<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Is No One Accusing SAG Of Snubbing The Dark Knight?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2009/01/why-is-no-one-accusing-sag-of-snubbing-the-dark-knight/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/01/why-is-no-one-accusing-sag-of-snubbing-the-dark-knight</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:43:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristopher Tapley</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/01/why-is-no-one-accusing-sag-of-snubbing-the-dark-knight#comment-182243</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristopher Tapley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=17092#comment-182243</guid>
		<description>Tim: Neuter yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim: Neuter yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/01/why-is-no-one-accusing-sag-of-snubbing-the-dark-knight#comment-182014</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 07:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=17092#comment-182014</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m 104% right, The Dark Knight was carried by Heath Ledger&#039;s performance, nothing more. If he wasn&#039;t in that movie the Dark Knight would&#039;ve been awful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m 104% right, The Dark Knight was carried by Heath Ledger&#8217;s performance, nothing more. If he wasn&#8217;t in that movie the Dark Knight would&#8217;ve been awful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bjon86</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/01/why-is-no-one-accusing-sag-of-snubbing-the-dark-knight#comment-181931</link>
		<dc:creator>bjon86</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 18:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=17092#comment-181931</guid>
		<description>uh...John...dude....you have had Wale as your number 1 on a couple lists...uuuh...but you wouldn&#039;t even put TDK in your top five? Sounds like a personal issue. Something is seriously &quot;koo koo&quot; in that head of yours.

Like....get off of the Wale cock for two seconds, wipe the robo skeet from your eyes and feast them upon a bigger and brighter world of seriously upper-echelon films like The Dark Knight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uh&#8230;John&#8230;dude&#8230;.you have had Wale as your number 1 on a couple lists&#8230;uuuh&#8230;but you wouldn&#8217;t even put TDK in your top five? Sounds like a personal issue. Something is seriously &#8220;koo koo&#8221; in that head of yours.</p>
<p>Like&#8230;.get off of the Wale cock for two seconds, wipe the robo skeet from your eyes and feast them upon a bigger and brighter world of seriously upper-echelon films like The Dark Knight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/01/why-is-no-one-accusing-sag-of-snubbing-the-dark-knight#comment-181929</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=17092#comment-181929</guid>
		<description>people still watch American Idol?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>people still watch American Idol?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/01/why-is-no-one-accusing-sag-of-snubbing-the-dark-knight#comment-181927</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:49:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=17092#comment-181927</guid>
		<description>but she got blown up, that scene alone should have gained an oscar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but she got blown up, that scene alone should have gained an oscar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristopher Tapley</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/01/why-is-no-one-accusing-sag-of-snubbing-the-dark-knight#comment-181869</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristopher Tapley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=17092#comment-181869</guid>
		<description>Others?  Tell that to the legions of guild members who voted for it throughout the precursor season and the critics that chimed in, making it one of the two most critically acclaimed films of 2008.

100 infinity %.  And I&#039;m fucking your girlfriend.

Check mate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Others?  Tell that to the legions of guild members who voted for it throughout the precursor season and the critics that chimed in, making it one of the two most critically acclaimed films of 2008.</p>
<p>100 infinity %.  And I&#8217;m fucking your girlfriend.</p>
<p>Check mate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/01/why-is-no-one-accusing-sag-of-snubbing-the-dark-knight#comment-181862</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 06:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=17092#comment-181862</guid>
		<description>Silly silly Tapley,

I know it&#039;s fun seeing conspiracy theories behind every tree when things don&#039;t go the way you think they should... but reality isn&#039;t as convenient.

I know The Dark Knight wasn&#039;t one of the 5 best of the year... so maybe... just maybe, others thought the same without the conspiracy.

I&#039;m 102% right... and I&#039;m rubbing my ball sack on your blu ray collection.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silly silly Tapley,</p>
<p>I know it&#8217;s fun seeing conspiracy theories behind every tree when things don&#8217;t go the way you think they should&#8230; but reality isn&#8217;t as convenient.</p>
<p>I know The Dark Knight wasn&#8217;t one of the 5 best of the year&#8230; so maybe&#8230; just maybe, others thought the same without the conspiracy.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m 102% right&#8230; and I&#8217;m rubbing my ball sack on your blu ray collection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristopher Tapley</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/01/why-is-no-one-accusing-sag-of-snubbing-the-dark-knight#comment-181843</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristopher Tapley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=17092#comment-181843</guid>
		<description>By the way, if you still contend that the Academy has no prejudice against comic book movies (given the tone of your last statement in the post), well, &quot;deluded&quot; ain&#039;t the half of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, if you still contend that the Academy has no prejudice against comic book movies (given the tone of your last statement in the post), well, &#8220;deluded&#8221; ain&#8217;t the half of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristopher Tapley</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/01/why-is-no-one-accusing-sag-of-snubbing-the-dark-knight#comment-181842</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristopher Tapley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 02:10:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=17092#comment-181842</guid>
		<description>An Oscar nomination for Best Pic is a lot different than perpetuating the myth that the SAG ensemble award is the guild&#039;s equivalent of Best Pic.  So snub vs. snub doesn&#039;t really compute here, John.

Man, sometimes it takes me all day to explain the ins and outs of awards season to you.  But I&#039;ve been knee deep in this mess for nearly a decade now and you haven&#039;t, so, you&#039;re forgiven.

That said, I never once said the Academy &quot;didn&#039;t snub it because it was nominated in eight categories.&quot;  I said it was nominated in eight categories and you made a quip, &quot;Jeez, that&#039;s not snubbing it.&quot;

Sorry to go into the specifics of a personal conversation and bore your readers, but somebody&#039;s gotta tell the truth &#039;round here.

I&#039;m 101% correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An Oscar nomination for Best Pic is a lot different than perpetuating the myth that the SAG ensemble award is the guild&#8217;s equivalent of Best Pic.  So snub vs. snub doesn&#8217;t really compute here, John.</p>
<p>Man, sometimes it takes me all day to explain the ins and outs of awards season to you.  But I&#8217;ve been knee deep in this mess for nearly a decade now and you haven&#8217;t, so, you&#8217;re forgiven.</p>
<p>That said, I never once said the Academy &#8220;didn&#8217;t snub it because it was nominated in eight categories.&#8221;  I said it was nominated in eight categories and you made a quip, &#8220;Jeez, that&#8217;s not snubbing it.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sorry to go into the specifics of a personal conversation and bore your readers, but somebody&#8217;s gotta tell the truth &#8217;round here.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m 101% correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2009/01/why-is-no-one-accusing-sag-of-snubbing-the-dark-knight#comment-181806</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=17092#comment-181806</guid>
		<description>Oh poor deluded Tapley,

First of all, I was not &quot;Bat bashing&quot;.  I said in my post that I thought it deserved the SAG nomination for the top award.

You&#039;re also flip flopping on your arguments.  You just said:

&lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;&quot;SAG did NOT snub the film. Wouldn’t you know it, it was the only contender to walk away with two trophies.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;

You&#039;re the same guy who when I tried to point out that the Oscars didn&#039;t &quot;snub&quot; TDK because they had EIGHT Oscar nominations... you said it didn&#039;t matter because they weren&#039;t the big one.

Well which is it.  Do the &quot;other&quot; nominations count or don&#039;t they?

I&#039;m 100% correct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh poor deluded Tapley,</p>
<p>First of all, I was not &#8220;Bat bashing&#8221;.  I said in my post that I thought it deserved the SAG nomination for the top award.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re also flip flopping on your arguments.  You just said:</p>
<p><b><i>&#8220;SAG did NOT snub the film. Wouldn’t you know it, it was the only contender to walk away with two trophies.&#8221;</i></b></p>
<p>You&#8217;re the same guy who when I tried to point out that the Oscars didn&#8217;t &#8220;snub&#8221; TDK because they had EIGHT Oscar nominations&#8230; you said it didn&#8217;t matter because they weren&#8217;t the big one.</p>
<p>Well which is it.  Do the &#8220;other&#8221; nominations count or don&#8217;t they?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m 100% correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

