Your IP is logged every time you post. So all those comments of you calling me names? Deleted. As well as the ones where you pretend to be someone else endorsing the film.

I have nothing against the film, so trying to litter the comment section here with “This film will be great” posts pretending to be 5 different posters all within 10 minutes isn’t fooling anyone.

Please stop. You are accomplishing nothing.

He went on faith that proper confirmation was not required and got burned for it. When he got there, even with his proof that he felt was sufficient he was still denied. Sucks really. I sympathize with him.

But from Bret’s side, he did the right thing. Sinnott even admits that afterward they made efforts to remedy the situation and he told them to shove it up their ass.

Sinnott had already shown that he was unwilling to co-operate and remedy the situation so no degree of concession was going to make him happy so they might have just decided to ignore him.

This is not about Bret being a man or attacking his character. It was a bad situation and Sinnott having some sort of breakdown over it showed him in a poor light.

I don’t think they needed to make a public statement that a situation went bad because of poor planning and poor communication. It really wasn’t the end of the world. I don’t think they look bad not doing it considering they made a few attempts to reschedule a proper meeting for an interview and were rudely declined as Sinnott so graphically describes.

@Dr Pepper, I already addressed all the issues you brought up REPEATEDLY. Your attempts to drag this into some troll war while you attack my character are irrelevant. Your post was deleted for that. As will any further attempts to do the same will be removed. No post was ever deleted simply for disagreeing with me. However creating your own personal vendetta against me is pointless and contributes nothing to the discussion.

Please save your efforts. I know you already have a scathing retort to offer claiming my deleting your attempts to troll and avoid the issue at hand. If you cannot address the topic, don’t comment here.

@Dr Pepper, you keep making this about your perception of my article. I wrote about his reaction. So I only included information about his reaction. I have said this again and again to you. I wont repeat this simple fact any longer. You keep trying to discredit my opinon on his unprofessional rant he calls a press release by saying I didnt include enough information? Sorry. No more info was needed. Want to know more? Follow the link to his myspace page I listed in the article.

As for “all those people who stopped reading the site” none of them were regular readers. They were all from the incredibly biased and clouded facebook group. I don’t lose sleep over trolls who want to tell me they are leaving the site when they were not readers to begin with.

You guys can rant all you want. Until you address the topic presented in the article I wrote, you are just trolling for a fight I wont give you.

I have also stated that Sinnott was completely in his right to be upset about it. But that still doesn’t make it professional to rant like he did.

We don’t know that Bret DIDNT ask his manager to state anything. Sinnott himself admitted that they tried a few times to arrange another meeting which Sinnott told them to “shove up their ass”

Are you surprised that his calloused reaction to their attempts to remedy the bad circumstance are “shoved up their ass” would make them less concerned about a statement?

He challenged Bret with the emails. Its the english language. For someone who claims to have a firm grasp on it criticizing my grammar you seem to let the definition of words elude you. Bret said he didnt hear anything about an interview and Sinnott tried to prove it. That is a challenge. One statement is challenged by evidence. Just because he didn’t shove it down his throat or come over the table doesn’t mean the issue wasn’t challenged.

You are splitting hairs and failing. Please save your efforts for the facebook group where a member of Sinnott’s staff is paid to be biased.

@Dr Pepper

Objective? I was objective. I commented ONLY on his reaction. I have to repeat that over and over for you? REACTION. With me yet?

There is no difference between the timeline and his personal reaction. The article is ABOUT the reaction.

I said he is 22 because all the googling in the world managed to come up with that information about him. Otherwise this established and accomplished professional doesn’t exist. You have a source that says he isn’t?

Because he did a few blog vids for Mariah Carey and this project. Nothing else. That’s inexperienced. Painting one house doesn’t make you a painter.

You might want to read my article again Pepper, as I clearly state that he has “managed to secure select moments with some of the industry’s more notable stars” So that wasn’t detailed enough for you?

Again, you choose to attack my character while stumbling over assumptions about “my writing”. And the article is biased because it is MY OPINION about Sinnott’s rant. If you bothered to read the article to begin with you would see that was precisely what I was writing about. Nothing more.

No agenda, no other purpose. I thought Sinnott reacted unprofessionally. I sympathize with his situation and totally understand him FEELING that way, but the public statement was unpforessional.

If you wish to discuss THAT further, I am willing to listen. However, if you (and others) wish to just attack my character while avoiding the topic at hand, I have no time for you.

The information I did include in my post was about Sinnott’s reaction. I have to repeat this again and again. This is not about Bret, its not about his management, its not about the movie. Its about Sinnott’s reaction to the already bad situation.

@RFVideo, All I have to go on is Sinnott’s rant, which is what the article was about. And he DID challenge Bret with the printed emails. He says so in his rant. Bret said he knew nothing of the arrangements and Sinnott says he presented Bret with printouts of all the emails he exchanged with his manager.

@Lauren, yes I am a fan. I am a blogger, and I am writing IN the industry. You attempt to discredit our years of press passes, advanced press only screenings and set visits? You might want to read this site a little more. We have a lot more inside access than the standard blogger ranting from his basement. Makes me laugh when people like you come to troll when you just want to attack my character instead of the topic at hand.

You want to mock the hours I spend writing for this site, but it is my job to do so. Do I mock all the time you spend at your job?

And what have I cited without a source? Everything I have said came right from Sinnott’s rant and his page.

Sinnott said very specifically in his rant that he confronted Bret about the plans he presumed were set (without a signed contract from the talent or his management) and even said he challenged Bret with copies of the emails he exchanged with his management. When Bret coudn’t confirm any of it he declined the interview. Sinnott pressed the issue, which by the tone of his rant I can only assume was performed with the utmost professionalism, to which Bret replied “Not my problem” and left.

Bad situation, but Bret couldn’t confirm, so he declined. Not saying Sinnott didn’t have the right to be upset, but this wasn’t Bret’s fault. This was between Sinnott and Bret’s management.

If someone is going to comment that Bret is an asshole in this situation (as opposed to Sinnott’s reactionary behaviour – which was the topic at hand) then you might want to back it up. I didn’t see Bret doing anything other than what a celebrity should do in a situation just like this.

It was Bret’s management that made this into a bad situation. Bret was just in the middle of it. I am sure the frustrated and upset Sinnott was just as blunt as his recollection of Bret’s reaction to his insistent demands that he do the interview anyways.

No celebrity is going to offer an on camera interview without their manager’s approval. So Bret put his foot down? Good for him. His manager was a jerk and dropped the ball on their arrangements. Not good.