<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MPAA rates Bruno an NC-17</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2009/03/mpaa-rates-bruno-an-nc-17/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/03/mpaa-rates-bruno-an-nc-17</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:43:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eli Nassau</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/03/mpaa-rates-bruno-an-nc-17#comment-193522</link>
		<dc:creator>Eli Nassau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 14:36:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=18341#comment-193522</guid>
		<description>Sacha Baron Cohen is able to surprise the audience again, except this time he did it with a gay character instead of an eastern European reporter. Interestingly enough, in Borat, the movie, there are plenty of homosexual remarks, not to mention the nude wrestling scene between Borat and his overweight manager. Why is it then that one movie gets rated NC-17 and the other R? It&#039;s the gay thing, I think. If it wasn&#039;t for Bruno being gay, I believe the MPAA would not have given this movie this rating. As long as the character is not openly gay (like Borat), then there is no problem but as soon as this character blatantly says he is gay, then the MPAA gets all worried.

You can tell this movie has a &quot;hidden brilliance&quot; already by the way it is marketed. The executives will surely use this rating as a marketing tool, but this rating also proves the point that the movie is trying to make, which is similar to the one in Borat: America needs to reflect upon what it says about freedom, and see if it actually means what it says, particularly in conservative states like Texas (where the movie was shot).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sacha Baron Cohen is able to surprise the audience again, except this time he did it with a gay character instead of an eastern European reporter. Interestingly enough, in Borat, the movie, there are plenty of homosexual remarks, not to mention the nude wrestling scene between Borat and his overweight manager. Why is it then that one movie gets rated NC-17 and the other R? It&#8217;s the gay thing, I think. If it wasn&#8217;t for Bruno being gay, I believe the MPAA would not have given this movie this rating. As long as the character is not openly gay (like Borat), then there is no problem but as soon as this character blatantly says he is gay, then the MPAA gets all worried.</p>
<p>You can tell this movie has a &#8220;hidden brilliance&#8221; already by the way it is marketed. The executives will surely use this rating as a marketing tool, but this rating also proves the point that the movie is trying to make, which is similar to the one in Borat: America needs to reflect upon what it says about freedom, and see if it actually means what it says, particularly in conservative states like Texas (where the movie was shot).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dragonslayer</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/03/mpaa-rates-bruno-an-nc-17#comment-192887</link>
		<dc:creator>Dragonslayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 10:26:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=18341#comment-192887</guid>
		<description>Watchmen falls under it was fucking awesome and Bruno will suck</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watchmen falls under it was fucking awesome and Bruno will suck</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bernardg</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/03/mpaa-rates-bruno-an-nc-17#comment-192881</link>
		<dc:creator>bernardg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 10:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=18341#comment-192881</guid>
		<description>only in america, excessive violence is a-okay, sex and nudity is bad..... makes me wonder, where is the wathcmen fall into these? They do have both violence and nudity abound....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>only in america, excessive violence is a-okay, sex and nudity is bad&#8230;.. makes me wonder, where is the wathcmen fall into these? They do have both violence and nudity abound&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dragonslayer</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/03/mpaa-rates-bruno-an-nc-17#comment-192660</link>
		<dc:creator>Dragonslayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 19:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=18341#comment-192660</guid>
		<description>I won&#039;t see it anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t see it anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/03/mpaa-rates-bruno-an-nc-17#comment-192549</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 10:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=18341#comment-192549</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see what the problem with NC-17 is, plenty of films in the UK are rated 18 meaning you have to be 18 and over, most of my favourite ones...for example:

Training Day
American Gangster
Taxi Driver
Pulp Fiction
Eastern Promises
Man on Fire 
The Departed
Requiem for a Dream
Magnolia
The Big Lebowski

....i could write this list all day.

Also it means the cinema wont be full of t**ts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see what the problem with NC-17 is, plenty of films in the UK are rated 18 meaning you have to be 18 and over, most of my favourite ones&#8230;for example:</p>
<p>Training Day<br />
American Gangster<br />
Taxi Driver<br />
Pulp Fiction<br />
Eastern Promises<br />
Man on Fire<br />
The Departed<br />
Requiem for a Dream<br />
Magnolia<br />
The Big Lebowski</p>
<p>&#8230;.i could write this list all day.</p>
<p>Also it means the cinema wont be full of t**ts</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AndyS</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/03/mpaa-rates-bruno-an-nc-17#comment-192539</link>
		<dc:creator>AndyS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 07:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=18341#comment-192539</guid>
		<description>Actually the MPAA is a joke.  A movie like the HillsHaveEyes can get an R rating but if a movie has too much penis and sex scenes it gets an NC17.  The fact that Zack and Miri went thru extended cuts while Hostel didn&#039;t is idiotic.  Only America where Violence is okay but penis and vagina are horrible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the MPAA is a joke.  A movie like the HillsHaveEyes can get an R rating but if a movie has too much penis and sex scenes it gets an NC17.  The fact that Zack and Miri went thru extended cuts while Hostel didn&#8217;t is idiotic.  Only America where Violence is okay but penis and vagina are horrible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Devan Price</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/03/mpaa-rates-bruno-an-nc-17#comment-192416</link>
		<dc:creator>Devan Price</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=18341#comment-192416</guid>
		<description>Watchmen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watchmen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/03/mpaa-rates-bruno-an-nc-17#comment-192335</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 02:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=18341#comment-192335</guid>
		<description>It doesn&#039;t FORCE anything.  They could accept that with the content they have it qualifies them for a certain rating and live with it. 

They want to broaden their market and make it less restrictive, then they can make changes.  

They just use a rating system for informing people of what they might face if they attend the movie.  They don&#039;t MAKE anyone do anything.

If they wanted to keep the movie AS IS, they could release it NC-17. 

If anything the MPAA makes it better for the movie so that they can release an &quot;unrated&quot; dvd.  So they can double dip on the version that they put out to appeal to the masses, and the version they sell you AGAIN with the content they left out that would have been inappropriate for the younger audiences.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t FORCE anything.  They could accept that with the content they have it qualifies them for a certain rating and live with it. </p>
<p>They want to broaden their market and make it less restrictive, then they can make changes.  </p>
<p>They just use a rating system for informing people of what they might face if they attend the movie.  They don&#8217;t MAKE anyone do anything.</p>
<p>If they wanted to keep the movie AS IS, they could release it NC-17. </p>
<p>If anything the MPAA makes it better for the movie so that they can release an &#8220;unrated&#8221; dvd.  So they can double dip on the version that they put out to appeal to the masses, and the version they sell you AGAIN with the content they left out that would have been inappropriate for the younger audiences.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MEDavidson</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/03/mpaa-rates-bruno-an-nc-17#comment-192333</link>
		<dc:creator>MEDavidson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 01:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=18341#comment-192333</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a MARKETING PLOY. Of course it wont be NC-17 when it comes out. Everyone knows that. It&#039;s months and months and months away and the studio leaks this shit just to raise awareness and get people talking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a MARKETING PLOY. Of course it wont be NC-17 when it comes out. Everyone knows that. It&#8217;s months and months and months away and the studio leaks this shit just to raise awareness and get people talking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chris....the real one</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/03/mpaa-rates-bruno-an-nc-17#comment-192324</link>
		<dc:creator>chris....the real one</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 00:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=18341#comment-192324</guid>
		<description>great movie...showed how much the mpaa is full of shit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great movie&#8230;showed how much the mpaa is full of shit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

