Comments on: Justice League is Back On Again

By: Ransom Betty

Ransom Betty — Fri, 08 Aug 2008 20:40:19 +0000

Don’t get your panties in a bunch over JLA. Chances are very good this thing will be in development hell for 15 years before it ever gets real close to becoming a reality. If WB can’t even get another SUPERMAN movie off the ground: JLA has no chance whatsoever!

By: Rodney

Rodney — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 02:26:26 +0000

I will form an opinion of the whole movie once it comes out (if that ever happens… this is the third time they said justice league is back on)

But so far they havent given us much to look forward to. They have stopped and started this project 3 times already with no script.

By: George

George — Thu, 07 Aug 2008 01:05:20 +0000

Actually there is only one franchise that is being ignored and thats Batman.

Singer/Routh Superman franchise is dead. Does anyone really believe that there is going to be another one?? Come on. Its dead. Done for. Finished.

Personally I wait until I see some actual footage before I write off a project completely.

I will at least let them begin to film some footage before I jump up and down about second hand info I got off the internet.

By: Rodney

Rodney — Wed, 06 Aug 2008 22:03:57 +0000

@FinalJoe, why the hell would you want Manuela Arcuri as Wonder Woman? She has never been in anything that even has her speaking ENGLISH.

Sure, shes pretty, but that’s all shes got going for her.

By: finaljoe

finaljoe — Wed, 06 Aug 2008 19:28:14 +0000

Manuela Arcuri for Wonder Women. If not there’s no point.

By: DeAnte T. Goodloe

DeAnte T. Goodloe — Wed, 06 Aug 2008 13:20:30 +0000

A respectfully made GREEN LANTERN movie could rival IRON MAN.

Tons of potential with that character.

By: James Ty III

James Ty III — Wed, 06 Aug 2008 10:10:18 +0000

Instead of a Justice League movie, why not Warner Bros. produce a Batman and Superman movie with Christian Bale and Brandon Routh playing their respective roles? This would be a better alternative.

By: 790

790 — Wed, 06 Aug 2008 05:59:37 +0000

Like a bad hangover.

By: Rodney

Rodney — Wed, 06 Aug 2008 03:49:17 +0000

@Shane – “you don’t always have to see the entire film to be able to pass some sort of judgment on it”

So if I refuse to read any more of your comment I should be qualified to pass judgment on your viewpoint?

You are wrong. You do have to see a whole movie to pass judgment on it. Then you are fully qualified to form an opinion. Otherwise you are forming an opinion on a scene (still valid) but then assuming everything else in that film will be the same quality as that scene.

I saw a woman storm out of Moulin Rouge because she refused to watch a movie about a hooker.

Also, keep in mind that the current feelings about this movie are based entirely on what we already know. Admittedly it is little, but with a poor foundation, you just can’t get excited about the movie.

This could end up great, but it could cure cancer too. Same odds.

By: Shane

Shane — Wed, 06 Aug 2008 03:36:34 +0000

George, you don’t always have to see the entire film to be able to pass some sort of judgment on it. Opinions on how stupid the concept, casting, etc of a film are, before it’s made are no more valid as an opinion of a completed film. They’re still just opinions. Do we need to see an entire completed film before deciding it has a stupid concept? Or can that be deduced from reading what the concept is?

As fans of the franchises involved, why should we wait until we see a trailer to voice objection at how this will be handled? Isn’t it better that the studio possibly find out fan objections before committing to a project?

This could end up being great. A JL film like most are proposing (with continuity based on other films), could end up being terrible. There’s always a lot of variable with any film. But at this point, all we’re discussing is what people want to see. And a lot of people think this is a bad idea.