<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sherlock Holmes Trailer Online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2009/05/sherlock-holmes-trailer-online/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/05/sherlock-holmes-trailer-online</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:43:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Girl</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/05/sherlock-holmes-trailer-online#comment-205977</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 06:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=19706#comment-205977</guid>
		<description>Good one!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Big Girl</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/05/sherlock-holmes-trailer-online#comment-205974</link>
		<dc:creator>Big Girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 06:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=19706#comment-205974</guid>
		<description>I totaly agree. However, I think that Wild Wild West had better performances. I don&#039;t get why everyone is so excited about this movie.  If you look past the fancy editing and explosions there isn&#039;t much there. I think it looks completely hokey and silly.  RDJ comes off as flat, a huge disappointment.  This could be a great movie, but RDJ was definitely miscast. The only thing that might save this movie is Jude Law. Although I wouldn&#039;t consider that to be an impartial comment.  In my opinion all Jude has to do to deliver a stellar performance is smile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totaly agree. However, I think that Wild Wild West had better performances. I don&#8217;t get why everyone is so excited about this movie.  If you look past the fancy editing and explosions there isn&#8217;t much there. I think it looks completely hokey and silly.  RDJ comes off as flat, a huge disappointment.  This could be a great movie, but RDJ was definitely miscast. The only thing that might save this movie is Jude Law. Although I wouldn&#8217;t consider that to be an impartial comment.  In my opinion all Jude has to do to deliver a stellar performance is smile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Persiflage</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/05/sherlock-holmes-trailer-online#comment-202007</link>
		<dc:creator>Persiflage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 16:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=19706#comment-202007</guid>
		<description>First of all, I&#039;m not sure there&#039;s any proof from the trailer that we&#039;ve got magic in this one.  (The girl floating upwards could have just been an rewinding time sort of shot.)

Second, I can&#039;t say they&#039;re necessarily changing Holmes&#039; personality from the trailer either.  Downey Jr. can play any personality he wants to, so I think he&#039;ll get Holmes&#039; brisk, logical, humorous personality down.  In the books, Haole, Holmes did fall for one woman actually, partly because she was the only person he&#039;d ever met who was ever able to outwit him - the character McAdams is playing.

And third, as a fanatical Sherlock Holmes fan, (I enjoyed the Basil Rathbone films.  Thought the Jeremy Brett Sherlock Holmes was by far the best ever done so far.  And HATED &#039;Young Sherlock Holmes&#039;, HATED Rupert Everett&#039;s attempt to be Holmes, and HATED James D&#039;Arcy&#039;s attempt to be Holmes.) - I think that this new Guy Ritchie&#039;s/Robert Downey Jr.&#039;s Sherlock Holmes looks absolutely awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, I&#8217;m not sure there&#8217;s any proof from the trailer that we&#8217;ve got magic in this one.  (The girl floating upwards could have just been an rewinding time sort of shot.)</p>
<p>Second, I can&#8217;t say they&#8217;re necessarily changing Holmes&#8217; personality from the trailer either.  Downey Jr. can play any personality he wants to, so I think he&#8217;ll get Holmes&#8217; brisk, logical, humorous personality down.  In the books, Haole, Holmes did fall for one woman actually, partly because she was the only person he&#8217;d ever met who was ever able to outwit him &#8211; the character McAdams is playing.</p>
<p>And third, as a fanatical Sherlock Holmes fan, (I enjoyed the Basil Rathbone films.  Thought the Jeremy Brett Sherlock Holmes was by far the best ever done so far.  And HATED &#8216;Young Sherlock Holmes&#8217;, HATED Rupert Everett&#8217;s attempt to be Holmes, and HATED James D&#8217;Arcy&#8217;s attempt to be Holmes.) &#8211; I think that this new Guy Ritchie&#8217;s/Robert Downey Jr.&#8217;s Sherlock Holmes looks absolutely awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: algoresnuts</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/05/sherlock-holmes-trailer-online#comment-201752</link>
		<dc:creator>algoresnuts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 19:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=19706#comment-201752</guid>
		<description>The only thing good about this trailer is Rachel McAdams. She is smokin&#039;!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only thing good about this trailer is Rachel McAdams. She is smokin&#8217;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Lopan</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/05/sherlock-holmes-trailer-online#comment-201648</link>
		<dc:creator>David Lopan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 13:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=19706#comment-201648</guid>
		<description>This looks fantastic. I&#039;m really excited to see this. I hope this becomes a blockbuster success. That way, he&#039;ll get more freedom to maybe continue the rocknrolla story a little more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks fantastic. I&#8217;m really excited to see this. I hope this becomes a blockbuster success. That way, he&#8217;ll get more freedom to maybe continue the rocknrolla story a little more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: free online hidden object games</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/05/sherlock-holmes-trailer-online#comment-201639</link>
		<dc:creator>free online hidden object games</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 11:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=19706#comment-201639</guid>
		<description>Looks good! nice choice of actors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks good! nice choice of actors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/05/sherlock-holmes-trailer-online#comment-201636</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 11:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=19706#comment-201636</guid>
		<description>Looks great (despite the fact that it&#039;s a literary disgrace, but when did that ever stop Hollywood?) Explosions, oversized hammers, Rachel McAdams... seems like New Holmes has got it all.

I wasn&#039;t expecting Downey Jr.&#039;s Gandalf impression, either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks great (despite the fact that it&#8217;s a literary disgrace, but when did that ever stop Hollywood?) Explosions, oversized hammers, Rachel McAdams&#8230; seems like New Holmes has got it all.</p>
<p>I wasn&#8217;t expecting Downey Jr.&#8217;s Gandalf impression, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AARON</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/05/sherlock-holmes-trailer-online#comment-201551</link>
		<dc:creator>AARON</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 02:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=19706#comment-201551</guid>
		<description>Actually he&#039;s pretty cool</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually he&#8217;s pretty cool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Film Yap</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/05/sherlock-holmes-trailer-online#comment-201544</link>
		<dc:creator>The Film Yap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 01:50:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=19706#comment-201544</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t sold either way. Looks fun and witty, but also plenty of room to fall flat on its face. Is that some sort of vampire plot?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t sold either way. Looks fun and witty, but also plenty of room to fall flat on its face. Is that some sort of vampire plot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 3R!C</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/05/sherlock-holmes-trailer-online#comment-201543</link>
		<dc:creator>3R!C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 01:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=19706#comment-201543</guid>
		<description>Somebody is obviously obsessed with this website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somebody is obviously obsessed with this website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

