Comments on: President Tom Cruise In 28th Amendment

By: Rodney

Rodney — Sat, 24 Jul 2010 20:43:47 +0000

Aside from the fact that this was written over 2 years ago, right now Tom doesn’t need any help with his career.

Even with the residue of crazy still on him, he is doing fine.

By: Daniel

Daniel — Sat, 24 Jul 2010 20:40:42 +0000

I can understand Cruise wanting to team with Washington, for “Matarese Circle”. Tom needs all the help he can get to revitalize his flagging career, and he couldn’t do much better than to work opposite a true superstar like Washington who never misses. But this project sounds more like Denzel coming in to support Cruise, and that’s a mistake for Denzel’s career. I wouldn’t think anyone would want their career tainted by Tom at this point, so I hope this isn’t 28th Amendment thing doesn’t really happen…

By: Steve (noles)

Steve (noles) — Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:57:16 +0000

it’s a good thing you “small a flop”. Spell check? Did anyone see Letterman joke on this last night?

By: Hamster

Hamster — Sun, 01 Feb 2009 16:31:11 +0000

Apparently Cruise is dropping out of this project and Christian Bale is in the running to take over for him.Personally i would rather see Bale in the role rather than Cruise,not cos i don’t like Cruise but cos i think that Bale might pull it off better.

By: hollywood

hollywood — Sun, 28 Dec 2008 20:32:18 +0000

from what i hear about this movie is that cruise quit the role as the president!!!!

By: L Ron Hubbard

L Ron Hubbard — Tue, 20 May 2008 18:32:40 +0000

If he becomes president, America will crash and burn scamming itself to death.

By: grendel25

grendel25 — Sat, 17 May 2008 02:31:29 +0000

John,

I’m not ignoring the fact that he made only two films since his meltdown. I just don’t consider them to be enough in the equation that you are already saying that this smells like a flop. I understand that Mission 3 was not up to par of what the studio wanted monetary wise, but it did make almost $400 mil worldwide, and I don’t really consider “Lions for Lambs” because no one wants to see movies about the middle east right now.

I’m just wondering what would you think of the film if you had just heard the synopsis and not who is starring in it.

By: 46and2

46and2 — Fri, 16 May 2008 18:47:26 +0000

CHRIS beat me to the punch with the exact same thought, so I’ll just say I threw up a little in my mouth when I read this post.

By: John

John — Fri, 16 May 2008 14:06:26 +0000

Hey Grendel25

You’re ignoring the fact that he has only had 2 films since his public melt down. MI 3 made money, but it made almost a full $100 million less than what the studio projected it wold make prior to his melt down, and then his next film flopped. Those are the only 2 that have relevance at this point.

To ignore that obvious fact is either being purposefully bias or unrealistically optimistic.

Look, it’s still possible it could be great and be a huge hit. POSSIBLE. But I look at it, and the facts, and the circumstances and I predict it will flop. I could be 100% wrong… but considering the facts, it’s not an unreasonable prediction.

By: grendel25

grendel25 — Fri, 16 May 2008 10:28:58 +0000

How am I biased? I’m not making any predictions of a film simply based on a synopsis. The facts are, Cruise has had only one major flop in his last eight films, and that flop wasn’t even a starring vehicle for him.