Comments on: Eli Roth Not Involved With Hostel 3

By: Ostelli Stockholm

Ostelli Stockholm — Thu, 20 Oct 2011 10:17:13 +0000

You actually make it seem really easy with your presentation but I find this topic to be really one thing which I believe I might by no means understand. It seems too complex and very extensive for me. I’m looking forward on your next submit, I?ll try to get the hang of it!

By: Susie

Susie — Wed, 13 Jan 2010 17:24:57 +0000

I agree with Chris. I really enjoyed the first and second, and see no need for a third unless someone can find something to actually ADD to the story. Yes, Eli is smart to cut ties. Will I watch a 3rd installment? Probably give it a half-hour look to see…

By: SlashBeast

SlashBeast — Mon, 27 Jul 2009 15:04:05 +0000

You mean your little world and all those people you know who love those movies who supposedly represent the entire movie-going population?

By: Ramsey

Ramsey — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:59:33 +0000

The first was good but I wasn’t wanting a second. Eli is smart to cut ties to a third.

By: Craig

Craig — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:21:02 +0000

I don’t blame him, he needs to get out of this series. The first one was cool, second was one of the worst movies ever.

By: THE FOOL ON THE HILL

THE FOOL ON THE HILL — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 06:42:24 +0000

There’s no need for a third one, actually, one was enough. Did it make any difference with Eli being involved in the second? It sucked anyway, maybe it would`ve been better if he wasn`t.

(Hostel 3 = Direct to VHS crap like Leperchaun 2,3,etc, Scream 2,3,etc.. I Know what you did Last… 2,3, etc.. all trash)

By: alfie

alfie — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 21:58:16 +0000

i like both of them but have no interest in a third one without roth

By: Ken

Ken — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 01:24:11 +0000

Movies like what hostel is turning out to be,are movies looking for new inventive ways of torture an killing,but leaving out smart characters.how many people aren’t noticing people missing,an how many times does every visitor stay around that one hotel.

By: Chris

Chris — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 18:22:33 +0000

Hostel I and II make a perfect story together, so there’s no need for a third. The first movie explored the story from the victims’ POV, while the second flipped it over and looked at how the business was run. (It even went so far as to have the heroine save herself via business transaction at the end.) The two together are a nice little package of human exploitation and a gory, fictionalized take-off on the horror of human trafficking and treating people as numbers and nothing more.

I liked them both. They’re funny and suspenseful and creepy. I don’t ever need to see a third one.

By: DG Music

DG Music — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 01:49:14 +0000

sounds like they’re pulling a ‘saw-franchise’ out of their ass…

In other words no.