<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Paramount Delays the Soloist and Defiance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2008/10/paramount-delays-the-soloist-and-defiance/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/10/paramount-delays-the-soloist-and-defiance</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:43:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dragonslayer</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/10/paramount-delays-the-soloist-and-defiance#comment-168688</link>
		<dc:creator>Dragonslayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 15:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=15030#comment-168688</guid>
		<description>Defiance looked great. What is with all these deaths, push-backs, and other bullcrap happening in 2008?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Defiance looked great. What is with all these deaths, push-backs, and other bullcrap happening in 2008?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristina</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/10/paramount-delays-the-soloist-and-defiance#comment-167728</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 03:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=15030#comment-167728</guid>
		<description>Sorry, but The Soloist looks corny as all get out.  Perhaps they moved it because the studio doesn&#039;t think that the film is all that good.  Maybe they are bummed that the trailer hasn&#039;t gotten much of a reaction from folks.  But it&#039;s dumb to slam the brakes on the Downey Express.  They could have capitalized on the goodwill that this guy has garnered this year and had a &quot;Pursuit of Happyness&quot;-style hit on their hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, but The Soloist looks corny as all get out.  Perhaps they moved it because the studio doesn&#8217;t think that the film is all that good.  Maybe they are bummed that the trailer hasn&#8217;t gotten much of a reaction from folks.  But it&#8217;s dumb to slam the brakes on the Downey Express.  They could have capitalized on the goodwill that this guy has garnered this year and had a &#8220;Pursuit of Happyness&#8221;-style hit on their hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ADOX</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/10/paramount-delays-the-soloist-and-defiance#comment-167511</link>
		<dc:creator>ADOX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 22:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=15030#comment-167511</guid>
		<description>sucks im lookin forward to the soloist, like it when

FOXX IS ACTUALLY SERIOUS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sucks im lookin forward to the soloist, like it when</p>
<p>FOXX IS ACTUALLY SERIOUS</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darren J Seeley</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/10/paramount-delays-the-soloist-and-defiance#comment-167474</link>
		<dc:creator>Darren J Seeley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:50:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=15030#comment-167474</guid>
		<description>I am disappointed. 

In fact, I...am...really, really angry.

The Soloist does look like it was meant for Oscar talk, and if not that, I would think they would have the guts to release Defiance and give Daniel Craig a possible shot at best actor. My only thoughts on the latter was Craig&#039;s 007 film would have been released a month prior, and its a WWII action drama competing with Valkyire. That&#039;s an estimated guess.

But Soloist...is there a chance Robert Downey Jr might get nom&#039;d for his other roles through the past year? Iron Man might be a longshot, but I can totally buy a supporting actor in Tropic Thunder (or even Charlie Bartlett).

I don&#039;t like it when studios shuffle release dates too much. The films themselves may be fine but if nobody can find them, nobody will see them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am disappointed. </p>
<p>In fact, I&#8230;am&#8230;really, really angry.</p>
<p>The Soloist does look like it was meant for Oscar talk, and if not that, I would think they would have the guts to release Defiance and give Daniel Craig a possible shot at best actor. My only thoughts on the latter was Craig&#8217;s 007 film would have been released a month prior, and its a WWII action drama competing with Valkyire. That&#8217;s an estimated guess.</p>
<p>But Soloist&#8230;is there a chance Robert Downey Jr might get nom&#8217;d for his other roles through the past year? Iron Man might be a longshot, but I can totally buy a supporting actor in Tropic Thunder (or even Charlie Bartlett).</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like it when studios shuffle release dates too much. The films themselves may be fine but if nobody can find them, nobody will see them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Jim Walker</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/10/paramount-delays-the-soloist-and-defiance#comment-167361</link>
		<dc:creator>The Jim Walker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/?p=15030#comment-167361</guid>
		<description>I think the writers strike had a bigger impact on them than they would like to admit.  After the strike had ended, I remember a few sources saying that 2008 would be fine for movies because they were already under production, but summer 2009 and Holiday 2009 could be hit hard.  I think these studios are realizing that now.

So, they can &quot;fast track&quot; a few flicks for Holiday 2009.  And as far as Summer 2009, they simply &quot;move&quot; the bigger films from Holiday 2008.  Movies get delayed all the time, so i guess they figure if you have interest, you will see it whenever it comes out.

TO be honest, that works with most people.  I am a HUGE movie guy and follow release dates with anticipation, but i have found out that most people DO NOT.  I have been at work and have said to some coworkers &quot;Wow that new James Bond flick looks awesome.&quot;   and i get responses like &quot;Yeah, i havent seen that yet.&quot; (((When it isnt even out for 2 months))) and &quot;I know... that comes out next summer right?&quot;  (((And i am like... um... no, next month.)))

So it seems as much as I care, many other people dont.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the writers strike had a bigger impact on them than they would like to admit.  After the strike had ended, I remember a few sources saying that 2008 would be fine for movies because they were already under production, but summer 2009 and Holiday 2009 could be hit hard.  I think these studios are realizing that now.</p>
<p>So, they can &#8220;fast track&#8221; a few flicks for Holiday 2009.  And as far as Summer 2009, they simply &#8220;move&#8221; the bigger films from Holiday 2008.  Movies get delayed all the time, so i guess they figure if you have interest, you will see it whenever it comes out.</p>
<p>TO be honest, that works with most people.  I am a HUGE movie guy and follow release dates with anticipation, but i have found out that most people DO NOT.  I have been at work and have said to some coworkers &#8220;Wow that new James Bond flick looks awesome.&#8221;   and i get responses like &#8220;Yeah, i havent seen that yet.&#8221; (((When it isnt even out for 2 months))) and &#8220;I know&#8230; that comes out next summer right?&#8221;  (((And i am like&#8230; um&#8230; no, next month.)))</p>
<p>So it seems as much as I care, many other people dont.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

