<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Indiana Jones 4 Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/indiana-jones-4-review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/indiana-jones-4-review</link>
	<description>The Official Home of Correct Movie Opinions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:43:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/indiana-jones-4-review#comment-240731</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 01:40:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/indiana-jones-4-review#comment-240731</guid>
		<description>Yay, this one is my favorite!!! I love it! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay, this one is my favorite!!! I love it! :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Harriss</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/indiana-jones-4-review#comment-204972</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Harriss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 22:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/indiana-jones-4-review#comment-204972</guid>
		<description>you have to realize that its a indy film you can&#039;t expect it to be really haha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you have to realize that its a indy film you can&#8217;t expect it to be really haha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Harriss</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/indiana-jones-4-review#comment-204970</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Harriss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 22:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/indiana-jones-4-review#comment-204970</guid>
		<description>its almost like you have to be in on the joke</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its almost like you have to be in on the joke</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Harriss</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/indiana-jones-4-review#comment-204969</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Harriss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 22:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/indiana-jones-4-review#comment-204969</guid>
		<description>yeah but to me, it seemed like Steven and George where well awear they where being absurd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah but to me, it seemed like Steven and George where well awear they where being absurd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Harriss</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/indiana-jones-4-review#comment-204965</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Harriss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 22:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/indiana-jones-4-review#comment-204965</guid>
		<description>now your sounding like George Lucas
i think you need to watch the film again, yes they used CGI, but is that a sin, no, give the movie a FUCKING BREAK</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now your sounding like George Lucas<br />
i think you need to watch the film again, yes they used CGI, but is that a sin, no, give the movie a FUCKING BREAK</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Harriss</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/indiana-jones-4-review#comment-204963</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Harriss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 22:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/indiana-jones-4-review#comment-204963</guid>
		<description>ok this is soooooooooo annoying, for the people who hated it, actual watch the movie please don&#039;t think its going to be bad just watch it STOP letting your bias for the first 3 films cloud your jugment for this one this film was brilliant, it reminded us why we fell in love with indiana jones in the first place</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok this is soooooooooo annoying, for the people who hated it, actual watch the movie please don&#8217;t think its going to be bad just watch it STOP letting your bias for the first 3 films cloud your jugment for this one this film was brilliant, it reminded us why we fell in love with indiana jones in the first place</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Director</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/indiana-jones-4-review#comment-202985</link>
		<dc:creator>Director</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:56:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/indiana-jones-4-review#comment-202985</guid>
		<description>But this film reminded us why we fell in love with Indiana Jones in the first place, its Hollywood and being a Director you have to shut out all realism for a film as big as Indiana Jones</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But this film reminded us why we fell in love with Indiana Jones in the first place, its Hollywood and being a Director you have to shut out all realism for a film as big as Indiana Jones</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Director</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/indiana-jones-4-review#comment-202981</link>
		<dc:creator>Director</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/indiana-jones-4-review#comment-202981</guid>
		<description>People need to realize that they haven&#039;t done a indy film for a while its been 19 years (Spielberg and Lucas where off doing different kinds of films)
you can&#039;t expect them to come back into a Jones film know insistently what to do and how to make it perfect 
In my opinion i thought it was the BEST indy film out there and people complain about the use of CGI,
yes they used it, but is that a sin, no, its Spielberg&#039;s movie its Lucas&#039;s movie as the audience we really don&#039;t have the biggest say in what they do or don&#039;t do. Yes there where a lot of pulpy elements but to me that&#039;s what makes it a indiana jones film. and people thought it was to ridicules and over the top, but to me it seemed like they (Lucas, Spielberg)where well aware that they where being over the top so over all I welcome it to the series</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People need to realize that they haven&#8217;t done a indy film for a while its been 19 years (Spielberg and Lucas where off doing different kinds of films)<br />
you can&#8217;t expect them to come back into a Jones film know insistently what to do and how to make it perfect<br />
In my opinion i thought it was the BEST indy film out there and people complain about the use of CGI,<br />
yes they used it, but is that a sin, no, its Spielberg&#8217;s movie its Lucas&#8217;s movie as the audience we really don&#8217;t have the biggest say in what they do or don&#8217;t do. Yes there where a lot of pulpy elements but to me that&#8217;s what makes it a indiana jones film. and people thought it was to ridicules and over the top, but to me it seemed like they (Lucas, Spielberg)where well aware that they where being over the top so over all I welcome it to the series</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/indiana-jones-4-review#comment-176328</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 18:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/indiana-jones-4-review#comment-176328</guid>
		<description>Let me start by saying this is the first movie in years I was actually excited to watch a second time.

Come on folks, enough with the anal criticism that would suggest this film somehow doesn&#039;t live up to the Indiana Jones brand. The Indy wit, banter and cinematographical trademark are unforgetably present in this gem of a movie.

Harrison Ford is as ageless as Karen Allen is delightful and I can&#039;t wait for the next installment of this iconic film series that truly delivers the essence of what filmmaking is all about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me start by saying this is the first movie in years I was actually excited to watch a second time.</p>
<p>Come on folks, enough with the anal criticism that would suggest this film somehow doesn&#8217;t live up to the Indiana Jones brand. The Indy wit, banter and cinematographical trademark are unforgetably present in this gem of a movie.</p>
<p>Harrison Ford is as ageless as Karen Allen is delightful and I can&#8217;t wait for the next installment of this iconic film series that truly delivers the essence of what filmmaking is all about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hardcore Indianna Jones Fan from Vancouver</title>
		<link>http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/indiana-jones-4-review#comment-154804</link>
		<dc:creator>Hardcore Indianna Jones Fan from Vancouver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 06:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://themovieblog.com/2008/05/indiana-jones-4-review#comment-154804</guid>
		<description>I recently saw the latest installment of this epic series and all I have to say is that Cate Blanchett buthered an already murdered film. I could not tell if she was playing a Russian or English woman. Her accent was so bad, it served to diminish her pristine reputation. She has now become the modern equivalent of Jar Jar Binx from Star Wars. I honestly have no idea just how a team like George Lucas and Stephen Spielburg could have dropped the ball to this extent again. Hey guys...why don&#039;t you go and take another story telling class and learn what makes an interesting story.

This film had its good points, like the visual effects but the characters and storyline killed it and killed it bad. Like Mr. Lucas, if you insist that Cate be in this film, then get her playing an English MI6 double agent and make her use Indianna. I like the notion of dealing with the S.American Amazon myths but Crystal Aliens....wow....you really dropped the ball. The reason why Raiders and Last Crusade worked was because it was political, and quite frankly regurgitating the now really bad cliche of &quot;oh no, the Russians are coming&quot; is an old, tired and obscele way to tell a compelling story.

What were you guys thinking? Next time give Indianna a light saber, get him fighting some droid and while your on set, whip out the old Millenium Falcon for good measure.

I love ya buddy, but serious...if you can&#039;t take the heat of criticizm, don&#039;t produce something that can&#039;t hold a candle, or in this case a crystal alien skull to the strength of what the franchise used to be.

Harrison was of course timeless, the character of Marion at the end with the marriage scene was really spot on and it showed how much she loves him, but all in all...you really dropped the ball on this one sir. 20 years and the best you could come up with was an alien skull....here is a rule sir...don&#039;t violate the laws of physics if you want to have some degree of credibility, especially in the electro magnetic arena.
....omg...I could go on and on.

I am soooooo disapointed.
Well at least you made it....but....come on...20 years? Time is running out for you to redeem yourself Mr. Lucas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently saw the latest installment of this epic series and all I have to say is that Cate Blanchett buthered an already murdered film. I could not tell if she was playing a Russian or English woman. Her accent was so bad, it served to diminish her pristine reputation. She has now become the modern equivalent of Jar Jar Binx from Star Wars. I honestly have no idea just how a team like George Lucas and Stephen Spielburg could have dropped the ball to this extent again. Hey guys&#8230;why don&#8217;t you go and take another story telling class and learn what makes an interesting story.</p>
<p>This film had its good points, like the visual effects but the characters and storyline killed it and killed it bad. Like Mr. Lucas, if you insist that Cate be in this film, then get her playing an English MI6 double agent and make her use Indianna. I like the notion of dealing with the S.American Amazon myths but Crystal Aliens&#8230;.wow&#8230;.you really dropped the ball. The reason why Raiders and Last Crusade worked was because it was political, and quite frankly regurgitating the now really bad cliche of &#8220;oh no, the Russians are coming&#8221; is an old, tired and obscele way to tell a compelling story.</p>
<p>What were you guys thinking? Next time give Indianna a light saber, get him fighting some droid and while your on set, whip out the old Millenium Falcon for good measure.</p>
<p>I love ya buddy, but serious&#8230;if you can&#8217;t take the heat of criticizm, don&#8217;t produce something that can&#8217;t hold a candle, or in this case a crystal alien skull to the strength of what the franchise used to be.</p>
<p>Harrison was of course timeless, the character of Marion at the end with the marriage scene was really spot on and it showed how much she loves him, but all in all&#8230;you really dropped the ball on this one sir. 20 years and the best you could come up with was an alien skull&#8230;.here is a rule sir&#8230;don&#8217;t violate the laws of physics if you want to have some degree of credibility, especially in the electro magnetic arena.<br />
&#8230;.omg&#8230;I could go on and on.</p>
<p>I am soooooo disapointed.<br />
Well at least you made it&#8230;.but&#8230;.come on&#8230;20 years? Time is running out for you to redeem yourself Mr. Lucas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

