwarted. A judgment, on the other hand, is final. Nothing final in what John said, accept on how the trailer made him feel.

Call me immoral, but I think it is ok to laugh at the willfully ignorant. Not only that, I am happy to do it for at least another 2 hours.